u/c0mpu73rguy

AJA que légalement, Londres désigne une toute petite surface au centre de la ville, la city of London, et que tout le reste n'est que "le grand Londres", associé à mais ne faisant pas partie de la ville. La city en elle même compte très peu d'habitants, a une juridiction très particulière presque à part du reste de la ville et même de l'Angleterre (le monarque en place doit demander l'autorisation pour pénétrer dans la city par exemple).

Et du coup que ce qu'on associe habituellement à Londres, le pont, la tour de l'horloge, le London Eye n'est pas techniquement à Londres non plus.

Source: https://youtu.be/CPCgXbuWiR4?is=w91OsegyJH9T24QP

I was inspired by that topic: https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/s/L9oy5BEPtY

Which got me thinking, would a paper version of an llm work? Technically it could if we put the calculations in the user's hand and were a little lenient with the answers. It would basically be a form of bibliomancy but with thought out answers and a way to really find the best one.

I don't do that often but I asked Chat to generate what it could look like, the idea of separating the system in two books and how it works is from me, the text in this picture is entirely Chat's.

I imagine that sich a thing could not work for a whole conversation but it's fun to imagine. And also plausible, after all, the first computer programs were theorized before modern computers that could run them were invented.

EDIT: I don't really have a prompt for this picture, I just described Chat what I wanted to see. The prompt shared with the reddit bot is basically Chat summarizing what I said.