Kuku FM -- Read Audited Numbers Before DRHP Headline

Kuku Technologies (formerly Mebigo Labs, the company behind Kuku FM and Kuku TV) confidentially filed its DRHP with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in June, looking to raise Rs 2,500-3,000 crore at a valuation of up to Rs 15,000 crore. Media reports peg FY26 revenue at roughly Rs 1,400 crore, up sevenfold. Kotak Mahindra Bank - Corporate, Institutional & Investment Banking, Jefferies, JM Financial Ltd and Axis Bank are running the book.

Before you decide where to place your application, here is what the last audited filing -- FY25, under MCA -- actually shows.

  1. The growth is real, but the audited base is small

Revenue went from Rs 41.2 crore in FY23 to Rs 88.0 crore in FY24 to Rs 241.5 crore in FY25, a 5.9x jump in two years. The company carries zero borrowings through this entire period. This is the part of the story the Rs 1,400 crore FY26 headline is built on top of, and it has not yet been audited.

  1. Losses widened as revenue nearly tripled

EBITDA went from Rs -108.6 crore in FY24 to Rs -159.9 crore in FY25 even as revenue rose Rs 153.6 crore. Net loss deepened from Rs -95.7 crore to Rs -152.7 crore, a 59.5% deterioration. At the EBITDA line, the company is still losing 66.2% of what it earns in revenue.

  1. The improved cash burn came from working-capital not earnings

Free cash flow improved from Rs -112.6 crore to Rs -43.9 crore, a 61% reduction. But Rs 109.7 crore of that came from payables and other current liabilities rising -- Rs 59.3 crore from trade payables, Rs 79.6 crore from other current liabilities -- not from the business burning less. If these balances normalise, burn reverts toward FY24 levels.

  1. Net worth nearly halved in a single year.

Net worth fell from Rs 246.1 crore in FY24 to Rs 99.1 crore in FY25 as losses ate into capital. The offsetting positive: Rs 117.0 crore of cash and Rs 88.7 crore of current investments, still with zero debt. But the equity cushion going into an IPO is thin.

  1. There is a legal overhang sized against that thin net worth.

An income-tax demand of Rs 83.9 crore -- tied to Series B CCPS share premium -- equals 84.6% of FY25 net worth. Public reporting also references an IP suit from Pocket FM seeking Rs 85.7 crore with injunctive risk. Either one going the wrong way materially dents the equity base.

Verdict: the underlying business is debt-free, has prepaid cash collection, and a genuine regional-language content business share. But the FY26 revenue sits on top of an FY25 audited base that is smaller, more loss-making, and thinner on net worth than the valuation suggests. Read the DRHP for backing of FY26 provisional numbers and how the tax/IP litigation resolution.

reddit.com
u/bsnd123 — 3 days ago
▲ 2 r/marketsbyzerodha+1 crossposts

Delhivery - Ignore VC Selloff, Focus On Other Income

Delhivery (https://www.nseindia.com/get-quote/equity/DELHIVERY/Delhivery-Limited) stock fell over 3% this week on the back of growth-stage backers exiting. Alpha Wave Global exited its entire stake. Nexus Venture Partners sold a sizable chunk, and SoftBank Investment Advisers has been trimming since September 2024.

Given the markets are closed today, let us take a look into the MCA filings and find out what you should do on Monday.

1. The sell-off may be venture capital managing its fund cycle.

Alpha Wave invested pre-IPO in 2021. The IPO was in May 2022 at Rs 487. They sold four years later at Rs 460. Nexus has been selling since April. SoftBank led the 2019 round at a fraction of the current price. These look like normal exits from a VC standpoint and should not be taken as long-term investment signals.

2. Towards the right kind of financials.

EBITDA went from Rs 127 crore in FY24 to Rs 376 crore in FY25. Net Income turned positive at Rs 162 crore. FCF grew from Rs 385 crore to Rs 442 crore. Operating cash flow was 1.5x reported EBITDA. Trade receivables fell while revenue grew 9.7%. Earnings rising, receivables falling, cash conversion improving is the right pattern.

3. The balance sheet is clean.

Borrowings fell 68% to Rs 40 crore. When current investments are included alongside cash, the company carried net liquidity of approximately Rs 5,453 crore at March 2025 -- unusually strong for a logistics platform. Employee costs fell 4.2% while revenue grew. Depreciation fell 25.9%. Q4 FY26 operating revenue was up 30% YoY at Rs 2,850 crore with continued profitability.

4. Profit still depends on Other Income.

FY25 Other Income was Rs 440 crore against EBIT of negative Rs 159 crore. Treasury income on cash balances covered the gap between EBITDA and net profit instead of the core logistics business doing so. As that cash deploys into Ecom Express integration, the cushion will shrink.

5. Ecom Express may prove to be the key factor.

The Rs 1,369 crore acquisition closed in July 2025. Delhivery already carries Rs 1,308 crore of Spoton goodwill on the books. A second large acquisition immediately after proving first-time profitability is the same integration risk the Spoton deal created in 2021.

6. Customer concentration is not falling.

One customer contributed 16.51% of FY25 revenue. Top five contributed 39% -- up from 38.4% in FY24. A repricing or volume shift by one or two customers can reverse the margin recovery quickly.

Verdict: VC exit is not a definitive sell signal. But the next filing will have to answer questions about Ecom Express integration, fading Other Income, and customer concentration. The company has crossed the hurdle of converting network scale into cash. It is now a matter of keeping it up.

Read full report here: https://outputs.nullpointer.in/delhivery/preliminary_briefing_memo.pdf

u/bsnd123 — 10 days ago
▲ 3 r/marketsbyzerodha+1 crossposts

Ito Peers: Feedback For A Better Peer Set For Indian Listed Companies

We are a small startup and have built a peer discovery algorithm called Ito Peers (https://peers.nullpointer.in/) for the Indian stock markets. Posting here to get feedback and improve it. It is live and free. We plan to introduce a low-cost freemium model after Q2FY27.

The motivation was as follows:

  1. NSE classification: A flat list of everyone tagged with the same industry code. A ₹500 Cr niche firm and a ₹2,60,000 Cr giant appear side by side. No ranking, no confidence, no explanation. The tags are assigned at listing and rarely updated as businesses evolve.
  2. Manual judgement: You pick 5-10 companies based on experience. This process doesn't scale to 2,200 companies. And the output varies between experts, and you can't surface peers you haven't thought to look for.
  3. Ratio filtering: "Show me all pharma companies with OPM > 20% and Debt/Equity < 0.5." Gives you a pass/fail checklist -- everyone who passes is "equally a peer." This method cannot rank by the quality of peers. Filtering does not have any metric for confidence, and it treats every ratio independently when they may co-vary.

What Ito Peers gives you:

  1. Peers across segments: ITC's peer set spans not only Cigarettes & Tobacco Products, but also Hotels & Resorts, Packaged Foods, Packaging, Paper, and more.
  2. Ranked peers with confidence scores: HDFC Bank's peer set comes at 100% confidence. Ather's comes at 57%, an early signal that its financial profile has diverged from the rest of the 2W manufacturer cohort. Filters never tell you when they don't know.
  3. Quarterly peer groups across profitability, growth, and scale: so the right comparison depends on what question you're asking, not which filter you happened to run.
  4. Industry and geography filters to browse the full company universe. Search any NSE symbol and see the analysis.

Upcoming features:

  1. Segment and geography revenue mix for all companies with source citation: At present, there is no platform that does this accurately. There are complications when doing this from annual reports such as smaller single business entities not reporting their segments but rather just putting a declaration in place.
  2. Supply chain data for suppliers and clients: this is more complicated as there is not a single source of truth for this information so traingulation across multiple exchange filings is needed.

We are building Ito Peers to be the most data-rich knowledge graph of Indian listed entities and would love to hear how we can make Ito Peers work for you and where we are wrong.

u/bsnd123 — 14 days ago
▲ 5 r/marketsbyzerodha+1 crossposts

Turtlemint IPO - FY25 Revenue Jump Needs Explanation

Turtlemint IPO - FY25 Revenue jump needs explanation.

The Rs 882.67 crore IPO opens today. These are the salient points from the analysis of their MCA filings up to FY25.

Revenue jumped 742% in one year. No public explanation fits it cleanly.

Revenue was Rs 420 crore in FY23. Then Rs 79 crore in FY24. Then Rs 663 crore in FY25. That is not a growth story – it is a pattern that needs a clear accounting and business explanation before an investor prices it. The DRHP confirms these numbers. It does not explain the FY24 collapse or the FY25 rebound with sufficient granularity. Interestingly, Groww - Turtlemint IPO to Open on 19 June 2026: Check Latest GMP, Price Band, Timeline, & Key Issue Details - says FY24 revenues were at Rs 564.2 crore which is at odds with the DRHP and audited financials in the MCA filings.

The GST allegation hits directly at the revenue line.

The FY25 contingent liabilities include a Rs 51 crore GST dispute tied to an allegation that invoices were raised on insurance companies without actual supply of services. In the same year that revenue jumped 742%, that allegation cannot be treated as a footnote.

Scale did not move the loss number.

Net loss was Rs 193 crore in FY24. It was Rs 194 crore in FY25 after revenue jumped 742%. Other expenses alone rose from Rs 129 crore to Rs 628 crore – nearly matching the revenue increase. The business spent almost as much as it earned to generate the FY25 revenue figure.

Net Worth is declining every year.

Rs 744 crore in FY23. Rs 564 crore in FY24. Rs 411 crore in FY25. The DRHP confirms this trajectory. The Rs 661 crore fresh issue is partly a mechanism to rebuild that reserve before it runs out.

The receivables are growing faster than revenue.

Trade receivables rose 330% from Rs 37 crore to Rs 160 crore in FY25. Free cash flow was Rs -216 crore. Cash fell from Rs 268 crore to Rs 183 crore. In a commission-distribution business, cash should follow revenue quickly. It has not.

The audit trail was not fully enabled during FY25.

SAP B1 database-level audit trail was not enabled until September 2024 – five months into the financial year where revenue supposedly jumped 742%. The auditor noted this without qualifying the opinion. In a year with an unexplained revenue surge and a GST allegation on billing, systems controls matter more than usual.

Verdict: conditional go – but the conditions are demanding.

The platform is real. Turtlemint and Turtlefin together cover advisor-led and enterprise-embedded insurance distribution – a genuinely valuable architecture in an underpenetrated market. But FY25 has an unexplained revenue pattern, an active GST allegation on that revenue, and a controls gap during the year it all happened. That is too much unresolved for retail investors to absorb at IPO price without very clear answers from the DRHP.

Full report here - https://outputs.nullpointer.in/turtlemintfintechsolutions/preliminary_briefing_memo.pdf.

u/bsnd123 — 17 days ago
▲ 3 r/marketsbyzerodha+1 crossposts

Zepto is growing but with some red flags

Blinkit vs Zepto vs Swiggy Instamart vs Amazon Now

Quick commerce has strong local density economics, the player with the most dark stores in a neighbourhood wins on cost and speed. Blinkit holds 46% share. Zepto holds 29%. Swiggy Instamart and Amazon Now are on the tail as well. Zepto will have to spend heavily to stay at the top and retail investors are now being asked to provide the capital.

The DRHP has FY26 numbers but MCA filings are up to FY24

Revenue doubled from Rs 2,026 crore in FY23 to Rs 4,455 crore in FY24. Gross profit went from Rs 162 crore to Rs 974 crore. EBITDA loss narrowed despite revenue doubling. Post-FY24 disclosures from the DRHP show revenue of Rs 11,110 crore in FY25 and Rs 22,624 crore in FY26.

The company burned Rs 1,132 crore in FY24 alone

Free cash flow was Rs -1,132 crore. Net Income was Rs -1,249 crore. The burn is slowing relative to growth but it is entirely funded by external capital. The business has not yet proven it can self-fund.

The receivables number needs an explanation

Trade receivables jumped 357% to Rs 324 crore. Debtor days went from 12.8 to 26.5. In a business where consumers pay instantly, rising receivables imply a growing B2B or credit-based revenue component.

The auditor qualified the controls opinion

Unmodified opinion on the financials. Qualified opinion on internal financial controls, material IT weaknesses in access management, change management, and operations. Audit trail is not fully enabled and in a business processing millions of transactions across 1,000+ dark stores that is worth looking into.

ED summons arrived right before the prospectus filing

Founders were summoned by the Enforcement Directorate under FEMA in April 2026. The company also redomiciled from Singapore to India in 2025. This is not fatal but before an IPO governance issues do not look well.

Full report is here.

outputs.nullpointer.in
u/bsnd123 — 24 days ago
▲ 11 r/marketsbyzerodha+1 crossposts

Rajesh Exports was a red flag even before the Sebi investigation

1. A Singapore subsidiary reported Rs 226 lakh crore of turnover. And never filed a balance sheet. The annual report's subsidiary disclosure shows REL Singapore Pte Ltd reported turnover of 2,75,27,566 Lakhs of USD in FY24 -- approximately Rs 226 lakh crore at the stated exchange rate. The same filing also states the subsidiary had not filed a balance sheet. The auditor relied on management-certified financials, not an independent audit. SEBI is alleging Rs 15.15 lakh crore of misrepresented revenue.

Notes - Interest in Other Entities from FY24 AOC4 Filing

2. Rs 2.8 lakh crore of revenue. FY24 EBITDA margin was 0.12%. EBITDA fell 79.9% while revenue fell only 17.4%. A business of this reported scale producing this little earnings has no cushion -- one bad quarter eliminates the year.

3. Net income was really Other Income. Other Income jumped 899% from Rs 24 crore in FY23 to Rs 242 crore in FY24 and equaled 91.7% of EBIT. Reported Net Income of Rs 336 crore was not earned from operations.

4. A rating agency already called default in 2021. Brickwork downgraded Rs 1,100 crore of facilities to BWR D in May 2021 after citing information-risk failures. A company reporting Rs 2.8 lakh crore of revenue touching default grade on Rs 1,100 crore of facilities is a structural governance signal.

Full report here - https://outputs.nullpointer.in/rajeshexports/preliminary\_briefing\_memo.pdf.

reddit.com
u/bsnd123 — 1 month ago