Grusch and other whistleblowers credibility test
Im kind of shocked people still has high regards for whistleblowers that end up having a place in public discussion, by logic if they were legit and a threat to the system, military complex and govt, they would already being take care of, besides that the times elizondo has being caught lying make me have serious doubts about the ufo community ctritical thinking skills
But theres a few things i like to discuss about grusch and that can be applied to others.
- Has grusch ever rejected an stablished ufo theory? Because i saw he talks about lizards inside tic tacs, uderwater bases, plasma beings, war between alien races, everything seems to be true, if the guy cant say what isnt true about ufos, that by simple logic, AND by the fact that dissinformation campaings have been a crticial part of the phenomena (that is one fact no one can dismiss), then hes no stating any truth, hes just confirming tales of others, without evidence btw.
- On the other side, does he bring any new info about them, in terms of explanation of what they are, or just variations of old/present theories
- Whats the level of economic benefit hes getting from all this?, elizondo releases books of just bs and use his fame to seel them to people
- Does he provides dates for event that never came true and then comes up with new ones?, i mean come on, thats when i lost all respect for bledsoe
All this confirms to me that ufo are most likely a physical event for which we have no psychological, scientific framework and even language to adress, identify or process, is an ever morphing presence that takes the shape of the witness and we may need an evolutionary brink to understand, all else are scammers trying to profit and govt trying to control the narrative of something truly unknown