Would you rather see a brand be funny or useful?
Funny posts can get attention fast, but useful content gives people a reason to follow the account.
If you were running a new brand, which direction would you focus on first?
Funny posts can get attention fast, but useful content gives people a reason to follow the account.
If you were running a new brand, which direction would you focus on first?
A good comment can sometimes get more attention than your own post. Do you use comments as part of your strategy?
After hundreds of conversations, an AI can learn a lot about how you think, work and communicate.
Would you be comfortable with a chatbot remembering everything you have ever told it?
Convenience or privacy where do you draw the line?
Imagine giving the exact same prompt to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and another AI. No edits. No hints. Just the same task. Which one would actually surprise you with the result?
Not their product or logo, just one thing they do really well. It could be how they use Instagram, how they talk to customers, their TikTok content, their email marketing, or even the way they handle negative comments.
Which brand would you borrow from, and what would you copy?
No obvious answers 👀
Drop a challenging prompt in the comments.
Pick something that requires reasoning, creativity, research, coding, etc.
Then people can test the same prompt with different AI models.
Same prompt. Different models.
Let's see what happens.
Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube get most of the attention when people talk about social media marketing, but Kick has a growing audience that spends a lot more time with individual creators. That kind of attention could be valuable for certain brands. Do you think marketers are missing an opportunity by not taking Kick more seriously?
Yes or absolutely not?
A page can have 200K followers and barely get any engagement, while a smaller page can have a really active audience. What numbers do you actually look at when judging a page?
Students can now get instant explanations for almost any topic AI can adjust the difficulty based on the learner The problem is that instant answers can remove the struggle that often leads to real understanding Some students may use AI as a tutor while others may use it as a shortcut Schools are already struggling to decide where AI fits into education Teachers could potentially focus more on discussion and problem solving instead of basic explanations But students still need to develop independent thinking skills If AI handles every difficult step, those skills may never develop Should schools actively teach students how to use AI or restrict it as much as possible
No ChatGPT.
No Claude.
No Gemini.
No AI search.
No AI writing tools.
Could you actually do it?
YES or NO and why?
A regular Twitch viewer might spend hours with the same creator every week. That's a very different relationship from someone watching a 15-second TikTok. Do you think brands are missing an opportunity by focusing so heavily on short-form platforms?