u/anubhav_1771

Hi Everyone!!

I was lurking in the community for some time and looking through many controllers. I am a bit confused, that's an understatement tbh, about which one will be best pick for me.

My budget is around 80 dollars and i really like xbox controller ergonomics so i specifically looked for controllers based on that. And I will play on PC, and via Moonlight streaming too, I have vibepollo-moonlight setup and love setting up games on tv even if host and client are on Wifi. On PC i would rather use MKB as really can't beat it's versatility. It can be fine to use controller for it sometimes but mainly i will use Controller for moonlight streaming only.

On basis of constraints and availability of the controllers in my country, India, these falls under my final shortlist:

1. Vader 5 Pro v2, confirmed v2 from where I can buy it
2. Gulikit TT Pro, max out of stock and i don't want it's extra features anyways
3. Gamesir g7 pro, maybe 8k version if difference is too much.

I was able to short list from many to these 3, added g7 pro even if I may not prefer it's design because it's solid reliable and I already stream via G8 Plus on phone and it's quite good so confidence in gamesir products is quite high. But I would have indeed liked it more if it was a bit wider angle for grips.

Cyclone 2 was first pick tbh but I would rather get cyclone 3 next year.

So among the three options, which one will be best for my use case especially when I would play mainly single player games on it with no FPS one as I hate to use controller for it, MKB feels better for them. So it would be for games like Spider-Man 2, Ninja Gaiden 4, Yakuza games, warhammer space marine 2, and so on.

I was actually quite interested in Gulikit TT Pro a lot because of hd rumble it promises. But it's stick has some issues even after firmware for some, or it may not matter for me? I don't know, I don't know if games I listed will need no deadzone mode which exposes its issues even more. If stick issue will not impact much i will get it tbh.

Vader 5 Pro has recorded a lot of QC issues as per this community, even v2 ones. I can get replacement of I failed QC lottery but it feels like every single one of them have issues in sticks or back paddle or what not in this community. Maybe only those which had issues in v2 version recently are more vocal about it's flaws?

G7 Pro would have been ideal pick for me if it had wider angle even if many here claimed its dpad is bad as I honestly use dpad for menu mainly or for Final Fantasy 7 like games so do not need fancy dpad.

Not a single controller i have shortlisted is perfect. That's why posting this, I would be really grateful if I can get help in this. I really need help from you guys who have first hand experience in such controllers as honestly I am quite new to them as I mainly played via MKB only till now.

My current controller has trash rumble and so so dpad that's why even looking into all this, I have increased my budget too to get one good dependable controller I can use for years considering it would not be used much tbh as I have MKB and gamesir g8 plus too.

Update: Had talks with seller of Gulikit TT PRO, it has no warranty, even if there is 7 days replacement, having no warranty is dangerous so will look into Vader 5 Pro after confirming it's warranty too. If that one is also not covered, fk it, will get cyclone 2 instead.

Hi everyone on this Community, new here so if I messed up some rules or so please do tell me asap, i will fix them.

I am in a 2 person team, I did a career change from Consultancy and Auditing to Data Science after my masters in DS. I am working as junior level data scientist for now, but issue is that senior AI engineer left the team asap after some conflict with PM and even told me to switch later after some experience lol. So a lot of senior level responsibilities related to AI system architectural designs are taken by me. Recently we had a project for Multi Tenant Agent as a Service focusing on open source techs mainly, I made an architecture and working on it but would love some feedback on it from people more experienced here, I have only 6 months or so experience in this field.

First layer of architecture is Data Layer comprising of Metrics.yaml, Business rules.yaml, and schema.yaml. Each tenants whill have different yamls for their use case. Metrics.yaml will be made after vetting from Client and PM, containing hard truths and metrics calculation pattern used in the organization. Business rules contain specific rules required for a specific tenant, suppose tenant A has logical key called Customer Code, and front end give that key too, our filtering will be done via too even if there is postgres based id.

For schema.yamls i have created an introspection script. Its made for one test client for now, it will take in database credentials and scrape all the tables, views, mat views and enrich it via information schema tables, pg catelog, pg stats and so on. Also would manually find core entities and do a BFS based clustering, tables/views reaching core tables with 1-2 hops as core tables. Other are other tables or so. For core tables adding query examples, full column info with examples, with llm based descrioptions for all.

Then there is a RAG layer which is qdrant based, self hosted version. Currently its using bge-m3 and bm25 based, tested sparse vectors from bge-m3 but they were not performing well in AB Tests.

For both layers till now there will be change management scripts too.

And finally we have Langgraph agent which is adopted mainly from Nvidia research agent and will use open source self hosted llms only. It takes in a query, do guardrail checks, do query rewrite and entities extraction before passing state till then to Orchestrator which will do first retrieval on basis of rewritten query and route the query. If more clarification is needed it will send back to User for more details. If some metrics are on top and they are marked as shallow, shallow research agent will take the query, or simply if on basis of first retrieval reranker score is high and query is not complex, shallow agent will take it in.

Shallow subagent will take query and use its tool like hybrid retrieval with query expansion, some analytics tool, sql execute tool, and so on to do work on ReAct basis, basically adding whole message data to a llm node and let it think and call tools. For now we are using Qwen3.5 9b Dflash at vllm docker but I will test some other models mainly gemma4 12b too. Anyways, shallow sub agent will give out the data.

On basis of that data there will be a Orchestrator Checkpoint which will consider if data is right for Synthesizer Subagent. If data confidence is low it will send it to Deep Research Agent to try once.

And in case a query is complex then Deep Research Agent will be used which will have a lot of analytics agent. Like a Text to SQL agent which will decompose queries and give out sql results. Recommendation Agent which will have specific tools for different tenant with different types of recommendation logic too, like co-occurrence recommendation for tenant a, recomendation embedding based for tenant a, and so on.

After data is collected and checkpoint is okay with it, pass it to the Synthesizer sub agent which has many report types as skills or tools for specific clients and return the output.

I will be really grateful if I can get some feedback on this, it is not complete architecture too and i will later make a full post as needed for this community. But i will be really glad to know that if at least direction is okay and industry grade or atleast trying to reach that standard. There is no senior to guide me in this and have seen many researches and reports and affirmations from llms, but they always feel lacking and soulless to be honest, looking forward to any feedback here.

And really thanks for reading till here.