
Anapass trading report ref GCTS
Trust in the process brothers and sisters

Trust in the process brothers and sisters
These 8 satellites are probably part of the delayed launch mentioned in the recent GCTS earnings call. Do you expect the market to react?
The most important takeaway from GCT’s Q2 call is that the unnamed satellite customer appears to be very close to commercialization, but GCT still cannot name them because it is waiting for the customer’s approval.
GCT says satellite/NTN is one of its two largest near-term volume opportunities, alongside terrestrial broadband.
Management says there is “a lot of latent activity that has not ramped yet” in satellite/NTN.
GCT has secured wafer capacity through Q1 2027, specifically in anticipation of what management calls a “relatively large ramp.”
The company expects H2 2026 shipments to exceed H1, with Q1 2027 also having meaningful visibility.
When asked directly about the unnamed satellite provider, CEO John Schlaefer said they will eventually disclose the name, but they are waiting for the customer's “green light” because of NDAs.
The key sentence: “as soon as they launch, they will be less sensitive about that.”
When pressed on timing, he said disclosure “could be Q4, it could be Q1."
Amazon has confirmed beta service in five countries (United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany & Canada) starting late 2026 or early 2027. Amazon fits with Q1/Q4.
This is not financial advice, speculation only. I hold shares in GCTS.
Sources
Earnings call:
https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/gct-semiconductor-holding-inc-gcts-050259490.html
Kuiper availability:
https://orbitalradar.com/satellite-internet/kuiper-availability
$GCTS I thought I would map out our currently known revenue streams so you guys are reminded of the potential we have.
Major satellite partner - Management guided "million units plus" annual shipment volumes once this partnership ramps. At a low ASP of $75, that is $75 million annual revenue alone.
MaxLinear - This one is hard to size. No volume, ASP or customer commitment has been disclosed on either side. If this converts it extends GCT's terrestrial broadband pillar.
Skylo / GSAT - Globalstar already uses the GDM7243i chip in the RM200M product. The part worth diving deeper into is Skylo's proposed ANT4 filing, which would authorise up to 250 million devices operating on a spectrum that is majority Globalstar owned (1610mhz-1617mhz exclusively and 2483mhz-2500mhz) which Skylo's existing ANT1-3 device categories already run on. GCT supplies two chips relevant here, GDM7243i, which covers 600-960MHz and 1.7 - 2.7ghz, enough to reach the S band portion but falling short on the L band linkup. The other chip being GDM7243SL, which spans 380mhz to 3800mhz which comfortably covers both bands in full. This chip is positioned as a low cost single chip solution, using managements guidance that 5g ASP is roughly 4x 4g chips, a reasonable ASP of these chips is $20-40 per unit. If we calculate ANT4's 250 million devices and GCT captures even 2% of this at $20, that's 5 million devices and $100 M revenue. The uncertainty lies not in the technical fit, it's that no design win has been disclosed for this specific chip on this specific opportunity, unlike GDM7243i's position in the RM200M. This should be treated as a contingent on both FCC approval of ANT4 and a GCT design win, not a probable near term revenue line.
Current Price & re-rate math - GCTS currently is trading around $2 to $2.35, of a market roughly $170 - 195M and an EV of roughly $195-$220M once you account for the $55.1M debt and $30 million cash on the balance sheet. Put against the analyst consensus revenue of $21.6M, that's about 9-10x forward EV/sales, not cheap and not expensive.
Price To Earnings (P/E) - 1,000,000 annual units would result in roughly $75m annual revenue, with a gross margin of 50% this leaves $37.5m. After assuming opex rises to support this we could be left with $12.5m, after taxes $10.5m. EPS = 10,500,000 (net income) / 90,000,000 (diluted shares) = $0.117 EPS. Growth semi plays entering mass commercialisation command 50 - 60x forward P/E resulting in $6.44 per share.
The jump from 2 to 6-7 represents a single contract execution, the path to 20 or even 30+ occurs when GCT transitions from a single supplier into the platform for multiple hybrid networks. Eg core satellite partner, skylo IOT, terrestrial broadband resulting in $200m ish revenue. $200m x 0.52 = $104m gross profit. If OPEX scaled even more to cover this eg $40m, we'd be left with an EBIT of $64,000,000, post taxes $50m. EPS = 50,000,000 / 90,000,000 = $0.555 EPS. A foward P/E of 40-50x applied to this yields $22.2 to $27.5 per share.
Please note I made a few assumptions here. In the calculations they are fully diluted (90m) shares. Currently, there are about 66m shares. If GCTS current cash runway allows them to survive without diluting this would positively impact the EPS pushing GCTS to $34+ per share. To make GCTS really take off, they need to diversify with at least one additional major platform.
There are a few things I will keep a strong eye on with this stock -
Skylo must officially approve GCT's GDM7243SL in their network. - https://www.skylo.tech/certified-devices
Amazon Leo deployment timelines - Amazon has already requested an extension. GCT's near-term upside depends on reference design adoption ahead of those constellation ramps.
Run rate - in H1 their revenue was $2.89m, with an operating cash outflow of $4m a month. They need to address this directly or they will continue utilising the ATM.
This is not financial advice, this is my own DD and I encourage you to do your own.
12764 shares @ 1.6 avg
There is also a great community on Stocktwits
GCTS- we have a delay of 1 -2 quarters (shifted customer deployment schedules)
ASTS - we are delaying the launch’s 1-2 quarters
Several independent pieces of information line up unusually well: GCT's satellite contracts, its new 5G/NTN chip architecture, the AlphaChips manufacturing commitment, Globalstar's relationship with GCT, Amazon's acquisition of Globalstar, and SpaceX's rapid expansion into terrestrial + satellite mobile connectivity.
This is not financial advice, speculation only, I hold shares in GCTS.
The question is: Who needs exactly the type of 4G/5G + NTN + terrestrial connectivity silicon that GCT is now preparing to manufacture at scale?
On January 29, 2026, GCT announced a licensing agreement with a major satellite communications provider.
The important language is that GCT's 4G and 5G chipsets are being integrated into the provider's user equipment for both satellite and terrestrial networks, with a pathway toward direct-to-satellite applications.
Then, on May 7, GCT announced a follow-up agreement with the same satellite provider.
This time, GCT would provide a 5G/4G reference design intended to accelerate development of next-generation user equipment and allow OEM/ODM manufacturers to produce equipment more quickly for high-speed communications across satellite and terrestrial networks. That is important, not a small proof-of-concept.
GCT silicon - reference platform - OEM/ODM - potentially large-scale equipment production.
And GCT has indicated that the opportunity could eventually represent million-plus annual units.
- GDM7262X — NR-Lite
- GDM7265X — NR-Standard
- GDM7259X — NR-Ultra
- Sub-6 GHz RF products
- mmWave IF/RF products
- NTN capability
The chip I find particularly interesting for the satellite thesis is GDM7262X.It is positioned as the lower-cost NR-Lite modem and includes NTN capability. If you're talking about millions of devices, you don't necessarily want the biggest, most expensive modem.
Increasingly interesting is low cost + low power + 5G + NTN + terrestrial connectivity. That is the type of architecture that could make sense for mass-market satellite/terrestrial devices.
GCT's long-term ASIC partner AlphaChips entered a procurement arrangement worth approximately $18 million.
GCT is simultaneously:
- expanding its satellite agreements;
- developing its new 5G/NTN platforms
- creating a reference design for OEM/ODM production
- preparing for commercial shipments;
- and committing significant capital to semiconductor production.
This is a commercial ramp preparation, not an early-stage R&D project.
We still don't know exactly which GCT chip the AlphaChips order covers, so I would not claim that the order proves GDM7262X is being manufactured for Amazon or SpaceX. But it is a very important supporting piece.
In March 2025, GCT announced that Globalstar's RM200M product would use GCT's GDM7243i IoT chip, with future products planned around GCT 4G and 5G IoT chipsets to support Globalstar's satellite network.
Then, in April 2026, Amazon announced that it would acquire Globalstar.
Amazon specifically said the acquisition includes Globalstar's:
- satellite operations;
- infrastructure;
- MSS spectrum;
- and other satellite assets.
Amazon said these assets would help expand Amazon Leo and enable direct-to-device connectivity.
That creates a very interesting chain:
GCT + Globalstar
+
Amazon acquires Globalstar
+
Globalstar assets become part of Amazon Leo
+
Amazon builds D2D
+
GCT's existing satellite/cellular technology potentially becomes relevant to the Amazon ecosystem. That is not speculation about a random connection, the first link is documented.
Amazon has proposed a new direct-to-device constellation of up to 5,105 satellites.
The purpose is to connect compatible mobile devices directly from space for:
- voice
- messaging
- data
- emergency services
- and connectivity outside terrestrial cellular coverage.
Amazon says deployment is targeted to begin in 2028, and the complete Leo network could eventually support hundreds of millions of customer endpoints.
This is extremely important for GCT because their new architecture is not simply:
"satellite modem."
It is:
4G/5G + terrestrial + NTN.
The exact technological problem Amazon's D2D system has to solve.
Therefore, I do NOT believe the thesis should be:
"GCT is replacing Amazon's Prometheus chip" cause it doesn't make much sense.Prometheus is Amazon's own custom baseband technology for its Leo terminal architecture.
Instead, I think the more interesting possibility is that GCT operates alongside Amazon's proprietary technology.
A much more technically believable scenario:
Prometheus
Amazon Leo broadband terminal architecture
GCT modem/RF
Cellular/NTN/D2D equipment and potentially third-party OEM devices.
It needs to interact with: Ordinary cellular devices, and mobile network operators while extending coverage through satellites.
Amazon explicitly says its D2D system will partner with mobile network operators and extend cellular connectivity beyond terrestrial coverage. That's where GCT could potentially fit.
GCT doesn't need to supply the satellite itself, or replace Prometheus. It could supply the cellular/NTN silicon inside equipment participating in the ecosystem.
But SpaceX's strategy is becoming a strong match for GCT's technology.
SpaceX recently acquired approximately 65 MHz of spectrum from EchoStar and has announced plans to turn Starlink Mobile into a much broader terrestrial + satellite mobile network. Reuters reports that SpaceX intends to compete directly with major U.S. wireless carriers, while using Starlink infrastructure to support the terrestrial network.
SpaceX's spectrum holdings span approximately 1.7–2.2 GHz. And GCT's RF portfolio covers a broad 400 MHz–7 GHz range.
More importantly, GCT's newer modem architecture explicitly supports NTN.
So the architecture looks like:
Starlink
terrestrial cellular
+
satellite NTN
+
GCT 5G/NTN modem
= A good conceptual match.
That creates a massive potential device ecosystem:
- smartphones;
- IoT
- vehicles
- industrial equipment
- robotics
- autonomous systems
- enterprise equipment
- remote infrastructure.
That's where GCT's low-cost NTN/5G architecture becomes appealing.
The idea isn't that GCT will compete with Nvidia on AI compute. It's that AI creates enormous amounts of data at the edge. Robots, autonomous systems, industrial machines and remote devices need to move that data.
The architecture becomes:
AI device
+
GCT 5G/NTN modem
+
terrestrial network
And/or
satellite network
+
cloud / AI infrastructure
This could be especially interesting for Starlink. Imagine an autonomous machine, robot, self driving car, operating somewhere with unreliable terrestrial coverage.
The ideal device doesn't need separate systems for cellular when available or satellite when cellular disappears. It can have a unified connectivity layer, the problem GCT's terrestrial + NTN architecture is designed to address.
Scenario 1: The unnamed customer is Amazon/Leo or an Amazon-controlled ecosystem.
The strongest evidence is:
- GCT already works with Globalstar.
- Amazon is acquiring Globalstar.
- Amazon is building D2D.
- Amazon wants hundreds of millions
- of endpoints.
- GCT is developing 4G/5G + NTN silicon.
Scenario 2: The unnamed customer is SpaceX/Starlink. The strongest evidence is:
- Starlink is becoming a hybrid terrestrial + satellite mobile network.
- SpaceX has acquired 65 MHz of spectrum.
- The spectrum sits within the broad frequency envelope of GCT's RF portfolio.
- GCT's new silicon supports NTN.
- Starlink is targeting a huge mobile/IoT ecosystem.
Technically compelling, but there is ono documented GCT–SpaceX relationship.
Scenario 3: BOTH, the scenario that would make the GCTS thesis explode.
GCT could theoretically become a semiconductor supplier to multiple competing satellite ecosystems.
Amazon and SpaceX don't need to use identical satellites or identical network architecture. They could both use GCT silicon at the device/OEM layer.
That would mean GCT isn't betting on which satellite company wins, it potentially benefits from both sides of the satellite-mobile race.
"Here's a reference architecture that OEM/ODM manufacturers can use to accelerate production."
That changes the possible business model. GCT could become something like the connectivity platform underneath multiple device manufacturers.
If one OEM makes an Amazon-compatible product and another makes a Starlink-compatible product, GCT could theoretically sell silicon to both. You don't have to own the network to profit from the network.
Amazon has stronger existing relationship evidence, while Starlink currently has stronger evidence of a rapidly expanding terrestrial + satellite mobile architecture.
If a GCT chip appears in an FCC filing, module certification, device teardown or manufacturer document connected to Amazon Leo or SpaceX, the thesis gets much stronger.
GCT is becoming a specialized connectivity-silicon supplier for the transition from terrestrial-only networks to hybrid terrestrial + satellite networks. A transition pursued by multiple enormous companies.
Amazon is building Leo + Globalstar D2D.
SpaceX is building Starlink Mobile.
Both are moving toward the same broad concept: Connect people and machines everywhere, whether terrestrial coverage exists or not.
GCT's core technology sits directly in that connectivity layer.
This is not financial advice, speculation only, I hold shares in GCTS.
Sources:
SpaceX's plan to combine terrestrial cellular infrastructure with Starlink.
https://www.theverge.com/science/975480/spacex-mobile-terrestrial-cellphone-company
GCT satellite licensing agreement:
https://www.gctsemi.com/1-29-25-licensing-agreement
GCT satellite reference platform:
https://www.gctsemi.com/5-7-26-signed-contract-satellite
GCT–Globalstar relationship:
https://www.gctsemi.com/3-4-25-globalstar-mwc
Amazon–Globalstar acquisition:
Amazon Leo D2D plans:
https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/amazon-leo/amazon-leo-direct-to-device-satellite-service-explained
Reuters on SpaceX/Starlink Mobile:
SpaceX spectrum transaction:
$GCTS Here is what stood out to me this earnings:
- The Customer Delay: Confirmed the delay is on the customers side (which major provider had a delay🤫).
- Shipment volumes were still up 71%, the hardware is moving into integration.
- Satellites will be their largest business stream heading into 2027, plus expansion into gov contracts / industrial drones.
-Production Capacity: Foundry capacity is fully prepaid and locked through EOY (that april filing we found)
- Cash flow is a lot healthier this quarter, can easily cover any unexpected expenses without going out of business.
Overall this does not change my thesis at all, I will continue to hold / buy. If anything I am even more bullish now they have finally given us some solid guidance.