Real question for the people who actually know grades: could an AI ever earn your trust over a human grader — or is that a fantasy?
I've been collecting 33 years and I run a small software shop, so I'm building the tool I always wished existed instead of waiting for someone outside the hobby to get it wrong. It's an AI that reads a raw book and estimates the grade — before you ever pay CGC and wait months to find out you overpaid on a book that came back two points light.
But I'm not here to pitch it. I'm here because this sub actually knows grades cold, and I'd rather get torched by you now than ship something that insults your eye. So, straight up:
What would an AI have to nail before you'd trust its read over your own — or over a human grader's?
What's the deal-breaker flaw? The thing that, if the tool misses it, you write the whole thing off? Spine roll, resto, color touch, page quality, ripples, a subtle bindery defect — where does software fall on its face?
Would a pre-submission grade read even be worth paying for? Or is the value only ever in the slab itself?
And anything I didn't ask — if you've ever thought "I wish something could just tell me X before I submit," that's exactly what I want to hear.
Roast it. Poke holes. Tell me it can't be done and why. That's the whole reason I'm posting.