▲ 0 r/China

An explanation to the extreme reaction going on in the PRC LADS playerbase

TL;DR: When PRC playerbases go scorched-earth, they aren't just acting like Karens wanting a refund. They are playing out a 60-year-old political playbook of mass denunciation, extreme group-think, and weaponizing the government to crush anyone who disagrees.

Have you guys ever noticed how absolutely nuclear PRC gaming backlashes are?

For example, in the West, if fans hate a game update, they leave a bad review on Steam or post some angry memes and trash talk. Take Concord: it got dunked on BAD but they were forced to shut down not because of the players, but because they were just doing really bad financially. But in China? The PRC playerbase sent literal cow poop and funeral flowers to Papergames’ office over Valko in Love and Deepspace. Not only that, but when Mihoyo released those exclusive global bunny girl skins for Honkai Impact 3rd, it didn't just cause a boycott. Someone literally tried to ASSASSINATE the company founders. And look at Snowbreak: Containment Zone, where a loud minority cried crocodile tears and mass-reported the game to the government until the devs had to panic-censor it to the point of near-EOS

From the surface, yeah, it looks like total, toxic fandom madness and people just being dumb. But there is a massive iceberg to this. If you dig into the history, this behavior isn't random. It is the direct psychological hangover of Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution.

Hear me out. Back in the 1960s, the early PRC government basically did a massive, violent reset on Chinese society. They locked up, exiled, or executed the educated intellectual class and teachers. It was so bad that it resulted into a massive intellectual flight (search up the Hong Kong Freedom Swimmers if you want to read more about this topic). Mao heavily empowered the massive, uneducated agrarian peasant class to become the country's ideological backbone (the "Red Guards").

To survive that era, people were aggressively conditioned into two habits:

  1. Total binary thinking: You were either 100% a loyal comrade, or a traitor who deserved to be destroyed. There was zero room for nuance.

  2. The "Struggle Session" culture: The way you got power (or just kept yourself from getting killed) was by forming a massive mob, publicly denouncing someone, and reporting them to state authorities for being "unpatriotic" or "immoral." Sounds like the Salem Witch Hunts, right? Except you had the government endorsing it.

What makes this even wilder is the massive dose of hypocrisy involved. Whenever these mobs want to bully a game developer into compliance, they conveniently pull out the state-sponsored "Century of Humiliation" narrative to play the ultimate victim card. They act like China is uniquely fragile because of its colonial history, using it to claim some kind of special moral high ground for their outrage. But honestly? Tons of countries were colonized or suffered just as bad, if not worse, and their gamers don't try to assassinate developers over anime bunny suits. The real irony is that these player bases scream about historical victimhood, yet they are actively using the exact same Red Guard tactics that tore their own country apart. The homegrown atrocities committed during the Cultural Revolution and early PRC, like the Campaign to Suppress Counter-Revolutionaries (which executed up to 2 million people), the Daoxian Massacre, the Daxing Massacre, the Inner Mongolia Incident, and the horrifying Guangxi Massacre, inflicted far more destruction on Chinese society than any modern video game update ever could. They've internalized the behavior of the oppressors while pretending to be the victims.

Fast forward to 2026. The physical Red Guards are gone, but that exact generational trauma and survival script got passed down to their grandkids, who are now the ones playing gacha games. The modern PRC internet mob operates exactly like a 1960s Red Guard unit, just with smartphones.

Take the Snowbreak situation. When a faction of radical internet users decided they hated the game's direction, they didn't just yap about it online. They used the ultimate weapon: mass-reporting the devs to government regulators for "indecency." They knew the government could delete the company overnight, forcing the devs to bend the knee instantly.

And the Honkai bunny girl incident? That triggers the historical trauma of the "Century of Humiliation." Because China was heavily exploited by foreign powers in the past, a lot of players are hyper-sensitive to the idea of a Chinese company "pandering" to Westerners while giving the domestic player base the short end of the stick. It gets treated as a literal betrayal of the country.

Same thing happened with Love and Deepspace and Valko. The mob decided his design was "too Western" and cooked up wild conspiracy theories connecting him to historical atrocities. If you were a regular fan who actually liked Valko? You got brutally bullied and harassed into silence by the dominant faction. It's that classic authoritarian mindset: agree with the mob, or you are the enemy.

What do you guys think? Does this historical context make the insane drama make a bit more sense, or is it still just mind-boggling to watch from afar?

reddit.com
u/eifenhower — 3 days ago

[LADS] An explanation to the extreme reaction going on in the PRC LADS playerbase

TL;DR: When PRC playerbases go scorched-earth, they aren't just acting like Karens wanting a refund. They are playing out a 60-year-old political playbook of mass denunciation, extreme group-think, and weaponizing the government to crush anyone who disagrees.

Have you guys ever noticed how absolutely nuclear PRC gaming backlashes are?

For example, in the West, if fans hate a game update, they leave a bad review on Steam or post some angry memes and trash talk. Take Concord: it got dunked on BAD but they were forced to shut down not because of the players, but because they were just doing really bad financially. But in China? The PRC playerbase sent literal cow poop and funeral flowers to Papergames’ office over Valko in Love and Deepspace. Not only that, but when Mihoyo released those exclusive global bunny girl skins for Honkai Impact 3rd, it didn't just cause a boycott. Someone literally tried to ASSASSINATE the company founders. And look at Snowbreak: Containment Zone, where a loud minority cried crocodile tears and mass-reported the game to the government until the devs had to panic-censor it to the point of near-EOS

From the surface, yeah, it looks like total, toxic fandom madness and people just being dumb. But there is a massive iceberg to this. If you dig into the history, this behavior isn't random. It is the direct psychological hangover of Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution.

Hear me out. Back in the 1960s, the early PRC government basically did a massive, violent reset on Chinese society. They locked up, exiled, or executed the educated intellectual class and teachers. It was so bad that it resulted into a massive intellectual flight (search up the Hong Kong Freedom Swimmers if you want to read more about this topic). Mao heavily empowered the massive, uneducated agrarian peasant class to become the country's ideological backbone (the "Red Guards").

To survive that era, people were aggressively conditioned into two habits:

  1. Total binary thinking: You were either 100% a loyal comrade, or a traitor who deserved to be destroyed. There was zero room for nuance.

  2. The "Struggle Session" culture: The way you got power (or just kept yourself from getting killed) was by forming a massive mob, publicly denouncing someone, and reporting them to state authorities for being "unpatriotic" or "immoral." Sounds like the Salem Witch Hunts, right? Except you had the government endorsing it.

What makes this even wilder is the massive dose of hypocrisy involved. Whenever these mobs want to bully a game developer into compliance, they conveniently pull out the state-sponsored "Century of Humiliation" narrative to play the ultimate victim card. They act like China is uniquely fragile because of its colonial history, using it to claim some kind of special moral high ground for their outrage. But honestly? Tons of countries were colonized or suffered just as bad, if not worse, and their gamers don't try to assassinate developers over anime bunny suits. The real irony is that these player bases scream about historical victimhood, yet they are actively using the exact same Red Guard tactics that tore their own country apart. The homegrown atrocities committed during the Cultural Revolution and early PRC, like the Campaign to Suppress Counter-Revolutionaries (which executed up to 2 million people), the Daoxian Massacre, the Daxing Massacre, the Inner Mongolia Incident, and the horrifying Guangxi Massacre, inflicted far more destruction on Chinese society than any modern video game update ever could. They've internalized the behavior of the oppressors while pretending to be the victims.

Fast forward to 2026. The physical Red Guards are gone, but that exact generational trauma and survival script got passed down to their grandkids, who are now the ones playing gacha games. The modern PRC internet mob operates exactly like a 1960s Red Guard unit, just with smartphones.

Take the Snowbreak situation. When a faction of radical internet users decided they hated the game's direction, they didn't just yap about it online. They used the ultimate weapon: mass-reporting the devs to government regulators for "indecency." They knew the government could delete the company overnight, forcing the devs to bend the knee instantly.

And the Honkai bunny girl incident? That triggers the historical trauma of the "Century of Humiliation." Because China was heavily exploited by foreign powers in the past, a lot of players are hyper-sensitive to the idea of a Chinese company "pandering" to Westerners while giving the domestic player base the short end of the stick. It gets treated as a literal betrayal of the country.

Same thing happened with Love and Deepspace and Valko. The mob decided his design was "too Western" and cooked up wild conspiracy theories connecting him to historical atrocities. If you were a regular fan who actually liked Valko? You got brutally bullied and harassed into silence by the dominant faction. It's that classic authoritarian mindset: agree with the mob, or you are the enemy.

What do you guys think? Does this historical context make the insane drama make a bit more sense, or is it still just mind-boggling to watch from afar?

reddit.com
u/eifenhower — 3 days ago

Question about MEPS concerning non-self-harm scars

Hello! So I'm currently trying to enlist for the Marines. My documents are all good to go and my recruiter scheduled my MEPS next Monday. I took the PICAT (actually speedran it, I'm assuming I'm taking the ASVAB so I don't get complacent) and got a 90 AFQT along with pretty high line scores with mostly 60s, only one 40 something. I'm not really concerned about that, though.

The situation is that I've got healed superficial scars from a month ago on my thigh from some kinky sex with my wife. She wanted to mark me and I agreed to it as long as it was in a small area on my thigh, and that it was shallow. However, it left a bunch of horizontal linear scarring. At first, I didn't really think about it, since I heal pretty good and scars usually disappear in around 3-6 months. However, I found out about MEPS DQ'ing people for scars, and I realized, "oh fuck."

I already told my recruiter ahead of time, and they said to just go ahead and be honest since I "should be fine as long as I have no diagnoses." Which is true. I don't have any diagnoses, no maintenance medications for anything at all, I don't have any hospitalizations, and I never had any mental health related consults with any healthcare provider. I'm not suicidal and I'm living life (maybe a little too well).

I'm planning to disclose this on the 40-1-18 with my explanation, but considering I heard some stories of people getting DQ'd for being questioned about scars, them saying "I don't know," and then the MEPS doctors going "okay then that's self harm." I also answered "no" for LITERALLY everything on the 2807-02 (which is true) and for "103. Self-inflicted injury such as cutting or burning" (which is also true, my wife gave me these, not me).

If the doctor DOES ask, I will be honest, don't worry, even if my reason sounds wild as hell. However, I don't know if they're going to A. accept it, B. temporary hold for a psych eval, or C. PDQ/waiver. I'm not planning on hiding this, but I'm worried the doctor might throw a curveball and go for C. I'm hoping on getting into an MOS with TS/SCI, so if the doctor goes for option C, I'm worried this might fuck with my SF-86.

In short. Am I fucked? Or am I just overthinking the hell out of this?

reddit.com
u/eifenhower — 2 months ago