u/_DESTRUCTION

Image 1 — Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.
Image 2 — Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.
Image 3 — Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.
Image 4 — Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.
Image 5 — Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.
Image 6 — Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.
Image 7 — Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.
Image 8 — Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.

Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.

Pioneer first image then Panasonic second image for each image pair.

Collected a free low hours Pioneer LX5090 as a backup TV.

Already own a Panasonic GT50 as my main TV, plus a G20, and previously had an FZ1000 OLED.

I decided to grab a backup plasma while they're still cheap/free. Found a very well cared-for Pioneer LX5090.

Before putting it into storage, I ran it back-to-back with the GT50. Well... Pioneer really were ahead of the game. The picture is insane, even against the four-years-newer GT50, which I love.

So plan changed: the G20 went into storage, the LX5090 became my main TV, and the GT50 got relegated to G20 duty.

The phone JPEG introduce a lot of jpeg noise and makes the Pioneer's blacks look crushed, but they aren't. All the shadow detail is there, the blacks just go that deep that the camera/compression struggles to show it.

I'm still gobsmacked how even in 4 years and within that time acquiring the Pioneer R&D Panasonic still struggled to bake it into their lineup until perhaps the last gen ZT65?

Room and Setup notes:

Same room, same light source, picture taken, I also swapped the positions of both TV's around, which meant both for a completely fair test so both got the same chance to show themselves in the exact same positions of each, running on both sources, both HDMI cables all swapped between both between images so each panel got the same run on both sets of equipment.

Both were adjusted in settings to get the images as near to each other as possible in terms of gamma, contrast and brightness, the only thing I didn't change were the colour management settings. Both presets were from default baseline ISF/User.

What do you think?

u/_DESTRUCTION — 2 days ago

My first Aquarium is a blackwater tank

As a nature lover I wanted to replicate something from the wild. For some reason I gravitated towards an Amazon style eco-system.

So the idea was born and after about 6 months of intermittent research on ecosystems from that area I finally formulated what I wanted in my head in terms of style, plants, stocking etc.

Blackwater amazon style biotope

All native planting

Surface:

  • Tropical Frogbit
  • Waterlettuce

Main:

  • Myriophyllum matogrossense - still coming up at the back
  • Hydrocotyle leucocephala - still growing from shoots, hard to see any in pic
  • Amazon swords

The plants are all placed specifically to provide a decent central mass focal point, coming up from under and around the main diftwood.

They will continue to grow and provide a much larger backdrop in time.

  • Tank is large cubed 155L - pic doesn't really convey how deep it is front to back
  • Walstad inspired but am over filtering too with OASE 350
  • Pond soil base, sand cap.
  • PH 6.5
  • Cycle time from zero - 5.5 weeks
    • parameters wise it was becoming ready at about 3.5 weeks but I didn't want to rush it.

School of 15 rosy tetra went in yesterday.

Rosy tetra were out and surveying within hours and setting up hierarchies and zones by day 2. They seem incredibly happy.

I'll probably keep the stocking as that now - adding more fish would, for me, affect the visual balance of the tank - and my goal is to replicate a slice of life in a South American tributary somewhere rather than stocking it with species after species.

My research often led me back to little bits of info gleaned from posts from this sub and others, such as r/plantedtanks - so thank you sub for being a valuable resource.

Whilst this is my first aquarium I learnt a lot along the journey - If you got any questions on something then I'm happy to share my experience with it.

Thanks for stopping by and checking this post out, the Rosy Tetra say hi.

u/_DESTRUCTION — 12 days ago

Why I ditched my main OLED for a 15 year old Plasma

I bought my Panasonic GT50 plasma new about 15 years ago, upgrading from a 42" Panasonic G20 plasma (also bought new).

Waited years for OLED tech to mature enough to finally replace the Plasma with a 55" Panasonic FZ950 around four years ago. The FZ950 went into the living room, the GT50 moved to the bedroom, and the old G20 ended up in my kid's room.

Despite spending probably a year researching OLEDs before buying one, I always felt a bit underwhelmed by the real-world improvement vs $$ spent.

I gaslit myself it was "better"... because the blacks were definitely more dark, it was more vibrant and the screen was bigger but I really noticed the stutter on pan shots (I watch a lot of nature documentary)

About two years ago the (now)bedroom GT50 died. I suspected the mainboard, but replacement parts had become so hard to find. Eventually I got one, although it then sat for another year before I got around to fitting it.

By then we'd renovated the bedroom, so there was no longer anywhere for the GT50. But I was getting constant hassle from the wife to get rid of it because it was just laid up against the spare rooms wall.

After fitting the new mainboard it sprang back to life, so I thought, "fuck it, lets do a back to back" I hauled it back into the living room and put it side-by-side with the FZ950 on the same source, spent hours on all types of media doing an A vs B.

To match the OLED's (left on on the untouched THX preset) colour saturation, I had to increase the plasma's color setting from factory 35, to 45.

With the GT50 in THX Bright Room and 45 on that color, it was remarkably close to the OLED for vibrancy and pop. Switching to Professional 1 with the color still at 45 gave an excellent match for dark-room viewing too.

Honestly, I had totally forgotten how good these fucking plasmas are.

Here's the rub. Last few years I've really condensed my pleasures in life down to what matters most to me. I no longer pay for 4k streaming, I game a lot with a RTX 5070, I enjoy movies.

Back to back I'd say my OLED had about an 8% to 10% better image in terms of 'pop', vibrancy and natural looking saturation.

But I actually preferred the image on the plasma back to back, there were some exceptions (dark neon scenes, OLED had that vibrant glow that just edged the plasma out, it was the HDR working its magic)

But c'mon, a 10% upgrade?? for well over $1000 (at the time)

So the OLED went... and honestly, despite a 15 year old tv and 5" smaller - it's the best tv decision I've made. I should never had talked myself into getting an OLED.

You know what's great? I can crank the settings on my 5070 to Ultra everything, and it hardly sweat at 1080p, and to me looks better than pushing its limits at 4k resolution through it on medium to high settings.

Loaded up Elden ring, max RT, almost wept on how good it looked on the Plasma. That moody atmospheric lighting and fluid, liquid like motion is right where the Plasma PQ sings.

reddit.com
u/_DESTRUCTION — 1 month ago