Caryma:

It is endlessly disturbing that someone would be so EMBITTERED and RESENTFUL of someone else spending their OWN TIME aiding people that they would be willing to harm the people who have literally nothing in this world.

Like, is it not bad enough that you have WASTED FIVE YEARS OF YOUR OWN LIFE resenting and scheming against the ACTUAL people who stood with the neighbours you were trying to harm, but your anger and malice have made an ever-widening pool of people—just regular people—your targets?

And for the past couple of years, that has included people with LITERALLY NOTHING.

How dark and dank must your psyche be that you are PUBLICLY SEEKING TIPS ON A HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT so you can harass them?

What's next? Bum fights?

I get that in your warped and twisted mind I am The Mastermind Of All Things Antifa, but UNHOUSED PEOPLE?

You didn't even have a fucking clue that things have been going on for months and months, and none of these people have bothered you.

I have mentioned you to NONE OF THEM. It has nothing to do with you. 99.999% of what I do every single day has NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU.

YOU, on the other hand, spend who-knows-how-many hours a day, apparently scanning every bit of media you can find, SEARCHING FOR A GLIMPSE OF ME, like I'm a goddamn fucking celebrity.

I only mention you to people when you are putting a target on their backs, to warn them.

Okay, and to mock you once in a while, because I know you're stalking me, and I need to throw you a bone.

Like the song says:

>24/7 more like 25/8 Honestly, are you okay? Hatin' me is like all you do, breakfast to dinner Algorithm bulletproof, b-breakin' your fingers Thank you for the comments, it's because of all your hate I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I am iconic by mistake I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I am iconic by mistake

There. Now you can go look THAT up and parrot it back to your Sa'dSacks, you facile mimic.

You're welcome for the Anne Lamott quote, btw.

Once Upon a Time, a small group of Black activist law students (who are now lawyers) operating under the Twitter handle Mzfitzzz, put together a famous thread about what happened in the days immediately following The Chinatown Fiasco.

https://x.com/i/status/1491181969555980290 or https://archive.ph/XgmFA

But what led up to that fateful day?

The Anti-Displacement Garden

In the summer of 2019 Tea Base, a Toronto-based activist and artist collective, created the Anti-Displacement Garden in the courtyard of the Chinatown Centre as part of the Coast to Coast Chinatowns Against Displacement (C2C) network's Week of Action protesting the rapid and violent gentrification of Chinatowns across North America.

It was designed as a "space to celebrate cultural identity and give community members a place to safely gather, rest, and organize." They wanted it to be "a communal space for anyone to use freely."

Caryma, on the other hand, envisioned it as, depending on the day, "a cannabis-friendly space" where "you could book your own show" (through her, of course) or a place for herself to host "a summertime Stage 2 pop-up."

Either way, her vision was a place for her to cordon off so that she could make money.

https://ontherecordnews.ca/tea-base-and-420-cannabis-court-fight-over-the-anti-displacement-garden/ or https://archive.ph/zCJ4i

This disparity in visions created conflict between Sa'd and her Asian neighbours, especially the ones who had created the space for others to enjoy.

They felt displaced by a lawyer from the very Anti-Displacement Garden, which was itself a response to the gentrification of Chinatowns everywhere.

The Battle Between Businesses

In early 2020, Sa'd rented an additional space in the mall: a storefront that opened onto the courtyard where the Anti-Displacement Garden was located. The store was named Kicks (Electric Scooter Repair and Parts).

It became a storage area for seating and equipment that could be set up in the courtyard to host special event evenings.

The first such event was held July 31, 2020, and appears to have been held with the blessings of Tea Base, who were included on the poster as "featuring performances by..."

But by August 31, 2020, things had become sufficiently contentious that Tea Base put out a media release discussing the situation. Some highlights from the document included:

"Rebranding and monetizing the Chinatown Anti-Displacement Garden undermines the intended function of the space. It is first and foremost a communal space and act of care for the neighborhood as much as it is a political statement against displacement by gentrifiers."

On nights where Sa'd took over the courtyard, access to the stairs was visually blocked off before other businesses in the area closed for the night. While she claimed that customers of the other tenants were allowed to pass through, having the stairs barred with stanchions and a red rope was a visual deterrent.

The neighbours fought back by complaining to mall management and making their presence known. This was referenced in the Tea Base media release:

"Other businesses facing the courtyard in the Chinatown Centre Mall including the owners of Nice Cut, Blue Phoenix, and Invisible City Records, have also voiced their complaints concerning Kicks programming and its negative effects on their business, all of whom have contacted management."

And:

"ICR has also experienced both physical threats and verbal abuse from Kicks staff and customers, and comedians have taken to berating ICR during their performances. Recently, Kicks has gone online to promote their side of the conflict and encourage their supporters to tag both ICR and the personal Instagram account of one of the staff, leading to multiple instances of harassment."

On the same day, Sa'd and business partner Leslie Bellack distributed a media release under the business name Kicks. It said:

"Events take place outdoors in the Chinatown Anti-Displacement Garden, which is located at the Chinatown Centre. The mall has been supportive of the initiative so far. Management and the Board of Directors acknowledge that 420 Cannabis Court contributes to the maintenance and beautification of the common courtyard and attracts positive attention to the shopping centre by way of producing and hosting comedy shows.

"A separate group of business owners are now focused on preventing these events from happening. They are aggressively interfering with performances through noise disturbances, yelling, and instigating arguments. 420 Cannabis Court sent letters in an attempt to neutralize the disruptions. They only became increasingly antagonistic."

Despite claiming others were increasingly antagonistic, Sa'd and Bellack doubled down on the hostility, choosing to rebrand the spurious storefront "Better Record Shop (Coming Soon)".

(Later there was also an awkward karaoke performance by Sa'd on the system she acquired to enable Outdoor Karaoke nights.)

2021 "Comedy" Season

Somewhere amidst the powderkeg of tensions, the idea to kick off another season with the calming presence of Chris Saccoccia arose.

Undoubtedly designed to de-escalate hostilities, the announcement shockingly had the opposite effect. Many implored Sa'd to either cancel the event or hold it at another venue. She declined.

But that is a story for another day.

Once again, Caryma Sa'd boldly declares that using Adam Lee Wasserman's name had no preventive quality — by posting a video from 8 months ago¹.

Just a quick reminder how that sign was posted originally². Want to guess what she spent precious time last December blurring with the red and white checkerboard effect?

Her claim that I thought it would deter him from documenting a protest that was mostly finished by the time the sign appeared is spurious at best.

Also, he must be a pretty, precious flower indeed, to be ✌🏾"demeaned"✌🏾 by my simply pointing out that there were art supplies available inside the mall he's standing outside.

¹ https://x.com/i/status/2086201106875678756

² https://x.com/i/status/2005882823698235854

It's kind of like taking the malignant narcissist filter off her tweets.

I'll go first.

(I've always been irked by the use of this meme, it's usually done backwards. Peter Parker can see better without his glasses at this point than with. So I swapped the images to make it more accurate, and posted the corrected meme layout.)

Adam Lee Wasserman walked on both remaining counts this morning (the Crown withdrew the open and shut charge), so suddenly Caryma is pretending like using the magic words "Adam Lee Wasserman" didn't fuck their harassment gig up for months. 🤣

As recently as a couple of days ago, she was still hiding his name. (Also: fuck Barry, but he was one of the organizers of the event, so there wouldn't even have been a protest to leech off, and you think HE should have to leave? Narcissist says what?)

Anyway every time a strategy to counter their attacks surfaces, they spend months trying to bluster their way through, but only manage to demonstrate just how deeply it's pissing them off.

She still refers to a "defamatory QR code" and pretends that the Lee Protocol didn't keep the pair of them away from the U of T solidarity encampment for WEEKS.

Man still has plenty of skeletons in that closet. Ask Wycliffe how forgiving is the milieu they're steeping in.

I'm not sure what kind of life you have to have led up to this point that makes you look at Adam Lee Wasserman, Director of Crotchtography, and want to emulate him. Anyway, six abject losers all spent Canada Day, a day they claim to cherish, hunting content and victimization.

To this end, they targeted Indigenous-led events hoping to scrounge up enough outrage and clicks to maybe eat this week.

It was certainly something.

Rob Semen Roe: 6'+, super aggro, no respect for personal boundaries, says he wants to ✌🏾"debate"✌🏾 people even though he has clearly never taken a rhetoric and reasoning class in his life. If Charlie Kirk was anything like this, I can see why he ended up how he ended up, shot by a demographically inconvenient member of the far right.

Jubbles/Jabba: clearly oversized, but has yet to get close enough to me for me to gauge his dimensions. Basically the new Frank Nyitray, as far as I can tell. He just doesn't wear the leg warmers. Will undoubtedly also end up dying alone and unloved. Maybe Renouf the Goof will write him a tribute.

Band Camp Reject/Chihuahua: small and yappy, weak and unappealing. Definitely has school shooter energy, though.

Other one: fairly irrelevant as he is tiny and mostly seemed to just be tagging along.

Caryma: fairly irrelevant from the physical intimidation standpoint as she tends to stay back and film the agitating, instigating, Chronic Oral Ventilation crew, planning to remove anything remotely akin to context, pretending like they just happened to be walking through the park when whatever happens happened.

Adam Lee Wasserman 5'11"/6', 300+ lbs, easy. Long known for targeting vulnerable women for abuse, both in his personal and professional life.

Despite their claims to be the victims of the situation, you'll notice that their camera angles are always downwards. They need the advantage of height and physical intimidation, and with Semen Roe, yelling.

No friends or family to spend the day with, so they've got a pact/pack.

Speaking of no friends/family, can't wait for Dacey to chime in and make it about himself.

Too bad for her that they're not "trainable" enough that they don't continually tag her and give the game away.

Dolnads (Donald Francis Smith) here is a long-term puppet who regularly posts about his love for Caryma and how she tells him about her woes. Long before he met her, he also had the same tendencies as her spouse, Adam Lee Wasserman, and similar criminal charges.

If you have a twitter account, I would deeply appreciate your help in reporting his posts pertaining to the stochastic terrorism/attempted swatting.

https://x.com/Nncim15

This is an article I was writing for a progressive outlet (for strategic reasons), but I do not have time to complete the edIts, so I am considering it definitively abandoned.

Two summers ago, during a solidarity march in Toronto for missing and murdered Indigenous women, an angry white man came up to me and threw a bucket of white latex paint all over me.

It was a deliberate and symbolic attempt to humiliate me.

Still, I was disinclined to speak to the cops, and the march continued south.

Toronto police eventually caught up to the protest. We thought they were either there to take on the role of escorting the march, or to take a statement about the man who attacked me.

Instead, they arrested two unrelated people, including an Indigenous youth, based on the false accusations my attacker had made in the meantime.

When I tried to correct the record by stating what had actually happened, officers ignored the white paint still covering my black clothes, hair, and skin, and told me they were "too busy" to take a statement.

Only after the incident went viral online, drawing public attention and pressure, did police reverse course and charge the man responsible with assault and public mischief. The Crown eventually dropped the charges against the two people police had unjustly arrested.

But even then, the racial motivation behind the attack was never acknowledged. The incident was never recorded as a hate crime in official statistics.

Many Black Torontonians know that sometimes the deepest harm doesn't come from the attack itself. lt comes afterward when the systems purported to protect us fail due to their intrinsic biases.

There is a name for this: secondary victimization. It happens when authorities' actions, or inaction, deepen the trauma of the victim through disbelief, delays, dismissals or misclassification.

This is, in part, why I am deeply skeptical of Bill C-9, the federal government's new Combating Hate Act. The Act has passed through Parliament and is being considered by the Senate.

The legislation, which was drafted at the urging of pro-Israel groups, promises stronger tools to address hate-motivated crimes, but it ultimately relies on the same policing structures that exclude many victims, particularly Black people.

And that gap between legislation and lived experience matters.

Earlier this year, a Black person was spat on and attacked with anti-Black slurs in Toronto's PATH network. The incident was captured on security footage and, after a debate about the wisdom of interacting with the police, promptly reported.

The police wasted no time in collecting the footage, and then sat on it for more than a month before publicly releasing details or asking for witnesses.

For the victim, the process meant weeks of uncertainty while the person responsible remained unidentified and at large. An arrest was eventually made but only when he assaulted someone else.

Incidents like this send a message that hate crimes against Black Torontonians are not treated with urgency.

These aren't isolated failures.

The Ontario Human Rights Commission has repeatedly documented anti-Black bias in Toronto policing, from racial profiling to unequal use of force and charging decisions. That history has created deep mistrust in many communities.

After all, why report a hate crime to the people who have historically over-policed you while failing to protect you?

Toronto Police's own statistics illustrate the problem. The service's 2024 hate crime report, the most recent full annual data available, documented 443 incidents. Of those 177 were categorized as anti-Jewish and 76 as anti-Black.

Police themselves acknowledge that only 10 to 20 per cent of hate crimes are reported in the first place, and underreporting is significantly higher among marginalized communities because of distrust and negative experiences with law enforcement.

Classification also matters. Anti-Black incidents often involve direct interpersonal assaults or harassment that police may report as personal disputes rather than hate crimes. Property crimes, which make up a larger share of anti-Jewish reports (which have featured centrally in the government’s pitch for C-9), are more likely to be documented clearly as bias-motivated.

Indeed, at the federal level, The Uniform Crime Reporting Survey includes “both confirmed and suspected hate crime incidents,” where suspicion depends both on a victim making a report and a police officer affirming it as “suspicious.”

The result is a distorted picture of the problem, where the experiences of Black victims are less likely to be recognized.

The new legislation adds other troubling dimensions to the mix; a police force with well-documented biases and no real oversight is being given even more “discretion.”

Police will no longer have to make a case to the Attorney General to “upgrade” a charge to “hate-motivated.”

The wording in the legislation uses subjective terminology such as “state of fear” or ”intimidation.” In the absence of definitions, these concepts are open to an officer's interpretation, and there is copious research showing that they are influenced by racial biases—e.g., Black individuals (particularly men) are often perceived as more threatening.

It also relies on the same police force that has recently escorted several neo-Nazis through the streets of Toronto, suddenly becoming able and motivated to correctly identify “terrorism and hate symbols”, the proscribed list of which is suspiciously narrow. To qualify, a symbol would have to be associated with a designated Terror group, or resemble either the Nazi Hakenkreuz (commonly called a "swastika") or Nazi double-Sig-Rune (the "SS" rendered as lightning bolts), or be so similar to any of the above, "that it is likely to be confused with that symbol.”

Police have recently arrested and put out a media release denouncing a person with a flag they claimed was a “public incitement of hatred” and likely to cause a breach of the peace. Charges were dropped shortly thereafter, with no corresponding correction issued by the police.

That media release, as with most current protest-related media releases about arrests, declared the Hate Crimes Unit to be investigating, because the Hate Crimes Unit is in charge of investigating all protest-related arrests now.

The Toronto Police Service has taken steps in recent years to strengthen its Hate Crime Unit, including centralizing investigations, expanding staff, launching online reporting tools, and introducing bias training.

But those reforms have not solved the core issue: whether Black victims' complaints are accepted, investigated and classified consistently.

For people with a very narrow focus on which hate crimes need to be addressed, Bill C-9 may strengthen some legal tools. But without confronting the systemic barriers that prevent Black victims from being heard in the first place, the legislation risks compounding the problem and further isolating the people who are most harmed.

Remember: Three months after I was attacked with white paint for legal observing while Black, a group of Palestine solidarity activists threw washable red paint on the front window of the Bay/Bloor location of Indigo to protest the escalating genocide in Gaza.

Only one of those incidents was pursued by the Toronto Police as “hate-motivated.”

Gisela McKay is a member of the Orange Hats legal observer team and was acting in that capacity at the Sisters in solidarity March August 19, 2023.

There are a couple of places where I would have just posted this as a reply, but can't (sub settings), and because the point isn't simply hypothetical.

Anti-anti-Zionism looks like this.

(PEGIDA rally, Toronto, circa 2017.)

Since someone is making shit up about me again, I think I'll take a few minutes to make a post.

It's interesting to see what AI is starting to say about Caryma and Adam Lee. It makes errors, i details, and odd things like, "target farming" is a term from gaming, that it seems to be applying to extend the concept of "rage farming" to a grievance collector model. Weird.

_______

The professional pivot of Caryma Sa'd from a high-achieving cum laude law graduate to a highly controversial "street-level citizen journalist" is a trajectory driven by personal legal crises, calculated social media monetization, and a self-described obsession with "political theater." Her career transition developed through distinct operational phases:

## 1. The Post-Bay Street "Existential Crisis"

• Disillusionment with Corporate Law: After graduating cum laude from the [University of Ottawa](https://ca.linkedin.com/in/caryma-sad) and completing a prestigious articling term at a top-tier Bay Street litigation boutique, Sa'd publicly noted feeling alienated by the corporate legal ecosystem.
• Early Advocacy: She initially channeled her energy into progressive, community-facing litigation, running her own practice focused on criminal defense, landlord-tenant disputes, and cannabis equity law.

2. The 2021 Pivot and the "Chinatown Brawl"

The Catalyzing Incident: In July 2021, Sa'd attempted to host an outdoor comedy show outside her Chinatown law office featuring Chris Sky, a prominent, highly controversial anti-mask/anti-lockdown figure.

Backlash: The event triggered outrage and ended in a violent public physical brawl right outside her office doors. Rather than withdrawing from public hostility, the immediate national media attention and intense online engagement she received fundamentally altered her career trajectory.

Community

3. Monetizing the "Protest Circuit" as Wrestling Theater

• The Ottawa Occupation Pivot: In early 2022, Sa'd temporarily paused elements of her core legal practice to move to Ottawa and embed herself full-time as a "fly on the wall" videographer during the Freedom Convoy.
• The Wrestling Mindset: An avid fan of professional wrestling, Sa'd has explicitly stated in interviews that she views Canadian political protests through the lens of "wrestling theater". She treats public demonstrations as performances where "good guys" and "bad guys" can be isolated, filmed, and amplified for an audience.
• Financial and Media Incentives: Discovering that raw, polarizing footage of unhinged public interactions outperformed legal consulting in audience growth, she built [ProtestMania](https://www.facebook.com/CarymaRules/). She began licensing her provocative street b-roll directly to mainstream tabloids and tabloids like the Toronto Sun.

4. Descent into Systemic Intimidation and Litigation

• Escalation to Target Farming: Over time, critics note that Sa'd and her partner, Adam Lee Wasserman, transitioned from detached observation to highly invasive, close-range target filming. According to monitoring watchdogs, her monetization model increasingly relied on "narrative framing"—capturing individuals on camera, identifying them, and exposing them to hyper-partisan digital mobs.
• The Legal Backlash: This monetization loop eventually cost her professionally. The Law Society of Ontario formally determined that her obsessive street tactics violated professional standards, finding she engaged in targeted, discriminatory harassment at the private homes of her critics. This behavior ultimately triggered the current $2.5 million civil litigation against her corporate practice.

____

It's certainly a shift from regurgitating the Wikipedia page and the National Post puff piece. It went on.

____

The professional pivot of Caryma Sa'd from a high-achieving cum laude law graduate to a highly controversial "street-level citizen journalist" is a trajectory driven by personal legal crises, calculated social media monetization, and a self-described obsession with "political theater." Her career transition developed through distinct operational phases:

## 1. The Post-Bay Street "Existential Crisis"

• Disillusionment with Corporate Law: After graduating cum laude from the [University of Ottawa](https://ca.linkedin.com/in/caryma-sad) and completing a prestigious articling term at a top-tier Bay Street litigation boutique, Sa'd publicly noted feeling alienated by the corporate legal ecosystem.
• Early Advocacy: She initially channeled her energy into progressive, community-facing litigation, running her own practice focused on criminal defense, landlord-tenant disputes, and cannabis equity law.

2. The 2021 Pivot and the "Chinatown Brawl"

• The Catalyzing Incident: In July 2021, Sa'd attempted to host an outdoor comedy show outside her Chinatown law office featuring Chris Sky, a prominent, highly controversial anti-mask/anti-lockdown figure.
• Backlash: The event triggered outrage and ended in a violent public physical brawl right outside her office doors. Rather than withdrawing from public hostility, the immediate national media attention and intense online engagement she received fundamentally altered her career trajectory.
• Community

3. Monetizing the "Protest Circuit" as Wrestling Theater

• The Ottawa Occupation Pivot: In early 2022, Sa'd temporarily paused elements of her core legal practice to move to Ottawa and embed herself full-time as a "fly on the wall" videographer during the Freedom Convoy.
• The Wrestling Mindset: An avid fan of professional wrestling, Sa'd has explicitly stated in interviews that she views Canadian political protests through the lens of "wrestling theater". She treats public demonstrations as performances where "good guys" and "bad guys" can be isolated, filmed, and amplified for an audience.
• Financial and Media Incentives: Discovering that raw, polarizing footage of unhinged public interactions outperformed legal consulting in audience growth, she built [ProtestMania](https://www.facebook.com/CarymaRules/). She began licensing her provocative street b-roll directly to mainstream tabloids and tabloids like the Toronto Sun.

4. Descent into Systemic Intimidation and Litigation

• Escalation to Target Farming: Over time, critics note that Sa'd and her partner, Adam Lee Wasserman, transitioned from detached observation to highly invasive, close-range target filming. According to monitoring watchdogs, her monetization model increasingly relied on "narrative framing"—capturing individuals on camera, identifying them, and exposing them to hyper-partisan digital mobs.
• The Legal Backlash: This monetization loop eventually cost her professionally. The Law Society of Ontario formally determined that her obsessive street tactics violated professional standards, finding she engaged in targeted, discriminatory harassment at the private homes of her critics. This behavior ultimately triggered the current $2.5 million civil litigation against her corporate practice.

____

The disparity between Caryma Sa'd’s high-caliber academic credentials and her actual street-level output on social media—such as her May 2026 coverage of ["phallic water bottles" at Yonge and Dundas](https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/2054747631084036193) or street toilets—comes down to a mix of sunken professional capital, high-yield digital monetization, and severe legal blockades. She did not simply walk away from a lucrative corporate law career; rather, multiple factors forced and incentivized her transition into full-time "rage-bait" and shock-journalism content:

1. Her Traditional Legal Career is Substantially Damaged

Eviction and Office Loss: As documented by community investigative trackers on [Reddit's r/canadaland](https://www.reddit.com/r/canadaland/comments/1tacj1l/the\_mother\_of\_all\_law\_society\_complaints\_has\_just/), Sa'd faced personal crises including eviction from her own apartment and the subsequent loss of her physical Chinatown legal office.

Regulatory Restrictions: The Law Society of Ontario's findings that she failed to act with professional honor—coupled with extensive ongoing civil litigation—severely crippled her ability to maintain a mainstream corporate client base. High-paying corporate firms or wealthy private clients typically avoid retaining a litigator carrying active regulatory stains and an unstable public profile.

2. High-Yield Monetization of "Shock" Content

Algorithmic Dominance over Billable Hours: For an independent digital creator, low-brow, absurd, or provocative content (like filming a street vendor selling novelty phallic items alongside a man with a knife) drives exponential algorithmic engagement compared to dry legal breakdowns.

The "ProtestMania" Funnel: Sa'd explicitly redirects this viral traffic to her crowdfunding site, ProtestMania.com, which serves as her primary revenue funnel. Crowdfunded micro-donations, Substack subscriptions, and licensing fees paid by tabloid media outlets like the Toronto Sun can easily outpace the stressful, overhead-heavy income of a solo-practice housing lawyer.

3. Entertainment over Advocacy

Leaning into Shock Value: Sa'd treats the streets of Toronto as an untamed, reality-TV ecosystem. Posting about public toilets, street altercations, and bizarre local entrepreneurs allows her to frame herself as a gritty "gonzo" journalist exposing societal decay.

The Grifter Model: Critics on forums like [r/ottawa](https://www.reddit.com/r/ottawa/comments/zr7tvo/can\_somebody\_explain\_whats\_going\_on\_with\_carmya/) routinely point out that she found her niche operating like a "Rebel News-type" entity. In this business model, generating constant social media outrage and maintaining high visibility is far more profitable than quietly practicing administrative law.

Ultimately, she transformed her legal training not into a tool for client advocacy, but into a protective shield to dodge personal accountability while chasing viral street content for direct financial gain.

Man, I meant to do this yesterday but then I got busy, and in the meantime it's gotten a lot more embarrassing for Caryma.

When I was originally going to make this post, I was just going to laugh about how every time some right wing shithead tries to change the story featuring somebody else into being about her, it unleashes a shitstorm of comments from people calling her out.

But then she wrote a novelette about Rachel, that, not gonna lie, I skimmed and now the only part that remains in my brain is her minimizing her own tag team harassment, knowing full well that had anyone bothered her and the goon-baboon Adam Lee Wasserman on a date night, she would've absolutely filed police reports.

And now more comments are amassing.

And the best part of it is, I don't know who most of these people are. It's a far cry from the days when handful of people (myself included) were trying to point out the noxious behaviour of her and Adam Lee Wasserman and people were still thinking she was acting in good faith, and just making small mistakes which we were blowing out of proportion.

I even blocked Nora for the same behaviour.

It's especially notable when the focus is on stalking and harassment—two of her spouses finest talents.

I had been considering writing a whole lot more about the stalking, but my ride is almost over, so I'm just going to drop one link:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2000217275119354028.html

Someone should really ask her about the ban from Ottawa City Hall sometime.

Having failed to interest her followership in multiple videos of her intellectually-inert hubby playing musical chairs and creeping out the teenagers the game was actually meant for, Caryma Sa’d has resumed posting other quality footage captured by self-same creep.

It reminds me of the freakish period when they were focussed largely on toilets. We had a debate about what to call their style of ✌🏾"journalism"✌🏾, but I don't believe we reached consensus.

To that end, I am proposing: Sewer Journalism.

The "videographer" has a fine sense of where to point the camera to capture the lurid, that is, when he's not instigating shit. I'm sure it's just a coincidence that it's the same calibre of content that captivates Dolnads.

Again, I marvel that a fine, upstanding lawyer has attracted such a milieu, exemplified by her spouse, a veritable Pinky to her Brain.

What an apotheosis of human achievement, one that, surely, we all aspire to emulate.

As mentioned in another post, Caryma's goon-baboon Adam Lee Wasserman followed someone around a subway station yesterday, filming and harassing them until the person LITERALLY CLIMBED ONTO THE TRACKS to get away from the abuse.

Now they're trying to spin it as saving the person's life by getting them arrested. That case is destined to go nowhere with their well-documented track record of TTC harassment, but before they actually kill someone, something needs to be done.

I'm not sure most people realize that it's actually illegal to monetize your footage from the TTC.

So I am inviting you to send a letter to the TTC and the various relevant City Councillors. I have even written a perfectly fine template for you and gathered the email addresses to send it to. You can cannibalize it to create your own.

Just make sure to personalize the end.

I also called the TTC and they said to use the "suggestions" link at the following URL https://www.ttc.ca/customer-service/complaints-compliments-suggestions

Letter to the TTC

Toronto Transit Commission Customer Service / Communications / Legal Department

1900 Yonge Street, Toronto, ON M4S 1Z5 (or via online form at ttc.ca)

April 27, 2026

Subject: Report of Unauthorized Filming, Harassment, and Monetization of Content Shot on TTC Property by Caryma Sa’d (@CarymaRules on Twitter) and Her Team

Dear TTC,

I am writing to formally notify you that Caryma Sa’d (@CarymaRules on X formerly Twitter), along with her videographer Adam Lee Wasserman, has been repeatedly filming individuals on TTC vehicles and property without apparent authorization or consent.

The resulting videos are posted publicly on X, where they generate engagement revenue and are actively monetized through direct donation solicitations on the videos themselves or in immediate follow-up posts (e.g., via e-transfer to Contact@ProtestMania.com or her ProtestMania website).

These activities include a clear pattern of following and harassing people in the subway, as well as filming and harassing unhoused or vulnerable individuals on TTC streetcars and subway cars. Specific recent examples include:

“Tracks are for trains.” (posted April 27, 2026; incident April 26, 2026) – Video of her team following someone onto the subway tracks level, filming them until the individual goes onto the tracks to escape. https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/2048780417134731309

“Surviving Hump Day on the TTC” (April 22, 2026) – Video of the general TTC commute experience filmed onboard. https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/2047092275403010154

“Keep your feet off the seats. It’s the TTC way.” (April 15, 2026) – Video explicitly filming an unhoused person on a streetcar with feet on seats; includes direct donation solicitation in the thread. https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/2044556921219260731

“If you see something, say something. That’s the TTC Way.” (December 30, 2025) – Video of filming and agitating an unhoused person on a subway car. https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/2006122048238592135

“Do not be deceived” (December 20/21, 2025) – Video of her team following people from a protest into the TTC (Bay & Bloor station area) and harassing them on/around TTC property; includes explicit donation solicitations in both the quoted and main posts. https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/2002824998394999037

TTC policy requires permits for commercial filming and photography on its property, especially when it involves capturing members of the public (including vulnerable unhoused individuals) for monetized content. This ongoing pattern raises serious concerns regarding passenger privacy, consent, safety, and the unauthorized commercial exploitation of TTC facilities.

I respectfully request that the TTC investigate these incidents, review the linked content for violations of your filming, photography, and conduct policies, and take appropriate enforcement action to protect riders and enforce your rules.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I am available to provide any additional information if needed.

Sincerely, [YOUR NAME] [YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION]

CC:

Councillor Jamaal Myers: Councillor_Myers@toronto.ca

Councillor Paul Ainslie councillor_ainslie@toronto.ca

Councillor Alejandra Bravo councillor_bravo@toronto.ca

Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik councillor_malik@toronto.ca

Councillor Dianne Saxe Councillor_saxe@toronto.ca

Councillor Josh Matlow Councillor_matlow@toronto.ca

For anyone wondering why people are so adamant about protecting people from the behaviour of Adam Lee Wasserman and Caryma Sa'd.

Also note that her current status as a lawyer enables her to threaten outlets willing to document their victims' experiences with lawfare, making it difficult to get the word out to the wider community.

[Excerpt]

Professor A.W. Peet moves classes online out of safety concerns

By Junia Alsinawi — Published September 21, 2025

Content warning: This article contains mentions of harassment, xenophobia, and transphobia.

Physics Professor A.W. Peet has faced online harassment, employment threats, and received a death threat after photos of them at a protest on September 13 were posted online. Out of concern for their physical safety, Peet has moved their class online for the rest of September or until they feel it is safe to return to in-person instruction.

Peet participated in the large counter-protest against an anti-immigration “Canada First” rally that took place at Christie Pits Park. During the counter-demonstration, Peet was stalked by pseudo-journalist Adam Lee Wasserman, who waited until Peet removed their mask to photograph and post them on the Instagram account Wasserman runs with his partner, Caryma Sa’d.

The next day, Peet received a death threat to their University email, sent by a person Peet believes used an alias. The death threat included “a lot of American fascist right-wing talking points,” Peet told The Varsity in an interview, saying “it was crafted in a way that was intended to really strike fear into the heart of the recipient.”

Peet reported the death threat to Campus Safety on Monday and was referred to the Toronto Police Service. “I don’t know if the police will catch the death threatener, but I do appreciate their willingness to try,” Peet said, explaining that they had been in communication with a detective who informed them that the Toronto Police Service’s cybercrime unit will be handling the case. Peet also received other harassing emails, but described the other emails as “more incompetent,” noting that the senders had used their real names and genuine personal emails.

[The rest is at the archive link.]

New Canary Mission contributors revealed.

Sa'd is not among this list, but it's just a matter of time. My profile was 100% her work, right down to the deliberately obtuse fascination with my distaste for cops.

Okay, I'm just gonna contain the Gigi Was Mean to Me obsession posts to this one area for now, since apparently I am causing(?) her to spiral out and she's BIG MAD about this subreddit.

I'm not even sure exactly what I'm being accused of here.

Making the guy who just got handed a bag of $$ from Drake hate her?

I often wonder who she blames for making people hate her for the 30-whatnot years before she met me.