Could Kierkegaard's philosophy regarding faith be used for any other religion?
I've been reading Kierkegaard and have had a question about whether or not his arguments are pro-religion as opposed to pro-Christianity
Kierkegaard's arguments about the limits of reason, the necessity of faith, the leap of faith, and existential commitment are persuasive, but however they don't seem to privilege Christianity over other religions.
A Muslim, Jew, or another theist could probably adopt Kierkegaard's framework when talking about how reason has limits, faith not being reduced to objective proof, and how a relationship with God involves risk rather than certainty.
If that's true, then Kierkegaard appears to defend the structure of religious faith, not necessarily Christianity in particular.
Here's my question:
Does Kierkegarrd's philosophy justify faith in any religion, and not just Christianity? If so, what would stop someone from saying "if this applies to all religions then how does that prove that Christianity is the religion to follow" or some variation of that
Might be parts i'm missing or have oversimplified/misunderstood, if so I'm happy to learn more from your comments
Cheers