u/kappacat-

Image 1 — Examples of EVLF LSE / EFVL LSI / FLEV EIE combinations.
Image 2 — Examples of EVLF LSE / EFVL LSI / FLEV EIE combinations.
Image 3 — Examples of EVLF LSE / EFVL LSI / FLEV EIE combinations.

Examples of EVLF LSE / EFVL LSI / FLEV EIE combinations.

I used a translation tool to translate Image 1:

Types in Psychosophy and Socionics do not depend on one another, i.e. any combination of types is possible. However, a Psychosophy type influences the manifestation of a Socionic type. Combinations of types can be harmonious or disharmonious.

Example of a disharmonious combination:

A person with the Socionics type LSE and the Psychosophy type EVLF. High Emotion leads the person to consider themselves an expert in aspects ■ □ ▲ △, which in their Model A are located in the low-dimensional functions. As a result, on the one hand, the objective dimensionality of the functions does not allow them to be adequately competent in the sphere of emotions, as well as in the sphere of intuition, while their subjective perception of their own abilities tells them otherwise.

On the other hand, low Logic and Physics make them doubt their own abilities in the aspects ■ □ ● ○. This is a disharmonious combination of types, which can cause its possessor many difficulties in life.

——————————————————————
The website for Images 2 and 3 is here: https://bestsocionics.com/ask-14/⁠

If you’re interested, feel free to check it out. I think this explains very well why all kinds of combinations are possible.

Basically:

A person’s objective abilities in different information domains are described by their Socionics TIM. The TIM indicates what a person is capable of doing.

PY, on the other hand, describes the subjective significance of different domains of existence, showing what a person wants.

It should be noted that information domains (information aspects) and domains of existence are different entities, even though they have similar names in terminology.)

u/kappacat- — 2 days ago

How strong do you guys think the correlation between Socionics and PY is?

I remember that SoL explicitly states that Socionics Fe and PY’s Emotion (E) are not the same thing. Likewise, Socionics Se does not correspond directly to PY’s Volition (V).

Additionally, Afanasyev typed Maxim Gorky as 1E, while in Socionics, Maxim Gorky is generally regarded as the archetypal LSI. Since Afanasyev explicitly distinguished Socionics from PY, I assume he was at least familiar with Socionics. Yet despite that, he still typed an LSI as 1E.

Doesn’t this suggest that the correlation between these two systems is actually much weaker than many people assume?

reddit.com
u/kappacat- — 15 days ago