My first SaaS took 9 months and 4k in ad spent and never made a penny. Here's what my second made in 4 weeks, and everything I learned.

My first SaaS took 9 months and 4k in ad spent and never made a penny. Here's what my second made in 4 weeks, and everything I learned.

I have been building software on my own for a while, and I want to write down everything that happened between my first real product and my second one, because the gap between them taught me more than anything I have ever read or watched, and I honestly wish someone had sat me down and shown me all of this before I started throwing money at things.

The first one: nine months, £4k, zero payers

The first one was called Ancestorii, a private place for families to keep their memories, photos and stories together. I spent about six months building it with ChatGPT writing most of the code, and by launch day I genuinely believed it was perfect, I thought people would find it and love it the way I did, and what actually happened is nobody came. So I did what I think most of us do and started buying attention. Meta ads, Google search and YouTube ads, Reddit ads, UGC videos from creators, a £70 podcast sponsorship, a £120 post on a family tree magazine's Facebook page, my own podcast on Spotify, SEO pages, and cold messages to genealogy creators where not one of them replied. I even printed physical memory books before a single stranger had uploaded a single memory, which looking back was probably the most expensive mistake in the whole thing.

Some of the numbers are almost funny now. £210 on Meta in seven days brought around 15,000 visits and not one payer. When I took the paywall away the first signup came after £2.80 of spend, and then I sat at about four signups a day on £4 a day of Meta until I had 125 signups and zero people paying. Today it has 177 signups and has never had a paying customer. The worst part is I noticed in the very first week that the signups weren't turning into anything, and I kept spending anyway, on hope, because nobody told me to stop and I didn't want to be the one to say it.

The diagnosis took me far too long to accept. It was a vitamin, not a painkiller. Nice to have, nobody needs it today, nobody loses anything if they never sign up, and no amount of ads fixes that, ads just buy you the bad news faster.

The second one: £25 on ads, and people pay

Prep66 is an exam prep site for the Part 66 licence exams, 13 modules, about 25,000 practice questions with explanations, revision guides, mock exams, the lot. I launched it in the middle of August with one Reddit post in the community where those students hang out, and the first person paid full price nine days later without a discount code.

The only money I've ever put into ads was about £25 on a Reddit campaign, and it brought one signup and zero payers, so I killed it after five days and everything since has been organic. These are the last four weeks straight off the Stripe dashboard: monthly recurring revenue went from about £51 to £171, active subscribers went from 3 to 11, £230 came in gross, zero failed payments, zero refunds. It's not life changing money and I'm not pretending it is, it's less than two days of my shift pay, but the line only goes one way and it's doing that with no ad budget at all, while my first product burned £4k and never moved once.

So what was actually different? I ran both products back through the same questions afterwards and ended up with six things a product needs before a stranger will pay for it. Prep66 has all six. Ancestorii failed five of them.

The six things a product needs before anyone pays

One, the problem has to be mandatory. Nobody has to save their family stories. Someone sitting a licence exam has to pass it, there's no version of their career where they skip it.

Two, there has to be a deadline. An exam has a date, and a date makes people act this week instead of someday. Ancestorii had no clock on it at all, which is exactly why "I'll do it later" killed nearly every signup.

Three, failing has to cost something real. Fail an exam and you lose money and months, sometimes a pay rise. Not using a memory app costs you nothing today, even if it might cost you something in twenty years.

Four, the alternatives have to be expensive or bad. The other ways to prepare are long paid courses, thick textbooks, or older question banks that look like nobody has touched them in years. When the alternatives are pricey or tired, something cleaner and cheaper sells itself.

Five, it has to look credible the second someone lands. A student can tell in about ten seconds whether a prep site was made by someone who actually knows the exam, from the module names, the paper formats, the way the questions are written. Ancestorii was asking strangers to trust a no name site with their family photos, which is the exact opposite.

Six, you have to be able to find the buyers. Exam students hang out in a couple of subreddits and they search Google for the exact module they're stuck on. Who's the buyer for a family memory app? Everyone and no one, which in practice means you pay Meta to guess for you.

How I picked it and checked it before writing any code

The market research for Prep66 wasn't fancy at all. I picked a world I already knew inside out, so I knew what students complain about and what they already pay for, and then I checked four things. People already pay for this today, not "would pay", actually pay, right now, to someone. The options they're paying for are old and dated. Building it used to be really expensive, because it's a mountain of content, and with AI it isn't anymore. And it's too small for a big company to bother with but big enough to pay one person properly. If all four aren't true, I don't touch it now.

Then the validation was the launch itself. I built it lean, put it in front of one subreddit and watched whether strangers paid, and they did inside nine days. With Ancestorii I had the same kind of signal in week one, it just said no, and I ignored it for months.

What actually brought people in: SEO and GEO

Before anything else I put tracking on every signup, so every new account gets stamped with where it came from, either the UTM tags on the link or the site that sent them. That one decision changed how I saw everything, because of the first 13 tracked signups, 6 came from ChatGPT citing the site, 5 came from Google, 1 came direct and 1 came from the £25 ad. Gemini started showing up as a source not long after. I genuinely did not expect AI answers to be my biggest channel, and I'd never have known without the tracking.

What I learned doing it is that you write your titles and headings in the exact words people type, not the words you would use yourself. AI tools quote facts, not vibes, so the pages that got picked up were the boring factual ones: a glossary, a facts and figures page, a page comparing the ways you can study for the exam that doesn't trash anyone by name, and a features page with the prices pulled live so they're never out of date. ChatGPT leans on Bing, so I submitted the sitemap to Bing Webmaster Tools and set up IndexNow so Bing gets pinged every time a public page changes, and the robots file lets the AI crawlers in instead of blocking them.

By late September Google Search Console showed 194 clicks and 6,110 impressions with an average position of 8.5, and about 1,580 of those impressions came from Google's own AI answers. It's not all solved either, Gemini still barely knows we exist, and that's my whole job for October.

Reddit posts written like a normal person talking, plus SEO and GEO, did basically everything.

Where all of this went: AskSami

Once Prep66 started paying I kept thinking about how much of that Ancestorii money I would have kept if someone had looked at what I'd built in week one and told me straight that it was a vitamin and to stop buying ads. Every time I looked at my ad numbers they meant nothing to me, so I'd paste them into ChatGPT or Claude and get the same generic "have you tried different hooks" answers, because they didn't know my product, they didn't know what I'd already tried, and they forgot all of it the next chat.

So I built AskSami. Sami reads your code from your GitHub repo, read only, so it already knows what you've built without you having to explain it, and then it tells you honestly whether you've built a painkiller or a vitamin, who's already selling the same thing, what your edge is if you actually have one, and where your effort and money should go, free channels before paid ones. It ties your signups and payments back to the exact post, page or ad that brought them, which is the tracking lesson from Prep66 done for you, and it remembers everything you've tried so you're never starting from zero again.

You can talk to Sami at asksami.app without even signing up.

If you're sitting where I sat with Ancestorii, with signups coming in and nobody paying, I know exactly how that feels, and I hope something in here saves you a few months and a bit of money. If you want to connect, swap notes or just chat about what you're building, please do, my DMs are always open 🙂

u/keepingmemories — 11 days ago

UK mechanic who's been reading the FAA handbooks for months, is the gap between how you lot are trained and how we are actually as big as everyone makes out?

So I'm a mechanic in the UK, did our licence exams over here, and for the last few months I've been going through the FAA handbooks properly, partly out of curiosity about how the US side does it and partly because I've been building something off the back of them, and honestly the thing that's surprised me most isn't the content, it's how differently the two systems go about teaching the same job.

Over here it's split into a load of separate modules, maths and physics and legislation and human factors all sat on their own, and it's very theory heavy, you can be years in before you're signing anything off. The FAA material reads a lot more hands on, here's the system, here's how it works, here's how you inspect it, and the whole thing seems built to get you competent and on the floor a lot quicker. Both sides seem to look down on the other a bit, you get the EASA guys saying the US ticket is easy and the US guys saying the EASA guys can recite a regulation but can't turn a wrench, and I've got no idea from the outside how much of that is real and how much is just the usual.

So for anyone who's worked both sides, or worked with EASA licensed guys in a US hangar or the other way round, is the difference actually there on the floor six months in, and if you could pinch one thing from the other system what would it be, because from reading the handbooks I can see the argument both ways and I'm genuinely not sure which one produces the better mechanic.

reddit.com
u/keepingmemories — 2 months ago

Built a Part 66 prep site a week ago and you lot asked for an A&P version. So I made one. 25 free Pro accounts for honest feedback (US FAA only this time)

So a week ago I posted here about Prep66, a Part 66 exam prep site I built for the UK and EASA crowd. A few of you replied saying it would be nice if someone did the same for the FAA side. The handbooks are all online and free anyway, so I thought why not build one for my fellow aircraft mechanics in the US.

It's called PrepAMT Academy. It covers the three A&P writtens, General, Airframe and Powerplant, all built from the actual FAA handbooks rather than some question bank that hasn't been looked at in years. Same setup as Prep66, same idea. Practice questions, revision material and mocks in the format you'll actually sit.

Same honesty as last time though. It's live and it works, but I built it alone and I know I've got blind spots. I want it battered by people who are actually sitting these exams or have sat them recently, not people like me who did the EASA side.

So the deal is the same as before. First 25 people get free unlimited Pro access. Message me directly with your name and email once you have signed up (signing up is free) and I'll set you up. In return all I want is honest feedback once you've had a proper go. If it's good, tell me. If it's rubbish, definitely tell me, that's the useful part.

Link is in the comments.

reddit.com
u/keepingmemories — 2 months ago

Built a Part 66 exam prep site because the existing options annoyed me. Giving away 25 free Pro accounts for honest feedback (UK/EASA only, sorry US folks)

So a bit of background. I did my BSc in Aircraft Maintenance Engineering and sat these exams like everyone else here. What did my head in was how bad the prep options were. Either stupidly expensive, or question banks that clearly hadn't been touched since 2015, or PDFs someone scanned from a college handout.

It's called Prep66 Academy. It covers the UK CAA and EASA syllabus, so if you're doing FAA A&P stuff this won't be for you. There's over 25,000 questions across 13 modules from M1 through to M17, full study books and revision guides for each one, timed mocks that match the real exam format, and everything is checked against the actual CAA and EUR-Lex documents rather than whatever some forum said in 2012.

Here's the thing though. It's live and it works, but I built it mostly alone and I know I've got blind spots. Before I start properly charging people for it I want it battered by people who are actually sitting these exams right now.

So the deal is simple. DM me, I'll send you the link and set you up with free unlimited Pro access. First 25 people. In return all I want is honest feedback once you've had a proper go with it. If it's good, tell me. If it's rubbish, definitely tell me, that's worth more.

Not trying to sell anything in this post. I just want it torn apart by people who actually know Part 66 before anyone pays a penny for it.

reddit.com
u/keepingmemories — 2 months ago

I rebuilt everything. Still have not made a penny. But it feels different now, something has changed.

Some of you might remember my earlier posts here. The one where I spent £210 on ads and got zero paying customers. The one where I was asking about funding and had nothing but a half built product and a lot of stubbornness.

A lot has changed since then.

The platform has 125 signups now. Still zero paying customers, I am not going to sugar coat it, it is what it is. But the platform is unrecognisable from what it was.

It started when I tried to sign up to my competitors. StoryWorth, Remento, Heirlooms, StoryKeeper, Meminto, Keepsake, My Life in a Book. I could not sign up unless I paid first. I also realised their entire goal was to get you to buy a book. That was it. Buy the book and their business ends there. So I went back to the drawing board and started from scratch. I wanted to build something unique that stood out from the masses. I became focused on overtaking my competitors and changing the whole Memory Preservation business.

Ancestorii was basically a single user tool. One person uploading photos and building timelines alone. That is not how families work. Nobody preserves memories by themselves. So I ripped the backend apart and rebuilt it around families. A family that can invite other members to contribute, thus becoming a shared library with multiple people contributing to the same timelines, albums, voice notes, and capsules. Signups shot up to an average of around 4 a day on just £4 daily meta spend. No other advertising cost.

Then I went physical. But differently to the competitors. They are essentially book printers with a prompt system bolted on. Ancestorii is a living library. The digital side is the foundation. Timelines, albums with voice notes, time capsules. And when you are ready you can turn any of it into something physical. Hardcover memory books. Canvas prints. Acrylics. The physical products come from the library, not the other way around.

I think there is a real gap here. People are tired of social media where everything is performative. Tired of memories scattered across six cloud accounts and three old phones in a drawer. They just want a quiet place where it all lives together and their family can contribute without it being public.

Google's AI Overview started referencing me as the founder which was a strange moment, and i did get a small sense of pride.

I still work full time shifts. I build on my days off. No investors. No co founder. No formal software background. Just stubbornness and an unhealthy number of late nights.

The next bridge is revenue. 125 people signed up and none of them have paid me anything. That is the honest truth. But the product finally feels like something families would actually use together rather than something one person tries alone and forgets about.

If anyone here has crossed that gap from free signups to first paying customer I would genuinely love to hear how. I am all ears..

reddit.com
u/keepingmemories — 5 months ago