
The Guardian’s lack of Pynchon
For those who are unaware, the Guardian released its list of top 100 novels of all time, as voted on by writers. I’m not really interested in litigating the list, though here is the link for reference.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/ng-interactive/2026/may/12/the-100-best-novels-of-all-time
The methodology of this list is that the guardian asked established writers to list their top 10 novels, and then they compiled all those lists and ranked them by how many people voted for them.
This means that, for whatever reason, modern writers are not citing Pynchon as a major influence. Now of course the Guardian has a British bias, but even considering many American novels made the cut, and many difficult novels, and many novels that push the bounds, and many modern or current novels (though less than classics).
So I guess I have two questions
why didn’t Pynchon make the list?
as a lover of Pynchon, is there something I can do to contribute to seeing his name on future lists of this sort, ways to promote the works and encourage others to engage seriously with this art?