

British GP - Sprint | Race Pace Analysis: HAM fought hard, but ANT was unbeatable: 0.27s/lap faster than anyone else! Having 3 drivers within 1-tenth (NOR/RUS/LEC) of one another made the Sprint exciting. VER and PIA were far off the top 5...
British GP - Sprint Qualifying | Top Speed & Time at Maximum Throttle
Austrian GP - Qualifying | Mercedes's Deployment Secret? [Made via JMP Software]
Barcelona-Catalunya & Austrian GP - Race | Ferrari's Terrible Tyre Wear
Austrian GP - Race | Race Pace Analysis: VER had the best race pace, by a tiny margin (0.07s). Great comeback after the crash! ANT almost as quick as RUS, McLaren 3rd best car. Ferrari’s extra stop didn’t pay off: HAM was barely quicker than PIA, who pitted twice. Racing Bulls best of the rest.
Austrian GP - Qualifying | Quali Lap Analysis: Mercedes (RUS) got pole by being competitive everywhere. Ferrari was still the slowest on the straights despite the updated engine. Best-in-grid downforce. RBR: Best Top Speed. McL: Lacks aero efficiency (Low top speed, slowest in fastest corner).
Austrian GP - P2 | Best Sectors, Track Dominance & Top Speed
F1 All-Time Official Top Speed Record To Fall in 2026? [Made via JMP Software; Idea by: @yelistener]
Barcelona-Catalunya GP - Qualifying | Aero Performance & Quali Gaps 2025 vs 2026
Key Qualifying Stats | Quali Averages 2025 vs 2026
KEY F1 QUALI STATS (Averages - 2025 vs 2026)
- 2025: McL >> RBR > Mercedes > Ferrari >> Williams;
- 2026: Mercedes >> Ferrari > McL > RBR >> Alpine.
- Mercedes got ALL poles (so far) in 2026; McL's 'just' 13 out of 24 in 2025.
- New regulations → Much larger field spread.
Average gap to pole more than DOUBLED: from 0.86% of laptime (~0.7s) to 1.79% (~1.5s).
|
Barcelona-Catalunya GP - Race | Tpp Speed per Lap: New Season Record!
Barcelona-Catalunya GP - Race | Race Pace & Tyre Degradation
Pit-equated Race Pace (1 extra pit = 22s lost):
The VSC timing may have gifted HAM the lead, but it was HIS PACE that put him there!
- Ferrari / HAM;
- Mercedes / ANT (first time they're not P1);
- McL / NOR (~ same pace as ANT);
- RBR / VER.
On his extra stint, HAM was six-tenths faster than ANT on average, and still 0.27s/lap quicker even after accounting for the additional stop!
Tyre Degradation:
The Hard was the tyre to be! The Medium had worse degradation and pace (as the drivers couldn't push as much on it), but still miles better than the Soft.
|
Barcelona-Catalunya GP - Practice 2 | Top Speed, Turn 14 Minimum Speed & Clipping
Barcelona-Catalunya GP - Practice 2 | Top Speed, Turn 14 Minimum Speed & Clipping
McLaren looked great in FP2! Best top speed AND high-speed cornering; RBR worst in both. Either McL is running more downforce and a more powerful PU mode, or their aero efficiency is excellent.
Opposite for RBR: running less downforce and way less power?
Top Speeds:
McL/NOR: 338
Merc/RUS: 337
Ferrari/LEC: 335
RBR/VER: 328
Turn 14 Min Speed:
McL/NOR: 252
Ferrari/LEC: 249
Merc/RUS: 248
RBR/VER: 244
Clipping:
RBR/VER: -22
McL/NOR: -28
Merc/RUS: -29
Ferrari/LEC: -34
|
2026 Car Regulations | New F1 PU Regulations: ~1100hp in 2028!
Monaco GP - Qualifying | Monaco Delivered the First 2026 Quali Laps With NO Clipping! Antonelli's Miami and Monaco Pole Laps Compared. [Made via JMP Software]
2026 Car Regulations | ADUO Figures Revealed & Explanation of How ADUO is Evaluated [Technical Discussion]
ADUO FIGURES REVEALED
Not only is the Mercedes ICE NOT the most powerful; they're over 2% behind RBPT (a 12-24 hp deficit), so they will benefit from ADUO!
Ferrari (and Audi) DID fall in the 4-6% deficit range → can catch up.
Honda is so far behind it landed in the newly added 6-8% range, unlocking more budget and development time.
No one expected that about Mercedes. Ferrari can finally develop their engine... but so can Mercedes! A huge blow to Ferrari's championship hopes.
---------------
I often read 'The ADUO only considers the ICE power, not the ERS; Mercedes has the best ERS; that's why they got the 2-% ADUO' - but that's wrong!
Read on to understand why ...
The ERS does NOT produce energy: it simply deploys what it previously harvested. ALL energy originates from the ICE.
Harvesting happens:
- At partial throttle, when the ICE produces MORE energy than can be put down (the ERS harvests the surplus).
- When coasting or braking, using the car's kinetic energy.
Having a more powerful ICE:
- Extends the partial throttle phase → more harvesting;
- Raises top speed → more kinetic energy → more harvesting.
Maximum power (tractive and harvesting) is fixed by the rules, and electric motor efficiency is already extremely high (90-95%), so even halving the losses yields only marginal gains.
Conclusion:
The most powerful ICE means the strongest ERS too, unless a team gets its harvesting/deployment strategy completely wrong!
ADUO is evaluated using an "ICE Performance Index", calculated from the ICE's average power and the lap time's sensitivity to power.
The exact formula is kept confidential to prevent manufacturers from gaming the system.
---------------
Article on the topic:
ADUO F1 engine upgrades decision revealed
---------------
Related post:
How ICE power was estimated:
- All 2026 Quali, Sprint & Race sessions;
- Laps with glitchy telemetry excluded;
- Straight-mode instants only: throttle >99%, no braking;
- Same drag area (CdA) assumed for all cars;
- ERS deployment profile estimated, then subtracted to isolate ICE power.
|