Login

u/k34-yoop

Starlink & STMicro modem chip demand for comparison
▲ 7 r/GCTS

Starlink & STMicro modem chip demand for comparison

If GCT is working with Amazon LEO & Globalstar on the Platform Reference agreement than what will be the future demand?

One proxy is by looking at Starlink & STMicro.

Over 10+ years STMicro has provided billions of chips to Starlink. Each terminal requires hundreds of chips. This may be a different architecture from Amazon LEO, but the "Low millions of chips annually" the company stated in Q4 call may be just the tip of the iceberg.

Here's a Gemini thread for reference.

https://g.co/gemini/share/aee01c4c8133

u/k34-yoop — 4 days ago
▲ 19 r/GCTS

GCTS So what happens next?

GCT is getting noticed and the story of their involvement with "one of the largest satellite communications companies" with "low millions" in chip volume can't be ignored by Wall Street.

It's worth noting that any use case that requires "low millions" of chip orders per year is undoubtedly a consumer facing application. So, think Amazon LEO or Starlink as examples.

So what's going to happen as we move forward? Where will GCTS be in over the next 6 months to a year?

Here's my thoughts. As always, this is not investment advice and I recommend everyone do your own research:

  1. Short sellers will try to attack the company and characterize it as a fraud or fake. Shorts love to demonize companies with operations outside USA as a scam. However, this will be a great opportunity in my opinion, because their characterization will be completely misplaced. GCT has orders with Alphachips that coordinates and readies demand with Samsung Foundry. Additionally, reputable analyst firms ( B. Riley and HCW ) have come out with $3-4 targets even with known potential dilution. Lastly the company is listed on the NYSE, notoriously one of the hardest exchanges, most stringent, in terms of listing requirements.

  2. GCT will almost certainly get additional orders beyond what the analysts know today. This is why I'm on record as saying $10-12 is possible by EOY.

  3. The company needs capital to fund initial order placements with the Foundaries and for R&D expenses ( i.e. working with OEMs to integrate the chip orders for the reference platform agreement ). So dilution might occur. Another possibility is that a prepayment option occurs. If the latter than dilution is off the table and the shàre price targets by analysts could be adjusted upwards.

  4. At some point the satcom company will become known or announced. I'm on record as saying I believe it is Amazon + Globalstar. But there has also been collaboration with Iridium. I think it is probably not Iridium, simply because the order volumes are too large.

  5. If I'm right that it's Amazon, then this chip company and it's tech is likely an integral part of a consumer facing use case. This strategic position means Amazon needs to ensure GCT doesn't fall into a competitor's hands. This sets up the potential for an acquisition.

Much of my anslysis is based logical dedication and reasoning through facts that are publicly available. Could I be wrong? Yes. I could.

Additionally, there always risks. Noting is 100%. A Korean war on the peninsula would , could impact the bull case. A sudden tech innovation rendering modem chips obsolete would devastating consequences. There are many others.

But the platform reference agreement with the satcom provider was a definitive point. It shifted GCT from being a struggling chip company to being a core part of large use case and ecosystem of OEMs. Now...we just wait to see what that use case is.

reddit.com
u/k34-yoop — 5 days ago
▲ 21 r/GCTS+3 crossposts

Jewels in the GCTS Q1 2026 earnings

​

Ok. So I'm on record as saying I didn't expect much in the way of Q1 earnings and that's pretty much what happened.

But there's some jewels here I want to tease out and comment on. So let's get started

**1. Multi-phase pathway.**

At least twice in the press release it's mentioned that they they have multiple phases with one of the largest satellite communications providers for "next generation equipment". This is a key tell of just how large the platform reference agreement is. Translating n: This isn't a year or two on one product. This is a comprehensive, multi-phased build out that will see GCTS tech used in all these services and products. GCTS is the chip at the center of all this. I've previously speculated that this is Amazonstar. If it is, the one possible product line is Amazon LEO Nano ( aka..the next generation of LEO!! ). Now just sit back for a moment and think about the scale that Amazon can deliver in terms of volume orders. Undoubtedly, if it is Amazon, and it is Leo Nano...then they will market, distribute it and service it via Amazon's preeminent ecommerce platform. It's not unreasonable to think Amazon could scale sales, usage of Leo Nano to 100s of millions of several years. That's just ONE phase. Am I speculating? Yes. But I'm using logic, reason and research. You be the judge.

  1. Ramp in R&D in Q3. Why is that good?

A quietly understand question from one analyst uncovered that R&D spending will increase measurably in Q3 2026. So why would that be good? After all that subtracts from earnings doesn't it? The key here is timing. Follow my logic. Amazon is under pressure from the FCC to launch 1000+ satellites by July 2026. The FCC has granted them KU/Ka band spectrum for satellite broadband ( this is same spectrum band that Starlink uses, although their frequencies are different ). If they don't start using that spectrum, then the FCC has threatened to take it away and hand it over to arch nemesis: SpaceX. So Amazon is in a hurry. You can see this through their satellite launches. You can see them signing launch contracts with basically anyone who has a rocket. Including SpaceX!! Bezos will get it done. And after he gets the sats up, the FCC will want to see him USING the spectrum. It's not enough to launch satellites. So in Q3,Q4 of 2026...Amazon LEO Nano rollouts need to commence at full blast right after the last sat is orbiting. This is where the R&D expenses come in during Q3. My guess is that these expenses will be GCTS engineers working on that rollout with Amazonstar. It should be noted that the KU/Ka band spectrum is not the same as the band 53 tERRESTRIAL and NTn spectrum acquired with Globalstar. This latter spectrum sits in the L,C,and S bands. It's not in danger of being take away because Apple is using a big (80%) chunk of the NTN portion today on Globalstar 's satellites. That being said anothe pressure point for Amazon and the need for spending on engineering with GCTS might be to integrate band 53 terrestrial and non-terrestrial across their warehouses, drones and logistics fleet for tracking and supply chain. This would be another "multi-phased" pathway.

  1. How big is this?

It was said on the call and it's obvious from the jump in revenue that 5G chip deployments have ramped. Analysts weren't too bothered by (.15) loss because the ramp here becomes profitable in 2027. However, I don't think these analysts truly understand the sheer scale of what might be happening. During Q4 the satellite customer orders were mentioned as "low millions" annually. But if this really is Amazon and they really push Leo Nano, it could grow to 10s of millions annually quickly. This doesn't even include the warehouse/logistics pathway, or any other future planned service/product ( Alexa, Prometheus, etc ).

  1. GCTS too critical to leave as a separate company.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that all this leaves GCTS as wayyyyy too valuable to leave as an independent entity. Amazon, if that's the satcom company, has a history of vertical integration if it fits their stratrgic direction. Well..it doesn't get more strategic that providing the reference platform technology stack for all your OEM/OED suppliers. GCTS has the very chip and patents that would provide comms across all products and services for this satcom company. How much is that worth? $1B $5? Globalstar was bought out for $11.5B

The last thing I'll note is that the CFO mentioned that 5 to 7 customers are ordering their chips. I think this is a really important clue to GCT Semi's future. After all, the company's financials are ...well..not so hot. These other customers surely know this. But yet they agreed to work with GCT anyway. Why? Well ..it's anyone's guess, but I believe these customers know that in a few years GCT will be in much better position. Even if it's gets purchases, that too may benefit these customers as they could then find themselves in partnership with one of the "largest satellite communications companies". Gogo would certainly make a nice new product line within Amazon's competing service to Starlink.

Earnings announcement: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260512443937/en/GCT-Semiconductor-Holding-Inc.-Provides-Business-Update-and-Reports-First-Quarter-2026-Financial-Results

Earnings Call transcript: https://www.benzinga.com/insights/news/26/05/52509027/full-transcript-gct-semiconductor-hldgs-q1-2026-earnings-call

8K: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sec.irpass.cc/2932/0000929638-26-001816.htm

10Q: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sec.irpass.cc/2932/0001193125-26-219536.htm

u/k34-yoop — 10 days ago
▲ 2 r/GCTS

GCTS - Q1 2026 Earnings reflections May 12

Earnings announcement: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260512443937/en/GCT-Semiconductor-Holding-Inc.-Provides-Business-Update-and-Reports-First-Quarter-2026-Financial-Results

Earnings Call transcript: https://www.benzinga.com/insights/news/26/05/52509027/full-transcript-gct-semiconductor-hldgs-q1-2026-earnings-call

8K: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sec.irpass.cc/2932/0000929638-26-001816.htm

10Q: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sec.irpass.cc/2932/0001193125-26-219536.htm

Ok. So I'm on record as saying I didn't expect much in the way of Q1 earnings and that's pretty much what happened.

But there's some jewels here I want to tease out and comment on. So let's get started

1. Multi-phase pathway.

At least twice in the press release it's mentioned that they they have multiple phases with one of the largest satellite communications providers for "next generation equipment". This is a key tell of just how large the platform reference agreement is. Translating n: This isn't a year or two on one product. This is a comprehensive, multi-phased build out that will see GCTS tech used in all these services and products. GCTS is the chip at the center of all this. I've previously speculated that this is Amazonstar. If it is, the one possible product line is Amazon LEO Nano ( aka..the next generation of LEO!! ). Now just sit back for a moment and think about the scale that Amazon can deliver in terms of volume orders. Undoubtedly, if it is Amazon, and it is Leo Nano...then they will market, distribute it and service it via Amazon's preeminent ecommerce platform. It's not unreasonable to think Amazon could scale sales, usage of Leo Nano to 100s of millions of several years. That's just ONE phase. Am I speculating? Yes. But I'm using logic, reason and research. You be the judge.

  1. Ramp in R&D in Q3. Why is that good?

A quietly understand question from one analyst uncovered that R&D spending will increase measurably in Q3 2026. So why would that be good? After all that subtracts from earnings doesn't it? The key here is timing. Follow my logic. Amazon is under pressure from the FCC to launch 1000+ satellites by July 2026. The FCC has granted them KU/Ka band spectrum for satellite broadband ( this is same spectrum band that Starlink uses, although their frequencies are different ). If they don't start using that spectrum, then the FCC has threatened to take it away and hand it over to arch nemesis: SpaceX. So Amazon is in a hurry. You can see this through their satellite launches. You can see them signing launch contracts with basically anyone who has a rocket. Including SpaceX!! Bezos will get it done. And after he gets the sats up, the FCC will want to see him USING the spectrum. It's not enough to launch satellites. So in Q3,Q4 of 2026...Amazon LEO Nano rollouts need to commence at full blast right after the last sat is orbiting. This is where the R&D expenses come in during Q3. My guess is that these expenses will be GCTS engineers working on that rollout with Amazonstar. It should be noted that the KU/Ka band spectrum is not the same as the band 53 tERRESTRIAL and NTn spectrum acquired with Globalstar. This latter spectrum sits in the L,C,and S bands. It's not in danger of being take away because Apple is using a big (80%) chunk of the NTN portion today on Globalstar 's satellites. That being said anothe pressure point for Amazon and the need for spending on engineering with GCTS might be to integrate band 53 terrestrial and non-terrestrial across their warehouses, drones and logistics fleet for tracking and supply chain. This would be another "multi-phased" pathway.

  1. How big is this?

It was said on the call and it's obvious from the jump in revenue that 5G chip deployments have ramped. Analysts weren't too bothered by (.15) loss because the ramp here becomes profitable in 2027. However, I don't think these analysts truly understand the sheer scale of what might be happening. During Q4 the satellite customer orders were mentioned as "low millions" annually. But if this really is Amazon and they really push Leo Nano, it could grow to 10s of millions annually quickly. This doesn't even include the warehouse/logistics pathway, or any other future planned service/product ( Alexa, Prometheus, etc ).

  1. GCTS too critical to leave as a separate company.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that all this leaves GCTS as wayyyyy too valuable to leave as an independent entity. Amazon, if that's the satcom company, has a history of vertical integration if it fits their stratrgic direction. Well..it doesn't get more strategic that providing the reference platform technology stack for all your OEM/OED suppliers. GCTS has the very chip and patents that would provide comms across all products and services for this satcom company. How much is that worth? $1B $5? Globalstar was bought out for $11.5B

The last thing I'll note is that the CFO mentioned that 5 to 7 customers are ordering their chips. I think this is a really important clue to GCT Semi's future. After all, the company's financials are ...well..not so hot. These other customers surely know this. But yet they agreed to work with GCT anyway. Why? Well ..it's anyone's guess, but I believe these customers know that in a few years GCT will be in much better position. Even if it's gets purchases, that too may benefit these customers as they could then find themselves in partnership with one of the "largest satellite communications companies". Gogo would certainly make a nice new product line within Amazon's competing service to Starlink.

u/k34-yoop — 10 days ago
▲ 21 r/GCTS+2 crossposts

GCTS: What to look for on May 12

GCT Semiconductor has become a sudden sensation in the chip world for good reason.

Salient speculation has led many of us to follow the bread crumbs, read the tea leaves and deduce that GCTS is on the cusp of receiving massive, exclusive and sticky orders from "one of the largest satellite communications companies" in the world.

The reference platform agreement announced last week was definitive. This was the satcom provider saying: You're chip designs and tech is so instrumental to our future plans and optimized to our spectrum that we are placing it at the center of our ecosystem and we want all OEMs we work with to integrate it.

In Q4 2025 conf call the company openly stated they saw "low million" unit volume ANNUALLY from this satcom providers demand. Is that 1 million, 2 million.... 4 million?

EPS modeling by B.Riley and HC Wainwright heading into 2027 suggest this is probably in the 2 to 3 million range, which at .18 -.20 EPS in 2027 would value the company very conservatively at $3-4.00 per share.

But there are other things to consider and the valuation could explode much higher in the coming weeks/months. Let's look at these:

  1. Who is the satcom provider?

I'm on record as having speculates this is the combined Amazon / Globalstar. Further, I believe at least one of the use cases here is to provide an internal network ( terrestrial 5G and NTN ) using Globalstar's band 53 globally harmonized spectrum. If I'm right than this network would replace their use of a global amalgamation of MNOs across the globe, giving Amazon consistency in quality and security of comms for their logistics, warehousing and supply chain. In fact, this is probably the primary reason Amazon wanted to buy Globalstar to begin with. The key link to this speculation is in two pieces of evidence: Globalstar 's R200M module, which uses GCTS chips for seamless terrestrial and NTN comms...and an announcement by Paul Jacobs in 2023 that Globalstar was working with one of the "largest global retailers" in the world. Additionally, because the platform reference agreement has come very quickly and the demand is on the back of the recent Amazon Globalstar merger...the timing is almost perfectly aligned.

Why wouldn't it be Iridium, Eutelesat, ASTS, or SpaceX?

Iridium definitely has worked with GCTS in the past to develop an open standard for NTN. This was a request in the initial early days of D2D by Android handset makers. They agreed they didn't want proprietary Iridium chips in every Android device, so this forced Iridium, if it wanted to compete in D2D, to adopt and promote an open standard. The internal name for Iridium's effort is Project Stardust. It's possible that Iridium's satcom will provide incremental additional demand via Android handset makers and Google ( via Pixel ).

Gogo's new Galileo system, delivered via Airspan uses GCTS Semi's chips. The Galileo architecture used Eutelesat/Oneweb as the satcom backbone...and 5G terrestrial MNO providers for tower comms. Gogo's pivot here makes their new platform a transatlantic jewel and competitor to SpaceX/Starlink. Linking up with the European version of Starlink (;the combined Eutelesat/ Oneweb ) was key because Europe's business and political establishment grew disenchanted with Elon after his right wing political acknowledgement. While Gogo's system represents demand for business jet fleets, I don't see it being the source of millions of chips annually.

ASTS doesn't even have a functioning constellation. They have 6 of 90 or maybe even 180 planned satellites in orbit. I'm on record as having said the company will face bankruptcy before they ever become operational. Look for several high profile MNOs to break ranks as the engineering mess becomes more clear. 3 satellite designs in 10 years.

SpaceX could certainly be a demand source. Elon has stated numerous times that he might create his own phone to complete with Apple. With the upcoming IPO of SpaceX, the funding necessary for building out a SpaceX phone would be available. This is an interesting angle.

  1. Could GCTS be bought out and if so what would be the price?

If I'm right and it's Amazon, than there could be a buyout of GCT Semi. Why? Amazon makes their own silicon. But they do this only for key, core, strategic use cases ( their AWS stack as an example ). If Amazon plans to use GCT Semi patents and architecture in all their ecommerce operations and potentially other use cases ( Leo Nano, Alexa, Prometheus etc ) than GCT Semiconductor 's position begins to look more and more like a strategic fit for Amazon. What would that be worth? This is hard to gauge. But it's reasonable to think Amazon could throw $800M to $3B at GCT Semi to secure their future comms architecture, bring chip production in house and avoid patent litigation. You can do the math on this: 7x to 30x.

Now...if SpaceX wants to create some noise and get back at Bezos for stealing Globalstar from Elon's attempts to take over band 53, then it could get very interesting.

  1. What other use cases could drive GCT Semi demand? Could this be the next Qualcomm?

Just like the Nvidia explosion with GPU demand from AI growrh, comms chip makers are sitting at the cusp of a new paradigm in communications that I call Global Connectivity ( https://www.reddit.com/r/GSAT/comments/1j8ndjq/global\_connectivity\_the\_foundational\_disruptor\_of/ ) that will drive an explosion of new communications chip demand. We are transitioning to a world of giant global network operators and away from regional providers. The traditional 5G chip modem was focused on terrestrial towers, but this new global architecture requires a multi band/multi orbit /multi antenna modem design that can switch seamlessly. This is the genius of GCT's patents. The new standard is already being baked into the 6G standards development. GCTs focus is less on handsets though. They avoid the direct competition with Mediatek and Qualcomm. But that's ok, because IOT ( think drones, humanoid robots, driverless cars... ) represents the real growth engine for 6G global connectivity.

GCTS, even without any buyout sits in a very smart spot. Qualcomm and Mediatek might even see them as too much to ignore and offer their own buyout.

GCTS has other customers I didn't mention who use their 4G designs and have likely explored using their 5G and IOT chips too.

Ok. So what should we watch for next week?

Next week's earnings are unlikely to be a good story. GCTS is surviving on selling warrants to clients and agreeing to predatory, dilutive offerings ( check the Indigo and Obsidian financing deals. Is it just mean or do these financing firms' names sound a bit ominous?).

A repair on their income statement comes in 2nd half of 2026 with break even in 2027. a key thing to watch/look for: definitive 2027 EPS guidance.

Another key thing to watch: other customer deals that drive demand. this would indicate that everyone sees a long-term future for GCT technology and the scary current financial picture is only temporary.

Also watch for any slips or hints that a strategic review or negotiation is taking place. This could blow the stack off the stock and vault it 10x within minutes of any credible information.

Lastly, I would expect some kind of short term financing arrangement to be mentioned where this satcom company helps to stabilize GCT'S balance sheet.

None of what I say is financial advice. I would encourage everyone to do their own research.

reddit.com
u/k34-yoop — 12 days ago
▲ 4 r/GCTS

Note... Globalstar is now part of Amazon. So their views are Amazon's views. Amazons main goals in buying GSAT were likely to create a vast global private 5G network for their entire distribution, logistics and supply chain. Currently they have to use a hodgepodge of regional MNOs with fractured hardware and network support. Owning their own globalized terrestrial and non-terrestrial spectrum now advances Amazon into standardizing the network they use globally and ditching the telcos and MNOs.

u/k34-yoop — 22 days ago
▲ 22 r/GCTS+2 crossposts

​

It's been a while since I posted, so let's look at some the recent events and derive any insights.  

Front and center is the Globalstar buyout by Amazon.  We all thought SpaceX would be the front runner here.  Elon & gang had been doing everything short of buying Globalstar over the last 6 years in an attempt to wield control over Globalstar's premium spectrum assets.  But the time ran out by 2026.  SpaceX tried in vain to rush an IPO of historic magnitude, and most of us saw this as partially motivated by a need for cash and publicly traded securities they could use in an offer to Globalstar.  

So what happened? Why did Amazon win the bid and not SpaceX? Why wasn't the price higher?  Why just 11.5 billion?  After all EchoStar sold fallow, undeveloped spectrum for $17 billion.  

The sale price for Globalstar is average. It's not a steal.  I'm on record as saying $20B+ was a fair deal for the most valuable satcom + terrestrial spectrum assets on the planet.  I was surprised by only $11.5 billion.  But the low price probably had less to do with what Jay Monroe & Globalstar shareholders negotiated, and more with what Apple wanted.   Apple didn't care about the price being offered to purchase Globalstar.  They cared about who would be the best partner for their ultimate plans to create a vast network for all their devices.  A hybrid MVNO. They want to retain control. To that end Amazon stands out as the better partner for several reasons:  

  1. Amazon isn't tethered or linked to an MNO.  SpaceX is connected to many.  Chief among them: T-Mobile.  This is a really insightful point.  It uncovers a very clear strategic direction I, and others, have brought up several times: Apple is going it alone.  They will create a network for all their devices, just like Steve Jobs wanteda long time ago and the MNOs won't be allowed in.

  2. Amazon, via Blue Origin, has a budding launch capability too.  Albeit not as developed as SpaceX.  But that's ok.  Because Blue Origin is hungry and eager, they can be controlled.  SpaceX can't be.  SpaceX often plays scheduling games and moves their priorities ahead of their customers.  This is a real annoyance.  

  3. Amazon has, arguably, the largest and most developed distribution and retail capability on the planet. This really comes in handy if your plan is to dump the MNOs as sales channels. Imagine a future in 3 years where Apple devices are sold pre-configured to connect to an Apple network.  No MNO needed. Just pay Apple $10 a month  for unlimited everything.  Now you know why the MNOs were backing ASTS.

  4. Amazon doesn't really require Apple to fund infrastructure/capital expenditures to upgrade the satellite and ground stations.

   

In the end, for Apple, they needed a partner that would align to their strategic objectives.  A global Apple network could create many 100s of billions of extra revenue for the company via fees and increased Apple product sales.. This is the diamond in their eyes.

But it isn't just one way.  Believe it or not, Amazon didn't enter this arrangement for $200M payment each year from Apple and to listen to John Ternus & team needle them over quality and precision. There was another angle:

  1. Globalstar's terrestrial spectrum and XCOM ran can now be used to enable a global, super secure, high performance private network for all of Amazon's distribution, logistics, phyiscal AI and warehouses. Rewind back to 2023 when Paul Jacobs mentioned working with a "global retailer".  Now we know who that really was. With the AI era dawning, a global autonomous delivery fleet that communicates via Globalstar's network ( terretrial + NTN ) was the final key.

  2. Amazon LEO gains deep experience in satcom from a trusted, and respected player in the industry via the Globalstar team.

  3. Amazon's ecommerce group might gain preferential distribution partner for Apple products globally: including an Apple network subscription package.  The volume of traffic this brings can't be underweighted. It's not linear.  It's exponential.  These customers spend a lot of money.  They like expensive, stylish things.

Is this it?  Will SpaceX counter offer?

If you're Elon you have to be more than just a little pissed.  He's been courting, cajoling, threatening Apple / Globalstar / FCC for at least 6 years. But this isn't a time for emotion.  A clear head is required.  Amazon and Apple are a formidable duopoly to go up against. Cash rich. Able to raise vast sums of capital in the blink of an eye. Profitable.  And very influential.   As I highlighted above, if I'm right, the decision mostly came down to what Apple wanted. So any bigger bid, isn't going to change Apple's mind.  What would change their mind?  Maybe one thing:

- A controlling stake in SpaceX.

I've said many times in previous posts that Apple wants control.  Far from "dumping Globalstar" as several noted analysts and rumor mongers kept suggesting, Apple deepened its investment and control over Globalstar.  This control tells me Apple's plans are very strategic, wrapped around Globalstar's spectrum assets and core to their vision for  the future. They likely come close to realizing Steve Jobs' original vision for the iPhone to have its own network, controlled by Apple...not the MNOs.  If I'm right then they aren't going to let that go. A controlling stake in SpaceX might be enough for Apple to rethink things.  But does it outweigh the benefits they get with Amazon?  

Elon would have to take a back seat on Apple's plans.  He would not be in the driver's seat. Does that align with his ambitions for Starlink and SpaceX?  

GCT Semiconductor

A likely surprise winner in the Amazon buyout is probably GCTS.  Prior to the buyout announcement of Globalstar analysts had been targeting $3-5 for the company's shares based on pending massive order for their chips.  So who is that order for?

Well The RM200M module that Globalstar released recently provides two way ( meaning seamless terrestrial & Non-Terrestrial/satellite ) comms for IOT.  That module uses the GCTS GDM7243i chip.  Now here's the really important part:  GCTS optimized this chip to work with one specific spectrum band -> band 53 ( Globalstar...now Amazon's MSS & terrestrial spectrum ).

The lights should be flashing and bells going off in your head.

Does anyone really think Amazon isn't going to use the spectrum assets they just bought?!!??  Or the chips that are optimized to use that spectrum?!!!??    

To be fair Qualcomm and Mediatek also play in this space too. But their products ( the 212S and the MT6825 respectively ) are general two way products. With GCTS, Amazonstar gets control and customization to their needs.  Something the big guys don't like to do.

If everything plays out the way it seems, then GCTS could be a double digit stock by 2027.  The explosion in GPU chip maker valuations might be followed up by another round of explosion in two way comm chip sales as everyone begins to realize they need global connectivity to integrate with those gigantic AI data centers.

Iridium

In my last post, I said Iridium would likely get bought out.  It seems that's either happening or going to happen.  Most of us felt $40-50 was a fair price and the market seems to be trending that direction.  Iridium offers a very nice slice of MSS specturm.  But Iridium is not a  1:1 replacement of Globalstar as many think.  Iridum doesn't have any terrestrial spectrum.  Additionally, its MSS spectrum is ~25% utilized today.  At the time Apple partnered with Globalstar, Globalstar's MSS spectrum might have been 5% utilized. Additonally,one of Iridium's primary customers is the DOD.  So good luck trying to kick them off or telling them how you're going to re-engineer everything. That being said, Iridium's business is being gobbled up by SpaceX and they need a strategic move soon before financial pressures force a fire sale.

u/k34-yoop — 28 days ago