Number of microstate for an N-Particle system is not equal to Number of microstate for 1 Particle system to the power N. Here's why !!
▲ 6 r/quantum+2 crossposts

Number of microstate for an N-Particle system is not equal to Number of microstate for 1 Particle system to the power N. Here's why !!

A small misconception I had while studying Statistical Mechanics:

Can we always say:

Number of microstates of N particles = (Number of microstates of 1 particle)^N ?

At first it feels natural because if one particle has Ω₁ possible states, N independent particles should simply give (Ω₁)ᴺ.

But in the microcanonical ensemble, the system has a fixed total energy. The N particles are not represented by N separate momentum spheres. Instead, the entire system forms one hypersphere in the full phase space.

For one particle in D dimensions → momentum space is D-dimensional.

For N particles → momentum space becomes DN-dimensional.

Which is basically dof (degrees of freedom dimensional)

That changes the geometry. The Gamma function term changes from:

[ Γ(D/2 + 1) ]ᴺ

to:

Γ(DN/2 + 1)

and these two are not the same.

So the N-particle microstate is not obtained by blindly raising the one-particle answer to the power N. You have to count states in the complete phase space of the system.

For identical particles, we also divide by N! to remove the overcounting due to particle exchange (Gibbs correction).

A small detail mathematically, but a very important idea physically. Let me know if any error.

u/dwivedikaustuv — 13 days ago

Sooryavanshi is perhaps way bigger than what we think !!

Vaibhav Sooryavanshi is a monster ... I mean if He plays 18-24 balls in powerplay on an average in a T20 game.

He plays 18-24 balls in powerplay on an average.

Let probability of getting out on any ball is X

Then probability of survival is 1-X

Let say Vaibhav plays n balls.

P(survive) = (1-x)^n and P(out) = 1 - (1-x)^n Now I need to have a data set of survival rates ... for example percentage of risk.

Let's say 3 for high risk batters. Or 3% ...

X = 0.03 P(out) = 1 - (0.97)^n

If he plays 20 balls .. P(out) = 0.45

That's 45% Imagine if he plays 70 balls,

That's 88%

So ... it will be rarest sight to watch him play till end. But, boy if he does. In those 12% of time, we will see a double hundred in T20. We will see greatness.

u/dwivedikaustuv — 15 days ago

Rahul Gandhi's misinformed/wrong/brainless claim of Indian Govt. taking INR 3.5 Lakh Crore from families in the name of entrance exam fees.

I saw a claim that India collects around ₹3.5 lakh crore every year from students through exam fees. The number sounded extremely high, so I decided to check the scale myself.

​

I spent some time with ChatGPT collecting approximate data from India's biggest entrance and recruitment exams .. NEET, JEE, CUET, UPSC, SSC, Railways, Banking, UGC NET, CSIR NET, GATE, CAT, NEET PG, JEE Advanced, IIT JAM, CLAT, JEST, etc.

​

We calculated:

• Number of candidates appearing/applying

• Average exam application fees

• Approximate total money collected

​

Even after combining these major exams, the estimate comes around ₹1,900–2,000 crore in application fees, nowhere close to ₹3.5 lakh crore.

​

Of course, these are approximations and more exams can be added, but a gap of this size needs a proper breakdown. If ₹3.5 lakh crore is claimed, what exactly is being counted?

​

Sharing the calculation below.

Open to corrections with data. 👇

u/dwivedikaustuv — 15 days ago