u/maplenew60

Excerpt from the Judgement

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(C) requires for “non-retained” experts, such as Plaintiff’s percipient doctor witnesses, disclosures that state:

(i) the subject matter on which the witness is expected to present evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, 703, or 705; and

(ii) a summary of the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify.”

This disclosure must be made “at least 90 days before the date set for trial”—in this case, April 15, 2026. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D)(i). Although Plaintiff indicated in his discovery plan an intention that his percipient witness would offer expert testimony, Plaintiff never served Defendant a disclosure containing the facts and opinions about which the witnesses would testify.

Certainly, the short descriptions contained in Plaintiff’s initial disclosures cannot constitute the “summary of the facts and opinions” the rule requires. See Exhibit A at 2, ECF No. 129-2.

Rule 37(c)(1) imposes an automatic exclusion sanction for undisclosed expert testimony where a noncompliant party has not shown that the failure to disclose was either substantially justified or harmless

Glad to know that Frank takes surgery advice from a random emails and a bunch of random strangers on looksmaxxing forums.

Frank's mustn't have researched very hard during those 2 years because a simple Google search will tell you that orbital decompression is not a cosmetic surgery. I don't know if Taban or Frank was the one who insisted on the surgery but anyone with brain knows any surgery around the eyes is extremely risky

I bet you all the 'research' Frank did was look at some looksmaxxing forums instead of any medical journal articles etc. If Frank wanted to truly looksmax, he should just get limb lengthening

I was able to find this case after asking Chatgpt and this video proves Frank understands nothing about the law or how the court system works (I do preface that Chagpt may not be accurate and the below might all be a hallucination) . Even if his lawsuits have legitimate claims, the fact he doesn't hire a lawyer to follow proper legal and court processes is causing all his cases to be dismissed

I'm not a US lawyer but wanted to express some points I found interesting after briefly reading the case. We know Frank follows this sub reddit so who knows, maybe he learns something.

1. Frank repeatedly brings up his amendment right that he is entitled to a jury trial regardless of literally anything that happens or any issues with his filings or legal claims. In his mind, the moment he files a lawsuit, he is entitled to a jury trial.

Frank stated that “any rulings in this action should not be considered before evidence is presented to a jury.” The judge responded - A jury decides the facts, not the law. To get to a jury, a plaintiff must first present cognizable, plausible legal claims.

This makes perfect sense in the mind of any sane person. The Court must first determine whether a case is legally viable before it proceeds to trial. You can't just file a bogus lawsuit against someone and expect to drag people in for a jury trial. In this case, all defendants motions to dismiss were granted.

Inherently, Frank seems to misinterpret the amendment rights in the USA. For example, Frank claims its his freedom of speech to slander Saladino and call him a child abuser. It's fine as long as it's true in Frank's mind. This has never been correct and who knows where Frank got the idea he can say literally anything about anyone with no repercussions.

2. Frank frequently files lawsuits in the Pennsylvania jurisdiction (who knows, maybe this court recognises that Frank is poor and waived his filing fees) regardless if it's the right forum to bring forward the particular lawsuit. For example, he sued Taban in Pennsylvania even thought California was the proper forum.

Frank argued that the overall business transaction had connections to Pennsylvania and that Pennsylvania was the final destination of the product. Whether or not each individual business involved is incorporated and operates in the specific state of final destination is completely unreasonable. Mind you, this is just Frank ranting and not rooted in any law.

The defendants argued lack of jurisdiction, namely: they did not engage in any activity in or directed to Pennsylvania with respect to the shipment of beef.

They are not registered to do business in Pennsylvania, does not have any employees in Pennsylvania, and does not maintain an office in Pennsylvania. This was proved by affidavit evidence from each defendant.

The Judge advised Frank a reasonableness argument alone is insufficient to defeat the defendants motion. The burden of demonstrating the facts that establish personal jurisdiction falls on the plaintiff, and once a defendant has raised a jurisdictional defense, the plaintiff must prove by affidavits or other competent evidence that jurisdiction is proper. Frank need only establish a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction and is entitled to have his allegations taken as true and all factual disputes drawn in his favor.

Thats all Frank needed to do. Affidavit evidence that proves, on the face of the case, that personal jurisdiction is proper. Frank couldn't even be bothered to do that. He just kept ranting about the location of his business.

Sorry for the long post, just my thoughts and hopefully Frank reads this and actually hiress a lawyer.

I guess this is the 6 hour window where Frank is magically healed and he doesn't suffer from any sort of visual impairment, blindness or chronic migraines and is able to drive safely like everyone else

He must be watching this sub reddit. Right after I ask for an update, he posts an update on tiktok.

1. One thing I find interesting - Frank self admits that he has no evidence in the trial against Taban. Frank has filed this lawsuit for at least 1 year and he has no evidence or anything that he can stand on the actual trial.

This is strange because Frank initially kept making videos about how Taban lied to him about the risks of the surgery from the consultation period to the post surgery recovery period. Weird, that Frank didn't even try secretly recording Taban so he has something to stand on in court.

Frank also made claims that he personally liaised with former patients that were botched by Taban and had enough evidence to start a class action lawsuit. But now he has nothing and needs to delay this case for a year?

Frank literally made a 30min video responding to Tabans cease and desist and claimed everything he said was backed by facts and evidence. Shouldn't it be easy for Frank to provide all of this in court?

2. Another interesting point is Frank's lawsuit rests entirely on records produced in response to a subpeona. I'm assuming he means confidential patient records and Google's records for deleting reviews.

This is an even stranger claim because those patient records wouldn't even be made public. So how did those records impact Frank's decision to get the surgery at the start?

Not to mention there are privacy and confidential privilege issues involved with doctor-patient records. Taban isn't going to hand all his patient records to Frank simply because a subpeona was issued (I'm assuming Taban has lawyers to advise him on that and he's pro se like Frank).

3. Probably not a good idea to post this video for Taban's lawyers to see. They now know the plaintiff has absolutely nothing so I don't see any reason for them to agree with a court hearing listed for next year. Just progress to court in 2 weeks and Frank will automatically lose.

I also don't think handing out flyers is scaring Taban too much so there goes Frank's hidden trap card.

Just some thoughts after seeing Frank act like he had some sort of bombshell lawsuit against Taban and he was going to get 500 million in damages

We have heard seen Frank whine and whine about Taban botching him and gangstalking him so he can't get any compensation blah blah blah

But does anyone know what's happening in the lawsuit with Taban? I don't follow the lawsuit and only caught updates from this sub or vegan gains live stream where he reacts to court filings.

Last I remember, is Vegan Gains apparently saying Taban requested a jury duty and Frank is doing what ever he can to drag the process

Appreciate any updates

A bunch of scraggly handwriting on a small piece of paper proves that Frank is using the highest quality ingredients possible for his ice cream.

It's actually hilarious that his narcissm prevents him from realising that he is doing exactly what Ice Cream for Bears is doing. His website doesn't list the sourcing of the ingredients, his ice cream is not using USDA certified organic ingredients and his 'invoice' proof is just a fake piece of paper that he just wrote up before recording the video.

Frank doesn't provide any independent testing to prove his ice cream is the 'highest quality and the healthiest' and you're supposed to just believe him.

I don't believe his ice cream is even made by an Amish Farm, it's made in his dirty ass warehouse which doesn't even meet the minimum levels of food safety standards

Let's not forget Frank's ice cream is marked not for human consumption so you can't legally sue him if you get sick.