Mr Earnshaw's visit to Liverpool
Sad to say, this has worrited me for decades. It doesn't make sense.
First off: why Liverpool? A West Riding farmer would sell his perishable produce - dairy, meat - in the local area, while wool would go to Halifax or Bradford, both about 10 miles away, or less than four hours walk. Yet he chooses to walk 60 miles to Liverpool, conduct his business, shop, and walk 60 miles back, in three days.
We are given exact details of his setting off as the family are at breakfast and returning at 11.00 at night on the third day. Not possible. The internet informs me that the maximum distance a person can walk in a day is 30 miles. Emily, who walked everywhere, would have had a verygood idea of times and distances.
So what's going on? Are we supposed to view this with suspicion? Some readers have concluded that the old man had a second family walking distance away, and that Heathcliff was his natural child. Two factors against that: Mr Earnshaw leaving WH is depicted as highly unusual, and the child he brings back speaks a foreign language. Also - he goes shopping! Everything points to Mr Earnshaw finding a lost child on a one-off visit to Liverpool. Except for the 120 miles in three days.
Any theories? I have one...