u/Useful-Inflation-972

A while back I posted about this exact issue, hoping they would finally crack down on people bypassing the generative AI rules.

Well, look at the Weekly Best Sellers right now nothing has changed at all. It's frustrating to watch unlabelled ai junk flood the top spots, completely burying real photographers and illustrators who spend hours on actual shoots, edits, and proper tagging.

https://stock.adobe.com/ca/contributor/212963129/Giulia

Adobe, your own terms require explicit ai tagging. Why are these portfolios not being filtered out or banned? if your current moderation team genuinely cannot spot these obvious ai images, i am dead serious just hire me. How does this keep slipping past you when it takes one second to spot visually?

Is anyone else noticing a massive surge of untagged ai in the top rankings again, or is it just me? Lets talk about how to get their attention on this, because right now the system just rewards dishonesty.

Honestly, we need to have a serious chat about what’s happening on our feeds and bestseller lists lately.

Have you noticed how some profiles are suddenly dominating the "weekly bestsellers" or top creator lists out of nowhere? If you dig a little deeper, it becomes pretty obvious: their content is almost entirely ai generated. Now, don't get me wrong using ai as a tool is totally fine. This creates a massive issue for a couple of reasons. First, it’s just not a fair game, a human creator spends weeks, sometimes months, researching, writing, and pouring their heart into a piece.

If you’re using ai to reach the top, at least have the decency to put an ai label on it, lets keep bestseller lists about real talent and human creativity not just about who can copy paste prompts the fastest. What do you think?

take a look at this profile as an example; you can literally find them among the top weekly bestsellers.
https://stock.adobe.com/ca/contributor/212036631/matej