u/YourLocalWatchdog

▲ 17 r/skagit

Community Member Raises Concerns About Mayor's Public Criticism of Councilmember

During the July 22 Sedro-Woolley City Council meeting, a member of the public raised concerns about appointed Mayor JoEllen Kesti's public criticism of Councilmember Paul Cocke. The criticism came after Cocke spoke during a Skagit County Commissioners meeting regarding the Northern State Recreation Area ballfields proposal.

The comments were made in response to Kesti’s July 8 remarks, in which she said it was "disappointing and inappropriate" for a councilmember to publicly work against the council's adopted position before another agency.

The community member referenced Washington law regarding the roles and authority of mayors and councilmembers, stating that councilmembers are independent elected officials who have the ability to express their own views, even when those views differ from the council majority.

City officials were encouraged to review applicable state laws and codes when carrying out their roles and responsibilities.

Community participation is an important part of a healthy local government. Residents who take the time to research, attend meetings, and share their concerns help keep public discussions open and transparent.

u/YourLocalWatchdog — 6 days ago
▲ 99 r/skagit

Two Salaries. One Person. Is That Fair to Skagit County?

Keith Wagoner is asking Skagit County voters to give him a second taxpayer-funded job while he keeps the one he already has. He currently serves as State Senator for the 39th Legislative District and as Senate Republican Whip. He is now running for Skagit County Commissioner, District 3, and has said that if elected, he intends to remain in the Senate as well.

This means one person is collecting two salaries from two levels of government at the same time. As state senator, Wagoner already earns a base salary of $72,494 a year, plus per diem ranging from $16,000 to $21,000 depending on session length, plus daily expense allowances, travel, and mileage reimbursement, according to the Washington Citizens' Commission on Salaries for Elected Officials. The Skagit County Commissioner District 3 position pays $154,349 annually, per the county's website.

The pay is only part of the problem. The bigger question is who gets his loyalty when the two roles pull in different directions. Say Skagit needs state funding for flood protection. As commissioner, Wagoner would be expected to fight for the county's full share. As senator, his job is to weigh Skagit's needs evenly against every other part of the 39th District, not advocate for the county alone. Push hard just for Skagit, and he steps outside his duty as senator. Stay neutral as senator, and Skagit doesn't get the full advocacy a commissioner is supposed to provide.

His voting record raises another concern. Wagoner wanted to keep a tax break for large data centers, voting against SB 6231; the bill passed and eliminated the tax break. He also opposed SB 5360, a bill that would have added new penalties for environmental violations and expanded oversight tools, and that bill failed. The way he votes makes it easier for large industrial projects to land in places like Skagit County. As commissioner, he would bring those same industry friendly instincts to decisions affecting Skagit directly.

Beyond loyalty and policy, there's also a problem with time. Wagoner already splits his time between Olympia and two counties, Skagit and Snohomish. Skagit County Commissioners serve as the county's primary governing authority, with ongoing responsibility for budgeting, policy, and oversight of county departments. This isn't a part time gig. Adding it on top of his Senate duties would mean covering a demanding county role and a state legislative role at once, while still representing constituents across two counties. That workload doesn't leave much room for either job to get done right.

Skagit County residents deserve a commissioner whose full attention belongs to them.

https://preview.redd.it/1545xwpla8dh1.png?width=852&format=png&auto=webp&s=625f9a6b11df2d355225dc65247adfcc64fe94c6

reddit.com
u/YourLocalWatchdog — 1 month ago
▲ 36 r/skagit

Can a Councilmember Disagree With the Mayor? Yes.

During the July 8 Sedro-Woolley City Council meeting, appointed Mayor JoEllen Kesti publicly criticized Councilmember Paul Cocke for speaking against the Northern State Recreation Area ballfields proposal at the July 7 Skagit County Commissioners meeting. Councilmember Cocke told the commissioners he opposed building ballfields at Northern State Recreation Area and preferred building new ballfields within the city.

Mayor Kesti stated that because the City Council voted 5-1 in favor of moving the proposal forward, it was "disappointing and inappropriate" for a councilmember to publicly work against the council's adopted position before another agency. In other words, once the majority votes, she expects silence from anyone who disagrees.

Councilmember Cocke responded that he was simply reaffirming the same position he had already taken during the council's public vote, and that he was exercising his First Amendment right to speak during a public comment period.

Washington law does not prohibit a councilmember from publicly disagreeing with the mayor or the council majority. Councilmembers have the right to explain their votes, advocate for different policies, and speak at public meetings as individuals, even when their views differ from the city's official position. Mayor Kesti's comments suggest otherwise, that dissent itself is the problem, not the substance of what is being said.

Punishing a councilmember for voicing a lawful, opposing opinion sends a clear message: fall in line or be called out. That is not how representative government is supposed to work. Councilmembers are elected and appointed to exercise independent judgment, not to rubber stamp the mayor's or the majority's position.

u/YourLocalWatchdog — 1 month ago
▲ 67 r/u_YourLocalWatchdog+1 crossposts

Skagit County Residents: Sedro-Woolley Wants To Destroy Your Wetlands For Ballfields The Public Won't Equally Share

Skagit County residents, your land is on the line. The City of Sedro-Woolley wants to destroy county owned wetland habitat to build at least four ballfields. They claim these ballfields will be open to the public, but they also say Sedro-Woolley will have priority use over every other town in Skagit County.

The Northern State Recreation Area, known as NSRA, is owned by Skagit County, not the City of Sedro-Woolley. For years this land has provided nesting habitat for the American Bittern, a species that depends on undisturbed wetland to survive. That habitat is now under direct threat. Appointed Mayor JoEllen Kesti, along with Councilmembers Nick Lavacca, Allan Henderson, Kevin Loy, James Cox, and Karl de Jong, are demanding that the county hand over this sensitive wetland for ballfield development, even though the city already owns land suitable for this exact purpose. There is no reason to destroy irreplaceable habitat the city doesn't even control when a reasonable alternative already exists.

Wetlands do not come back once they are disturbed. There is no mitigation plan, no restoration, and no do-over. If this marsh is destroyed, the bittern's nesting ground is gone for good, along with a piece of county land that belongs to every resident, not one city government.

The Sedro-Woolley community itself is not united behind this plan. This is not a done deal, and your voice matters right now.

You can submit public comments and letters directly to the Skagit County Commissioners at commissioners@co.skagit.wa.us

Skagit County land should serve all of Skagit County, not be handed over for one city's exclusive benefit.

reddit.com
u/YourLocalWatchdog — 2 months ago
▲ 26 r/u_YourLocalWatchdog+1 crossposts

Save the Wetlands for the Next Generation

https://preview.redd.it/z752dmedb2bh1.png?width=756&format=png&auto=webp&s=098f7755877fdc20e5c4f334639da62b91a029ec

On June 24th, the Sedro Woolley City Council voted to move forward on an interlocal agreement with Skagit County for new baseball fields at the Northern State Recreation Area (NSRA). They had a better option sitting in front of them. They chose not to take it.

The city already owns a workable site, presented at the meeting by Public Works Director Bill Bullock: the Winnie Houser and Riverfront swap. Parking and infrastructure are already there. It's centrally located, walkable for families, and requires no new construction in sensitive habitat. It's cheaper, faster, and already on the books. The council passed it over anyway, with no explanation on the record, for a slower, more expensive option in sensitive habitat the city doesn't even own.

Here is how that vote actually happened: It was not debated openly. It was buried as late material in the agenda packet. Councilmember Paul Cocke said it on the record: the public "had no way of knowing that we might be taking a vote." He asked the council to wait and properly advertise the item so people could show up and speak. They didn't wait. The vote passed 5 to 1.

This should bother you regardless of how you feel about baseball fields. The mayor and council hid this from the public. You don't hide a good decision. You hide a bad one.

Here's what they avoided debating in public: NSRA is not empty land waiting to be used. Skagit County's NSRA Master Plan defines it as wetlands, forest, meadow habitat, and Hansen Creek, a salmon bearing stream with protected buffers, sitting on a floodplain with high groundwater.

This land is also home to the American Bittern, a wetland dependent bird that cannot simply relocate. Noise, lighting, foot traffic, and altered water flow are enough to destroy its habitat without a single tree being cut. The council doesn't need to clear this land to ruin it. Just building near it is enough.

At the meeting, Councilmember James Cox responded to this with a guess. He said there is "an extra 500 acres for the birds to find a new nest when they're lightly nesting" and that "birds nest in man made objects, so I think they'll be resilient." That is not what the Cornell Lab of Ornithology says. The American Bittern depends on undisturbed freshwater wetlands with dense marsh vegetation and is rarely found in open areas. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lists it as a species of management concern for the exact reasons Cox dismissed: habitat loss and human disturbance. A sitting council member waved away a documented ecological risk with a sentence he made up on the spot, and the council used it to justify building on sensitive habitat anyway.

Some councilmembers also defended the decision by pointing to the NSRA master plan, which still lists athletic fields. This isn't 1994. The plan is over 30 years old, and its last update was in 2002, when the County itself found significantly less land was suitable for development than originally believed. We've lost even more wetland and forest habitat since. Using decades-old plans to justify destroying what's left is not planning, it's refusing to adapt.

The mayor and council call this an investment in children. A better site already exists and they chose habitat destruction anyway. You don't invest in kids by destroying the environment.

If this concerns you, email cityclerk@sedro-woolley.gov and ask that your message be forwarded to the mayor and city council. Ask them to rescind the vote, reconsider the Winnie Houser and Riverfront option, and bring this back as a properly noticed agenda item with time for public comment.

You can also submit public comments and letters on this topic to the Skagit County Commissioners at commissioners@co.skagit.wa.us.

reddit.com
u/YourLocalWatchdog — 2 months ago