u/larvalampee

Could a video about Peter Thiel be good?

I feel like he’s ripe for content with his philosophy about immortality that seems vampiric and goes against the god he believes in and just seems to say things that are blasphemy, and he wants christo fascism while being a gay immigrant who’s married and has kids with a man (I guess for him, he’s rich enough to bipass the shitty things he wants to inflict on others). He seems to also back a lot of the annoying and harmful stuff in our life today that Natalie’s made videos about. He’s backed JD Vance and Trump. But also niches like he’s backing Clavicular and The Red Scare podcast who just seem to create an ecosystem that’s like 4chan for women, I’ve heard Brihana Joy Grey took money from him

reddit.com
u/larvalampee — 2 days ago
▲ 9 r/antiai

Found this leftist pro AI sub that seems to not interact with the real world where money impacts buying time to make art, so having patrons to do art helps. And the top comment on a post about IP being a capitalist construct (they’re not wrong) went well Sam Altman said… (he’s a billionaire!!)

reddit.com
u/larvalampee — 2 days ago
▲ 170 r/bisexual

Us bi people can date each other

Ngl I’m not sure how I feel about how les4les is talked about. People can respect others while not wanting to date them. Lesbians can have their reasons like they get each other more and to be honest I feel like a bi partner would get me more. I think even if the reasons are biphobic, then it just means it’s probably for the best to not pursue a relationship with them as it doesn’t seem like healthy grounds for a relationship

reddit.com
u/larvalampee — 11 days ago
▲ 117 r/bisexual

Came across this hot take about how bi women saying they have boyfriends in part cos there’s more men as options is ‘bullshit’ and it’s apparently really because bi women just wanna fit in heteronormativity etc, etc and it’s making me kinda uncomfortable ngl

It just seems unable to just believe someone’s perspective and seems kinda invasive and placing this kinda problematisation on someone’s sex and romantic life. It’s placing a lot of importance on the man the woman is with. Now I’m worried posting this could be construed as I only think lesbians do this and all lesbians do this, I don’t think that. Came across febfem women saying this kinda stuff, Kaleb Heron and Britney Broski who giggled along are not lesbians

I think there can be for some, especially if they are more attracted to women like I think this maybe the case with me, potential compulsory heterosexuality going on and following societal pressures of course. But idk. Maybe two things can be true at once

Think there can be a moralisation of people’s relationships and mismanagement surrounding rejection that can be quite incel like even if it’s got a veneer of being progressive. I don’t think it is unique to one group, I think when some ppl moralise about the les4les preference - saying it’s biphobic (this isn’t talking about ppl who are dicks about bi women they reject cos that’s not about preferences), that’s another form of it

reddit.com
u/larvalampee — 12 days ago

I’m over thinking the take your Zorlof and vote for neoliberalism so things don’t get any worse tweet lol

It seems like people who go very left or very right are against the medications I’ve mentioned. Right wing people chalk up needing to take these medications as a sign of a lack of willpower or weakness. It’s also tied in RFK Jr’s vision that’s low-key pro eugenics that’s pretty terrifying ngl. There’s also conspiracies surrounding these meds similar to anti vax stuff - this is maybe also belonging to some left wing ppl as well though. Left and right wing people will say ‘there was an opioid crisis so naturally ozempic’s popularity (in part cos a lot of people have diabetes) is going to lead to bad things’.

(Edit: a subset, it’s not everyone but I have seen ppl wrap anti medication views around a leftist or vaguely left wing frame work) Left wing people will say these medications are just bandaid for a bullet hole of our society that makes us depressed and/or diabetic. I kinda get irritated cos I know they’re not gonna get rid of every food desert and unionise every shitty job and create luxury space communism while I’m currently taking anti depressants when they say this feel good thing about how there will be no depression when we get rid of every bad thing. I have autism and while there needs to be societal reforms to make it easier, idk it does just make me predisposed to anxiety about things like change and deadlines and holding a conversation with people, especially if they’re new, that will exist in a socialist utopia. When I was a kid, I was terrified of a particular light bulb shape. Idk if maybe it’s when mental health things seem so out there that people don’t even know how it can occur. I’ve heard that there are people with ADHD who are quite debilitated by it, but I can’t speak for that too much

There’s then body positive arguments about Ozempic. I admittedly probably don’t know enough about it as I’m a US size 4. I know there can be predatory marketing that I’m against and some wrapping around diet culture. But people also seem to attribute celebrities who might be on drugs, anorexic which existed before Ozempic, or chronically ill and stuff on GLP-1s. It can seem like people forget ppl with type 2 diabetes exist though. The Financial Diet seemed to make a nuanced video about it

Then see anti body positivity people like Jillian Michaels and other personal trainers be against it, maybe out of worrying about business or it going against their no pain no gain ethos

u/larvalampee — 18 days ago