u/greenachors

Read Broken Plea

One thing that I'm still wrestling with on this book. Yes, it brings up a lot of inconsistencies and overlooks in the investigation. I've yet to hear anything truly definitive that leads me to believe that BK didn't commit these crimes though. The autopsy and lack of consistency with the K-bar is what gives me most pause, but why didn't his legal team latch on to these things? I'm just confused. Why did he just lay down and take this if he didn't do it? Why not attempt a defense?

The first chapter talks about looking at the evidence against BK, but it never really got deep into the evidence against BK. It just highlighted the inconsistencies in the friends stories. Dont take this as me challenging what seems to be the popular narrative on this sub, I'm just confused as to what you're hearing that I'm not.

What have you all heard that I didn't hear in the book/other material? I could obviously be missing something.

I just find it strange that BK would take a plea on this due to a death penalty possibility and be so passive in the fact that people are convinced he committed these crimes, when he actually didn't. Like where is the fight in him on this? I'm just having a hard time with this one. I do want to understand where people are coming from though.

reddit.com
u/greenachors — 5 days ago