u/baker19014

Image 1 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 2 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 3 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 4 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 5 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 6 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 7 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 8 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 9 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
Image 10 — [QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV

[QC] VSF Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV

  1. Dealer name: Steve
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): VSF Rolex Submariner (Starbucks) 126610LV
  4. Price paid: $501 USD.

Full Album Link: https://mega.nz/folder/GBhRTQoI#1I_wyGBGkKRVdx-W6VeX3A

  1. Index alignment:
    12, 3 and 9 all look nicely positioned, but the 6 looks tilted ccw just a bit.

  2. Dial printing:
    Looks largely clean to me, possibly a small dimple? Always hard to tell with the light they shoot with.

  3. Date wheel alignment / printing:
    Digits look good at a glance, but again, dimple?

  4. Hand alignment:
    Looks mostly good to me, though in a photo or two the Mercedes hour hand looks cut off, but may be a reflection?

  5. Bezel:
    Looks good overall. Digits seem to bee pretty centered and in alignment with only tick at the 55 marker being slightly tiled.

  6. Solid End Links (SELs):
    THIS IS MY BIGGEST CONCERN. They look good in most photos, but the photo with the serial number I can clearly see his glove behind on both sides. Could this just be the way he’s holding it in this particular photo? Is this salon enough for a RL?

  7. Timegrapher numbers:
    Rate: +3 s/day
    Amplitude: 270°
    Beat Error: 0.1 ms
    Lift Angle: 59°

These all look to be acceptable.

  1. Anything else you notice:
    The SELs are the biggest thing, interested in feedback from others.

Anything I’ve missed?

Thanks for your help!

u/baker19014 — 6 days ago