u/murithifelix

I want to find more of these, writing code is already hard enough, dev libraries could go a wrong way especially those written for our local tech products

Not sure why he played this system, but City really struggled when he used a single midfielder which should seem obvious to such an experienced coach.

Edit: He played 4132 a few months a go

https://preview.redd.it/eed6ll5cfa1h1.png?width=1835&format=png&auto=webp&s=7cc303a13540952e2f8035ac52a65700e012c284

A very balanced squad, no team in the world cup would match their energy, dropped mane because that Front 3 is really good. Although he could play striker . screenshot from fut gg

https://preview.redd.it/fbnem7gkea1h1.png?width=1835&format=png&auto=webp&s=acd8daba1d6ad159d809b438c1f51eaa9d9af66b

A very balanced squad, no team in the world cup would match their energy, screenshot from fut gg

https://preview.redd.it/d7c6ky4ft91h1.png?width=1835&format=png&auto=webp&s=cd8c97e370ca7b1ac49d7d251beb1cbfb751e3f5

A very balanced squad, no team in the world cup would match their energy, screenshot from fut gg

https://preview.redd.it/b41077bq391h1.png?width=1835&format=png&auto=webp&s=29d46b1bf6b7982730eb483f85bfa7d08a131e35

https://preview.redd.it/g3s62lbux81h1.png?width=1835&format=png&auto=webp&s=6971987337aedd13b82516d3ccc6410282b9e4e3

its a very good squad, no team would match the athleticism ,its technical balanced in midfield and attack.

Do u care that Liverpool won the league last season, or Inter have just won it.

Football is meant to be an escape, artistry, u get to see the results of years of great coaching and work done

Trophies are just last season's stats, football is meant to be a fun experience.

A team like Atleti would have been a much more better experience for the fans if they did not stick with Simeone for a 12 years +.

I want to watch Dybala cook, not Gasperini shout, we are being robbed of a great experience by these clueless club owners and their endless PR machines.

These managers get a lot of praise but I dont see them matching the hype tactically, as someone who is actually interested in and watches a lot of football.

Gasperini had the best squad in the league at Atalanta for a few seasons and he could not compete for the league, when I watched atalanta I genuinely never understood what made him special about him, it was simple defensive football and alot of shouting. same for a manager like Simeone, there are managers like Bordalas, Allegri, Unai Emery, Marcelino who do a better job without access to the same player depth or quality than him but they dont get the same PR.

Fabregas and Alonso I havent watched them much but I am very critical of their player selections and talent acqustions with the budgets they have had available to them, they also play very simple football in the 4321 and 343. Glasner is another one, mid team, boring to watch but PR like Pep.

Tuchel and Nagelllsman were out of bayern because they staganated the team. However the UK media is still telling us Tuchel is generational.

Managers who have impressed me, Ranieri at Roma, Foncesca at Lille and Lyon, Will Still at Reims, Habib Beye had some positive moments at Rennes, Flick high press, Rossenier at Strasbourg , the experiment usage of players, Changing Morreira from RW to LB, fell off at the end because of too much positional play, Fabio Grosso, Chivu, a bit dynamic although Inter pragmatic usage of defensive wingbacks, two traditional 9s is letting them down, Pep dynamism over the years, early Arteta, Klopp, current Nantes coach. Haise at Rennes. These managers especially the non mainstreams ones do not have as much PR.

Is football simply dominated by easy talking points or I am missing something? From Amorin, Thomas Frank, Tudor, RDZ managers seem to get moves without a critical analysis of what tactics and management skills they have. Are club owners and directors simply not interested in football?

Also comment the managers who have impressed u from other leagues, I hear Turan and Farioli are pretty good.

Football is primarly boring because of these bland managers who have stagnated for many years.

These managers get a lot of praise but I dont see them mathing the hype tactically, as someone who is actually interested in and watches a lot of football.

Gasperini had the best squad in the league at Atalanta for a few seasons and he could not compete for the league, when I watched atalanta I genuinely never understood what made him special about him, it was simple defensive football and alot of shouting. same for a manager like Simeone, there are managers like Bordalas, Allegri, Unai Emery, Marcelino who do a better job without access to the same player depth or quality than him but they dont get the same PR.

Fabregas and Alonso I havent watched much but I avery critical of their player selctions and talent acqustions, they also play very simple football in the 4321 and 343.

A manager like Arteta has tried to explore different playing styles, player selections, he is still not great but I can see why fans are hopeful.

Is football simply dominated by easy talking points or I am missing something?

There is no premier League team that is pysically imposing with like 5 drogbas in one team. That team simply does not exist and has never existed, its a myth. Football at the top level cannot accomodate a number of these players, there has to be balance between pysicality and technique. we have seen Arsenal lose to the much less pysical PSG over 2 legs, PSG only had two tall players one being Marquinhos.

Jorginho played in the league for many years, Ayari plays DM for Brighton, Martnez is playing at CB for United , Hujsen was proclaimed as one of the best CBs and he is barely physical, Bernado Silva players even DM For City, David Silva was star in the league, the Current liverpool squad have a midfield that includes Mac Allister, Szobosslai, Jones, Enzo Fernades barely tackles, Mazraoui is barely physical.

Physical players does not mean that u will be hard to play against, Lukaku and Drogba are not hard to play against than Eto'o because their technique disadvantage makes them easier to track. Joelinton also a good example of that.

IMO: Football across the top 5 leagues is not appealing, only the UCl has decent football. And the PL is not any better and the pysicality, intensity argument is a cope especilly when seen PL teams like leeds, Fulham, Everton, Palace, Sunderland, Chelsea, Bournemouth. These are not very good teams to watch.

I do not think that Marseile's squad is better than those two epecilaly the CBs, LB and ST positions. The transfer decisions of the last few years are really now affecting Marseille, Selling Merlin, Rongier and Vaz might have been the craziest decisions. Marseille ignored player development which explains why Rowe,Wahi, Vaz, Luis Suarez were barely given a chance. Coaches who wanted to get rid of good players and bringing in pavard, Hojberg and Auba. My question is who has been making all these decisions ?

Using Git is not coding, terminal is also not coding, so if u were not taught those , there is nothing trivial about those and instuctors probably use tools that are not dependent on them.

I have seen this narrative going around, usually from the same people who use also claim that computer science is supposed to teach u databases, how do u square the two arguments.

U cant learn computer science concepts without applying them because computers run on code not theory.

The Havard CS50 course it teaches u coding basics. Go to a website of any university in Australia, UK or US and check on the grading expectations, u must deliver coding projects. These Unis also a few units each sem.

The early electronic computers were coded.

I barely learnt coding in my CS program, but it does not mean it should be that way, ur instructor should to be good at coding na sio ile ya for loops pekee.