Login

u/balance006

r/coolgithubprojects r/toyotasequoia r/SideProject
Image 1 — Advise needed: Removing lower plastic front to do off road
Image 2 — Advise needed: Removing lower plastic front to do off road
Image 3 — Advise needed: Removing lower plastic front to do off road
Image 4 — Advise needed: Removing lower plastic front to do off road
Image 5 — Advise needed: Removing lower plastic front to do off road
Image 6 — Advise needed: Removing lower plastic front to do off road
▲ 14 r/toyotasequoia

Advise needed: Removing lower plastic front to do off road

Hello,

We got the 2026 Sequoia TRD and we cant do much offroad due to the lower front plastic. We have a ranch with wetland in FL. There are water streams that we would like to cross but entrance and exit are not even terrain and its kind of high terrain

The lower plastic is way to close to the ground, we need to have some space so we can climb the univen terrain.

Can it be removed? What people do? I dont get the TRD capability if I cant use it in univen terrain.

What people usally do?

u/balance006 — 1 day ago
▲ 124 r/toyotasequoia

New to the Family: 2026 Sequoia 1794 - TRD

Last week we updated our family car. From a 2022 Volvo XC-90 to the 2026 Sequoia 1794 -TRD.

We have a Ranch in FL and the Volvo was not up to the task. We got 3 flat tires in 2 months due to the messy terrain.

Above expectations to be honest. We love it. So powerfull and so elegant.

We had to wait 8 days to get the specific model 1794 Edition with TRD Package "Mud Bath" color.

Yesterday we tested it out in the Wetland and worked so well.

u/balance006 — 20 days ago
▲ 1 r/toyotasequoia

Any dealership selling the 2026 Sequoia 1794 - TRD Off-road Package (Mud Bath color)

I am looking for that specific model, I am in Miami FL but willing to bring it out of state. If its in transit and less than 60 days, interested.

reddit.com
u/balance006 — 1 month ago
▲ 1 r/coolgithubprojects

Free CLI scores your site for ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity visibility, finds the issues, gives the exact fixes (60 sec, 15 checks)

GitHub: https://github.com/WorkSmartAI-alt/citable

Free CLI that scores your site on 15 checks across AI search visibility (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI) and traditional SEO foundations.

Output is a 5-sheet xlsx including an Action Plan for non-technical readers and a Score Breakdown sheet showing the math behind every category. I am using it for a marketing agency.

Stack: Python 3.10+, httpx async, BeautifulSoup, openpyxl, typer, rich. MIT licensed.

What it checks: AI bot allowlist in robots.txt, FAQPage schema, Organization schema, canonical URLs, render time, broken internal links, anchor text quality, orphan pages, HSTS, more.

Honest about what it does NOT do: no JS rendering yet for SPAs without SSR, no authenticated pages. README documents 7 known limitations upfront.

Calibrated against work-smart.ai (mine, 100/A), stripe.com (74/B), example.com (18/F).

Companion tool: ai-visibility-monitor (AVM) tests how your brand shows up in AI engine responses. citable audits the site itself.

Happy to answer questions. feedback appreciated!

u/balance006 — 2 months ago
▲ 1 r/SideProject

so a couple weeks ago i shipped a new version of my consulting site. checked google search console two weeks later. brand search recovered fine, but i had no idea whether chatgpt or claude were actually citing me when prospects asked questions in my space.

couldn't find a free way to check. the SaaS tools (otterly, peec, profound) start at $300-500/month per site. doesn't make sense for a solo operator with a small portfolio of sites.

ended up writing 4 python scripts:

  1. citation_check.py: asks claude (with web_search enabled) "what are the best [your category] companies" style queries, records every URL claude cites, flags whether your domain shows up
  2. gsc_pull.py: google search console data. top queries, striking-distance keywords (positions 5-20 with real impressions)
  3. ga4_pull.py: GA4 data with a slice specifically for AI referrers (chatgpt.com, claude.ai, perplexity.ai, gemini.google.com)
  4. prereqs_sweep.py: checks robots.txt + llms.txt + sitemap so you know AI bots can actually crawl the site

ran it on my own site this weekend. 0 of 5 buyer queries cite my domain. the surprising part: every query had a fragmented competitor landscape with no incumbent. most-cited domain across all 5 queries combined had only 3 mentions. nobody is winning these. category is wide open.

stack is plain python + anthropic sdk + google api client. JSON output to /data/. didn't want to build a dashboard service since people would rather dump the json into whatever they already use. MIT license. runs locally on your own credentials. costs about $1-3/month in claude API for the citation check, everything else is free.

repo: https://github.com/WorkSmartAI-alt/ai-visibility-monitor

few things i'd love feedback on:

- bing webmaster tools pull. would anyone actually use this? haven't built it because i never look at bing

- citation check currently asks only claude. is adding chatgpt + perplexity worth the API cost, or is one model representative enough?

- prereqs sweep uses a generic user agent right now. probably should test per-bot UAs (gptbot vs claudebot vs perplexitybot) but haven't gotten there yet

got 7 stars in the first week. no forks yet. would appreciate issues/PRs if anyone runs it on their own domain. happy to answer questions in comments.

reddit.com
u/balance006 — 2 months ago