
u/kernelangus420

Business adoption of AI agents tripled this year
Quote:
A major transformation is underway as businesses create and scale their agentic workforce. Businesses scaled their agentic workforces from an average of 5 activated agents in February 2025 to 13 by April 2026—growing agent production nearly 3X at a 7% compound monthly growth rate.
Agents are moving from simple tasks to handling autonomous, multi-step workflows. The average number of unique skills that each agent is able to act on rose from an average of 2 at the beginning of 2025 to 6 by the end of the year as seasonal demand grew in industries like Retail and Financial Services. When demand for agents is highest, each agent takes on triple the capability to support businesses.
Not only is the volume of unique skills rising, but agents are increasingly taking on secondary functions. For example, service agents are taking commerce and marketing actions, expanding the versatility of what they can do for customers and businesses. The data shows that employees are growing more confident about which actions they can entrust to agents, and agents are also acting on those tasks when conversations call for it.
The "Action-to-Output" ratio is growing at a 15% Compound Monthly Growth Rate (CMGR). This means agents are triggering external business logic rather than just generating text. This ratio increases during times of seasonal demand.
As employees increasingly hand off complex tasks to AI agents, Salesforce developed a new way to measure that activity: the Agentic Work Unit (AWU). An AWU represents one discrete unit of work completed by an AI agent — a task reasoned through, a decision made, an action taken. As of April 2026, Agentforce agents produced 734M AWUs - increasing by 15% month-over-month. As of April 2026, Agentforce agents’ AWU output is increasing by a 15% CMGR (compound monthly growth rate).
Leveraging agents creates tangible results with customers. Retailers that deployed AI agents during the holiday shopping season saw a 4X higher sales growth rate.
After they deploy AI agents, customer service organizations report that the #1 improved KPI is customer satisfaction — ranking ahead of service rep productivity, average handle time, customer retention, and first-response time.
77% of shoppers that engaged with on site branded shopper agents feel more confident with their purchase.
74% of shoppers trust the recommendations they receive from AI agents/agentic search.
Historical Images - Hong Kong Subway May 1991
youtube.comNative Apps Should Be Avoided Whenever Possible
nooneshappy.com"Dark Hours" an app by Godier that was created with Claude AI had much resemblance to existing open source app, also incidentally called Dark Hours, and even contained the same bug as the open source version that was later fixed. Godier later removed his app after talking with the open source owner.
Godier's apology:
https://blog.terrygodier.com/2026/08/09/mea-culpa-dark-hours.html
The place where the open source owner (Beher) first brought up his version of Dark Hours and how they both had the same bug:
https://bsky.app/profile/terrygodier.com/post/3ms2lm4kcfc2j
This story trended on Hacker News:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49214863
Both Godier and Beher used Claude to build their apps and both apps had the same bug (but Beher had fixed his.)
Do you write unit tests for UI stuff?
Writing unit tests for business logic is understandable as you are really just testing the logic which was written from scratch.
Also writing unit tests for self-contained custom UI components like a custom data table is also understandable as all custom stuff is usually buggy and all the inputs/outputs for self-contained stuff is easy to mock.
But how about the overall UI stuff?
I hear people writing units tests for:
- To test that the components in a third party library behave as intended: e.g. that a Button component actually displays the label that as passed in a clicking it calls the callback
- To test for the existence of a login button on the login page
- To test for the existence of all buttons/links in all pages of an app
- To test that entering credentials in a login page will login the user
What other types of UI tests do you write?
New Chinese wealth tax specifically targets tax havens and legal trusts to make hiding wealth in foreign tax havens more expensive than keeping it in the country.
China's super-rich 'in shock' and hunting for cash as Beijing issues surprise tax on offshore trusts
For decades, the legal structure has been a favored vehicle of Chinese tycoons to hold everything from pre-IPO stakes to family fortunes — and their tax treatment in China was never spelled out. But on July 24, China’s Ministry of Finance and tax authority issued the clearest rules yet on how they should be taxed.
Now a 20% levy will be collected at nearly every stage of a trust’s life, from establishment to profit distribution and termination. Families need to declare and pay outstanding amounts on assets transferred into such trusts since the start of 2023 by Oct. 22 — a total window of 90 days. Late declarations or non-payments could incur surcharges.
That countdown has set off a scramble across Hong Kong and Singapore, popular destinations for China-linked families to set up trust structures.
“Many clients, trustees, and advisors are still in shock,” said Clifford Ng, a Hong Kong-based partner at Zhong Lun law firm.
Assets held under trusts in Hong Kong alone reached HK$5.2 trillion ($667 billion) in 2023, with 55% of the underlying investments located in mainland China and Hong Kong, according to a report by KPMG and the Hong Kong Trustees’ Association, which called the mainland the industry’s most significant growth driver.
Singapore, along with the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands, has been favored as another legal hub for Chinese high-net-worth families to hold offshore assets. KPMG found some clients see less political risk in the city-state than in Hong Kong, according to a report released in 2025.
Sin Tat Plaza hits a new all-time low! The 5637th transaction was completed today, with a registered transaction value of HK$300,000. The original owner purchased the property in 2010 for approximately HK$700,000, holding it for 16 years and realizing a loss of HK$400,000, representing a 57% drop.
youtube.comPulmonologist illustrates why how Artificial Intellegence is about to take over his job
"You're not invited to fly on JetBlue again"- Why did they use "invited" when they didn't invite her in the first place?
The title was obtained from this news article:
>"All the stress and anxiety that had built up over the years boiled over and I lost it," she admitted. "I was saying a lot of not nice things and threatened that a lawsuit was heading JetBlue's way. Then I hung up."
The next morning, Lisa unexpectedly received a phone call from JetBlue's corporate offices. Now she was getting somewhere, she thought. Lisa assumed the outreach was meant to be an olive branch from the airline to its unsatisfied customer.
She could not have been more wrong.
JetBlue: 'You're not invited to fly on JetBlue again'
The JetBlue executive was not about to apologize or attempt to appease Lisa. He was calling to deliver a stern message to her. Because of her ongoing aggressive complaints and rude behavior toward the carrier's phone agents, JetBlue had permanently canceled her trip and was refunding the $14,000.
The person in the article initiated the flight booking with JetBlue so it wasn't that JetBlue invited her to use the service.
When JetBlue banned her, why did they use "not invited" instead of "not allowed" or "not permitted"?
It seems extra confusing and maybe cause her to think that the whole flight was actually complimentary rather than paid out of her own pocket.
I tricked an AI scam bot into losing its mind
What does "soup de natz" mean from this video?
It's from this video and starts at the 57 minute mark:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=2966&v=ZqGSg4b_cZA
The whole sentence was, "8 was the first version that was done soup de natz under Oracle's leadership."
I googled "soup de natz" and only got a reference to Seinfeld and the Soup Nazi.
Morality of stealing from a weird insurance scammer?
Pundit Run
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
Glance Eye Strong
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
Apple Intelligence's new bubble will blend into Dynamic Island, but how will the notch iPhone be supported (e.g. iPhone 17e)?
Is it common to have any async processes finish in the background while the main function returns a value early or should one avoid it strictly and stick with job queues?
How strictly should I avoid a Node/Express handler returning a value to the client, but have some process continue in the background to finish processing it?
If the background is expected to take another 1~2 seconds is it acceptable?
Or should I avoid them and relegate all background tasks, big or small, to a dedicated job queue at the cost of complexity.