u/Wooden_Affect_5455

Sappiamo che Anna non ha partecipato ai seminari di lettura alla Red Rose Mansion, però quando Lipsky narra questa fabia a lei, si ricorda improvvisamente il finale, e inoltre Johan puntandosi il dito alla testa come fa spesso, si sta "ispirando" proprio al gesto del Dio della pace. Quindi è possibile che al Tre Rane i gemelli possedessero non solo "the nameless monster" ma anche le altre due fiabe?

Non so se viene detto in Another Monster, ma nel manga/anime non viene specificato.

Ditemi cosa ne pensate, ma credo che Johan avesse già puntato Schuwald nel 1991, per poi decidere di creare la famosa banca clandestina, in modo da fare un test per vedere come portare al collasso l'intera economia mondiale. Questa teoria è rafforzata dal fatto che Johan si fece adottare dai secondi Liebert, per poi lasciarli in vita per 6 anni (dal '91 al '97) e usare il loro cognome per iscriversi all'università di Monaco. Inoltre nel 1992 conosce Margot Langer appositamente per ricavare informazioni sulla vita privata di Schuwald. Molti invece pensano che Johan abbia puntato Schuwald soltanto dopo aver conosciuto Margot Langer, ma appunto non si spiegherebbe l'adozione da parte dei Liebert. Perchè lasciarli in vita? Perchè usare la loro identità per iscriversi all'università 6 anni dopo? Inoltre non credo che Johan avesse prima fondato la banca clandestina per fare un test su un collasso dell'economia, senza prima sapere cosa fare dopo, cioè su chi e cosa applicare quanto aveva appreso da questa esperienza. Ditemi cosa ne pensate

Sappiamo che Martin Reest decide a un certo punto di pedinare Cristoph, per poi rivelare in quale hotel alloggiasse a Tenma. Successivamente Tenma si reca da Cristoph, per poi seguirlo. Ma Johan effettivamente sapeva che Martin avrebbe pedinato Cristoph per poi svelare la sua posizione a Tenma? Poichè è chiaro che, oltre a parlare con Capek, l'obiettivo di Johan a Francoforte fosse attirare Tenma in ogni suo passo, come faceva a sapere che Tenma avrebbe incontrato Cristoph?

If Johan erased the end of the tape, it means he was sure no one had listened to it. But a few episodes earlier, Grimmer and Suk had listened to the tape, stopping because Grimmer was feeling sick. How did Johan know Grimmer and Suk had stopped listening?

He did it in order to get to Fahren more infos on Schuwald?

Hi guys, I have a question about the nihilistic vision of Johan Liebert, the protagonist of Naoki Urasawa's anime Monster. If I understand correctly, until Johan recovers his memory by reading the fairy tale in the library, his goal is to be the last one alive at the end of the world. With this, I think he wants to demonstrate that life is completely pointless, meaningless, not because he feels like a victim, but rather to prove that life has no value. By having people kill each other (which is why he doesn't do it; he wouldn't prove it), he would demonstrate that morals, the values ​​we create for ourselves, such as affection, friendship, love, and general bonds, are merely illusions. In reality, when pushed to the limit, human beings will always look only to their own interests, killing others to save themselves. Therefore, the very concept of morality would be meaningless to him. If life had an intrinsic value, it could not be destroyed by an external force. If life decided who is poor and who is rich, who is beautiful and who is ugly, then it would have meaning, but we are always the ones who set these criteria, because life (for Johan) is meaningless in itself. And by causing everyone to destroy the values ​​they believed in, he demonstrates that those values ​​were created by man himself to have a reason to live, to get up in the morning. So not only does life have no meaning, but neither do the values ​​man attributes to it, because you can't give meaning to something that has none. And by causing men to kill each other in the final apocalypse, they are destroying the very values ​​they created, and thus Johan would demonstrate that they were living in an illusion. And by doing so, all men would be equal, that is, in death. I don't know if I explained myself well, probably not, I hope you can understand me and tell me if I was right or not. Thank you ❤

Hi guys, I have a question about the nihilistic vision of Johan Liebert, the protagonist of Naoki Urasawa's anime Monster. If I understand correctly, until Johan recovers his memory by reading the fairy tale in the library, his goal is to be the last one alive at the end of the world. With this, I think he wants to demonstrate that life is completely pointless, meaningless, not because he feels like a victim, but rather to prove that life has no value. By having people kill each other (which is why he doesn't do it; he wouldn't prove it), he would demonstrate that morals, the values ​​we create for ourselves, such as affection, friendship, love, and general bonds, are merely illusions. In reality, when pushed to the limit, human beings will always look only to their own interests, killing others to save themselves. Therefore, the very concept of morality would be meaningless to him. If life had an intrinsic value, it could not be destroyed by an external force. If life decided who is poor and who is rich, who is beautiful and who is ugly, then it would have meaning, but we are always the ones who set these criteria, because life (for Johan) is meaningless in itself. And by causing everyone to destroy the values ​​they believed in, he demonstrates that those values ​​were created by man himself to have a reason to live, to get up in the morning. So not only does life have no meaning, but neither do the values ​​man attributes to it, because you can't give meaning to something that has none. And by causing men to kill each other in the final apocalypse, they are destroying the very values ​​they created, and thus Johan would demonstrate that they were living in an illusion. And by doing so, all men would be equal, that is, in death. I don't know if I explained myself well, probably not, I hope you can understand me and tell me if I was right or not. Thank you ❤

If Vera told Tenma that she was forced to give up one of the twins, regardless of whether or not she was confused about who she let go, could Vera have told Tenma which of the two she wanted to send away at that moment?

Se Vera ha detto a Tenma che è stata costretta a cedere uno dei due gemelli, indipendentemente se si era confusa o no su chi avesse lasciato andare, Vera potrebbe aver detto a Tenma quale dei due in quel momento lei voleva mandare via?