u/Zealousideal-End7273

I think there should be a clearer distinction between different types of AI assistance. Using ChatGPT to brainstorm a few ideas, explain a difficult concept, or check grammar feels very different from having it generate an entire assignment.

If a student wrote the paper, developed the argument, chose the sources, and did the revisions themselves, should they really be treated the same as someone who submitted mostly AI-generated work?

Where should universities draw the line?

I’m trying to understand where the line is when using Grammarly on an assignment.

If I write the entire paper myself and only use Grammarly for basic proofreading, like correcting spelling, grammar, punctuation, and typos, I would consider that normal editing.

But Grammarly can also suggest different wording, rewrite sentences, adjust tone, and restructure parts of your writing. That feels like a different level of assistance.

So where does the line actually fall? If a student wrote the ideas, research, and argument themselves but accepted Grammarly’s suggestions to improve some sentences, should that be considered AI-assisted writing?

With professors increasingly paying attention to AI use, I’m wondering what students are actually expected to disclose.