On the Theravada Tradition, Hillside Hermitage, and Ven. Nanavira
Hello.
Forgive me if this is a controversial topic. It seems Hillside Hermitage and Ven. Nanavira are controversial entities within the Theravada world.
I heard that their ideas are quite different from mainstream Theravada ideas. But may I ask how exactly they differ from the rest of the Theravada world? How do their views differ (views on Jhana, the attainments, Dependent Origination etc.)? It would be nice to have a comment objectively comparing particular Hillside Hermitage views with mainstream views.
I unfortunately don't know much about what is going on in the Theravada world. I am a busy person so though I know the basic concepts, I am also not that well-versed in the Dhamma's intricacies. I just try to keep the precepts and listen to Dhamma talks and suttas every now and then.
But after listening to some Hillside Hermitage videos and applying their ideas, I feel like my practice deepened and progressed. So when I hear that their ideas aren't widespread in the Theravada world, I become puzzled. How is it that they're really different from the rest of the Theravada world?
Don't worry. I am not some zealous follower of Hillside Hermitage. It seems some of their followers do seem to be on the crazy side, which is implied on past posts I've been reading.