







Pioneer LX5090 vs 4 year newer Panasonic GT50 - Insane how far ahead Pioneer were.
Pioneer first image then Panasonic second image for each image pair.
Collected a free low hours Pioneer LX5090 as a backup TV.
Already own a Panasonic GT50 as my main TV, plus a G20, and previously had an FZ1000 OLED.
I decided to grab a backup plasma while they're still cheap/free. Found a very well cared-for Pioneer LX5090.
Before putting it into storage, I ran it back-to-back with the GT50. Well... Pioneer really were ahead of the game. The picture is insane, even against the four-years-newer GT50, which I love.
So plan changed: the G20 went into storage, the LX5090 became my main TV, and the GT50 got relegated to G20 duty.
The phone JPEG introduce a lot of jpeg noise and makes the Pioneer's blacks look crushed, but they aren't. All the shadow detail is there, the blacks just go that deep that the camera/compression struggles to show it.
I'm still gobsmacked how even in 4 years and within that time acquiring the Pioneer R&D Panasonic still struggled to bake it into their lineup until perhaps the last gen ZT65?
Room and Setup notes:
Same room, same light source, picture taken, I also swapped the positions of both TV's around, which meant both for a completely fair test so both got the same chance to show themselves in the exact same positions of each, running on both sources, both HDMI cables all swapped between both between images so each panel got the same run on both sets of equipment.
Both were adjusted in settings to get the images as near to each other as possible in terms of gamma, contrast and brightness, the only thing I didn't change were the colour management settings. Both presets were from default baseline ISF/User.
What do you think?