whats more absurd? existing or not existing?
is it more strange that we exist at all, or that at the end of it all, we will not exist at all, for all eternity?
is it more strange that we exist at all, or that at the end of it all, we will not exist at all, for all eternity?
but what if im right? or is the idea that i should accept suffering and death as natural processes?
its a wrapper, simple, because i wanted to learn c, its also stupid and im working on making it better, the source code is easy to read.. each file does one thing, you could read the source i even added comments.
it updates, and gives rpm package information, i use it every day, its something i wanted. you can read what it does from the repo : https://github.com/romeo3o7/fnd
lists, numbering, tables... it can't articulate 2 full sentences.. like i can't read, and i need an analogy for everything, it feels like text stimulation, my dumb brain can't handle long paragraphs i need something firing up my brain to read, like a subway surface video in the background.
im genuinely puzzled, but also annoyed because no matter the system prompt i add, or in preferences edit to "less lists, more paragraphs" i get the same format, does anybody enjoy that format?
its a connection i see some make, they reach to the conclusion that because we die, life is meaningless. that included me. i thought if life lasted longer it would give it meaning.
a pill that cures cancer that lasts a day but cures a thousand is more meaningful than one that lasts a thousand years but cures no one.
the assumption is, longer time equals more possible impact, even if that could be true, what matters is the impact/value/goal of something more than how long it lasts.
yes we are gonna die, that doesn't make life meaningless.