u/peachlychee8

I’ve been staring at these two lab oval diamonds for so long that I think I’ve officially lost the ability to be objective, so I would really love some outside opinions from people who know ovals well 😅

Both are:
- Oval brilliant
- 2.59 ct
- E color
- VVS2
- Ideal cut
- EX polish / EX symmetry
- No fluorescence
- CVD

Diamond 1:
- Measurements: 11.02 x 7.88 x 4.77 mm
- Table: 58%
- Depth: 60.5%
- Crown: 13.8%
- Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick
- Ratio: 1.39

Diamond 2:
- Measurements: 10.88 x 7.73 x 4.85 mm
- Table: 59%
- Depth: 62.7%
- Crown: 14.5%
- Girdle: Medium to Thick
- Ratio: 1.41

The setting will be a rose gold marquise band.

I’d really appreciate any thoughts or opinions from people who own ovals, work with diamonds, or just have a good eye for them in general because I’ve reached the point where every time I think I’ve decided, I change my mind again. Thanks so much!

Hi everyone! I’m hoping to get some honest opinions because I’ve officially stared at these two oval lab diamonds for way too long and can no longer be objective.

I’ve seen both in person multiple times and keep going back and forth between them.

Stone 1
- Oval
- 2.59ct
- E
- VVS2
- Ideal
- Excellent polish/symmetry
- 60.5 depth
- 58 table
- 11.02 x 7.88 x 4.77
- L/W ratio 1.40
- Crown height: 13.8%
- No fluorescence
- CVD
- GCAL certified

Stone 2
- Oval
- 2.59ct
- E
- VVS2
- Ideal
- Excellent polish/symmetry
- 62.7 depth
- 59 table
- 10.88 x 7.73 x 4.85
- L/W ratio 1.41
- Crown height: 14.5%
- No fluorescence
- CVD
- GCAL certified

I attached photos of both because I know specs only tell part of the story with ovals.

Would love to know which one you would personally choose and why. Thank you!

Hi everyone! I’m hoping to get some honest opinions because I’ve officially stared at these two oval lab diamonds for way too long and can no longer be objective.

I’ve seen both in person multiple times and keep going back and forth between them.

Stone 1
- Oval
- 2.59ct
- E
- VVS2
- Ideal
- Excellent polish/symmetry
- 60.5 depth
- 58 table
- 11.02 x 7.88 x 4.77
- L/W ratio 1.40
- Crown height: 13.8%
- No fluorescence
- CVD
- GCAL certified

Stone 2
- Oval
- 2.59ct
- E
- VVS2
- Ideal
- Excellent polish/symmetry
- 62.7 depth
- 59 table
- 10.88 x 7.73 x 4.85
- L/W ratio 1.41
- Crown height: 14.5%
- No fluorescence
- CVD
- GCAL certified

I attached photos of both because I know specs only tell part of the story with ovals.

Would love to know which one you would personally choose and why. Thank you!

Hi everyone! I’m hoping to get some honest opinions because I’ve officially stared at these two oval lab diamonds for way too long and can no longer be objective.

I’ve seen both in person multiple times and genuinely keep going back and forth between them.

Stone 1
- Oval
- 2.59ct
- E
- VVS2
- Ideal
- Excellent polish/symmetry
- 60.5 depth
- 58 table
- 11.02 x 7.88 x 4.77
- L/W ratio 1.40
- Crown height: 13.8%
- No fluorescence
- CVD
- GCAL certified

Stone 2
- Oval
- 2.59ct
- E
- VVS2
- Ideal
- Excellent polish/symmetry
- 62.7 depth
- 59 table
- 10.88 x 7.73 x 4.85
- L/W ratio 1.41
- Crown height: 14.5%
- No fluorescence
- CVD
- GCAL certified

I attached photos of both because I know specs only tell part of the story with ovals.

Would love to know which one you would personally choose and why. Thank you!

Hi everyone, I’m torn between two oval lab diamonds and would love some honest feedback from people who own ovals or know them well. I’ve looked at these in person for hours and keep going back and forth.

Stone 1
Oval
2.59ct
E
VVS2
Ideal
Excellent polish/symmetry
60.5 depth
58 table
11.02 x 7.88 x 4.77
L/W ratio 1.40
No fluorescence
CVD
GCAL certified

Stone 2
Oval
2.59ct
E
VVS2
Ideal
Excellent polish/symmetry
62.7 depth
59 table
10.88 x 7.73 x 4.85
L/W ratio 1.41
No fluorescence
CVD
GCAL certified

I’ve attached photos of both because I know specs only tell part of the story with ovals. I would love to know which one you would personally choose. Thank you!