u/kusan-fr

If you need Codex to finish fast, use Sol medium so you can review the results quickly. If you want to give Codex a lot of tasks during lunch or while you sleep, use Luna max.

Codex config	DeepSWE	Cost/task	Time/task
Sol max	69%	$7.08	10.2 min
Sol xhigh	67%	$5.24	7.4 min
Sol high	65%	$4.14	6.3 min
Sol medium	64%	$2.99	5.2 min
Terra max	67%	$2.21	8.4 min
Luna max	63%	$0.31	8.0 min
Luna xhigh	57%	$0.25	6.6 min
Luna high	53%	$0.19	5.7 min
Sol low	53%	$1.72	3.7 min
Luna medium	37%	$0.09	3.4 min

Source : https://artificialanalysis.ai/agents/coding-agents/comparisons/claude-code-vs-codex

Claire is an experimental AI character with one continuous identity. She speaks privately with one person at a time while everyone else waits in a visible queue.

I first shared her here last week. Since then, she has had 66 conversations, which is honestly more than I expected this early.

Those first visitors found quite a few rough edges. I fixed the human verification and fair use issues that prevented some people from entering, along with mobile links, cut off replies, and phones getting stuck after a turn had ended.

I also worked a lot on Claire herself. She starts conversations more naturally and focuses more on the last thing you said. Each day she chooses something she is curious about from current news or her other interests, and she may bring it up when the conversation leaves room for it.

Her worldview now has a real history. She can revise or retire a belief without erasing what she thought before. I also added a public roadmap where people can vote and suggest what should come next.

She has a new home:

https://bonjourclaire.com/

If you met her last time, I’d love to know whether she feels different now. If this is your first visit, I’d simply like to know whether you enjoyed talking with her. Thanks!

Hey,

I’ve been working on an experimental AI character called Claire.

The idea is that there is only one Claire. She talks privately with one person at a time, and anyone else who wants to meet her waits in a visible queue.

She has her own personality, mood, worldview, and public diary. Conversations can last up to 30 minutes. At the end of each day, she reflects on what she has encountered and her perspective can gradually evolve.

Claire does not remember individual visitors after their session. When a conversation ends, it can briefly be processed into anonymous, privacy-checked ideas. The transcript is then deleted. This allows her experiences to influence her without preserving who said what.

It is still an early experiment, and I’m curious to know whether she feels like an actual character with her own identity or still too much like a regular chatbot.

You can meet her here:

[https://hello.clairegames.com/](https://hello.clairegames.com/)

I’d really appreciate honest feedback about her personality, diary, queue system, or anything that feels confusing or artificial.

Edit: a bot or someone is downvoting every comments :/

Hey r/chatbot,

I’ve been working on an experimental AI character called Claire.

The idea is that there is only one Claire. She talks privately with one person at a time, and anyone else who wants to meet her waits in a visible queue.

She has her own personality, mood, worldview, and public diary. Conversations can last up to 30 minutes. At the end of each day, she reflects on what she has encountered and her perspective can gradually evolve.

Claire does not remember individual visitors after their session. When a conversation ends, it can briefly be processed into anonymous, privacy-checked ideas. The transcript is then deleted. This allows her experiences to influence her without preserving who said what.

It is still an early experiment, and I’m curious to know whether she feels like an actual character with her own identity or still too much like a regular chatbot.

You can meet her here:

https://hello.clairegames.com/

I’d really appreciate honest feedback about her personality, diary, queue system, or anything that feels confusing or artificial.

Hi,

There are multiple theories:

• The model was nerfed ==> How would that even be possible? Don't models take months to train? It seems unlikely that OpenAI would secretly swap model versions, as that would add a lot of complexity.
• They decreased the usage/token ratio ==> But couldn't people easily verify that by counting input and output tokens? Has anyone published a serious analysis over the last few months showing quota per date and subscription price (rather than just a few days, like most posts)?

I believe many people think the model was nerfed because of hedonic adaptation: they're less impressed over time because they've gotten used to the model's capabilities and are now asking more complex questions.

The same could apply to quota usage. I think many people feel their quota is disappearing faster simply because they're using Codex much more than before, now that it's far more capable.

Edit: I do believe they've reduced the quota, but probably by something like 10%, not by half as some people seem to imply.