Copilot vs Anthropic Claude Console
Hello,
just a sanity check.
I have been using GH Copilot for mainly:
- consultation chat in IT and general
- IT troubleshooting
- maintaining documentation (currently homelab, but company planned)
- writing automation scripts (ansible, powershell)
- maintaining IaC
No real programming/coding, no inline. I don't write the scripts, AI does, I understand them and use them. Most changes are done via prompting. I need a relatively large context for AI to be able to hold my git repo in the context, when for instance doing a documentation check over everything (doing this every now and then).
For how I understand it, I have pure token usage.
Copilot was great until now. From 1. June, I believe the pricing is going to be the same as Anthropic Claude Console, with two distinct advantages with Claude Console:
- with Claude Console, I pay per usage (and that can quickly leverage towards positive, as there are months where I use AI very little, like vacation months or just not doing much)
- larger context window, I believe Claude has the ability to context my whole repo, while Copilot does not
Why I am asking: I find the Copilot usage, especially when it comes to corrections, way user friendlier. While both Cline + Anthropic and Copilot fullfill this, Cline actually does it one step at a time, which takes a long time if there are many corrections, while the Copilot does it much quicker. Not sure whether that is a quality feature, but it makes corrections by "OK"-ing way simpler.
So, what is your take on this?
Thanks