
So the cheaper plan is better?
Screenshot of the pricing page of paramount plus. Landing page, not logged in.
Decided to check paramount plus after news of the merger. Pricing seems a little sus.

Screenshot of the pricing page of paramount plus. Landing page, not logged in.
Decided to check paramount plus after news of the merger. Pricing seems a little sus.
I recently read this BBC article by Geeta Pandey (BBC Correspondent, Delhi) about the death of Ketan Agarwal and the arrests that followed. What follows is entirely my own impression as a reader. To be clear up front: the case is still under investigation, no one has been convicted, and everyone involved is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
With that said, the framing of the piece struck me as leaning in one direction, and I wanted to share why. First, It makes statements such as:
The BBC quotes Siya's mother saying whoever is found guilty should receive the strictest punishment — but that's the mildest version of what her parents reportedly said. According to ANI and other outlets, Siya's father publicly stated that if his daughter is found guilty she should face the same fate as Ketan, and her mother reportedly said that even if it is her own daughter, she should face the harshest punishment if proven guilty. None of these stronger, self-implicating statements appear in the BBC piece. The father's section there shows only his grief.
By contrast, Ketan's father's demand for the death penalty is given its own dedicated section, headed "Ketan's family seek death penalty," and stated plainly.
To my reading, that's an uneven distribution of emphasis: one family's call for justice is foregrounded, while the other family's equally forceful public statements are either softened or left out. That's my subjective impression of the framing, not a claim about anyone's intentions — I have no way of knowing why the piece was written the way it was.
It did leave me wondering whether a similar story with the genders reversed would have been framed the same way. That's a question I'm putting to readers, not an accusation.
I'd encourage anyone interested to read the BBC article alongside other coverage and judge the framing for themselves.