Anarchy has a branding issue
I identify with some tenants of anarchism and really appreciate the emphasis on doing away with hierarchies. If you look at tribes, even in the present day, hunter gatherers who don't store food or rely on territory (ie salmon runs) are very often egalitarian. I am genuinely wondering on what makes people drawn to anarchism over egalitarianism?
Even if someone were to agree with the ideology of anarchism, the conversation is immediately made more difficult because the term is so loaded with pre-disposition that I think often, people will just shut down and think you're a maniac. The thing anarchy relies on, mass participation in it, is driven away by the label itself due to both propaganda and many people believing that the 'state of nature' is chaos without law, religion, etc.
It would be pretty difficult for someone to successfully scare people about egalitarian politics lol. The main argument would be what it basically always is - what happens when the egalitarian society is invaded or pressed by a hierchichal state, with all of its machinery, funding and nationalism? And of course in this scenario it's likely the same answer -- you don't have it without mass participation in the first place, and there would (and is as we see with basically every tribe subscribing to it) be mutual defense.
So what is it about anarchism specifically that draws you over egalitarianism? What would you say to people whose concern is lawlessness or eventually being bordered by a menacing nation-state?
Here to learn.