u/ptr727

I just upgraded my Frontier service to 2gig, same price as what I pay now for 1gig.

I use double failover WAN with Frontier fiber (1g/1g) and Spectrum cable (1g/40m), and both WAN's are connecting at 2.5gig wire speed.

That leaves me with two LAN ports available, and one is currently connected to my Ubnt gig POE switch.

Upgrading my switchgear to 10g is not in my budget.

I am wondering if I can utilize the 2gig internet with e.g. a 2 port LAG config from Firewalla LAN to the Ubnt switch? I understand that won't give a single connection 2gig, but it would support multiple connections in aggregate utilizing 2gig.

Is that possible, any other options?

I've recently been trying to get my local agents to collaborate with GH copilot during PR reviews, and it's been pretty frustrating to get reliable results.

I'l start by saying that even after local claude and local copilot (vscode chat) and local codex reviewed the changes and find nothing wrong, when I submit a PR github copilot ALWAYS finds really good stuff that the local agents missed, so GH Copilot is a net positive to my workflow.

I use the gh cli and graph ql and I've instructed agents (agents.md and copilot_instructions.md) to submit, wait for copilot review to start, wait for copilot review to post, address findings by fixing or commenting on why no fix or ask me, and then auto close the comment, then resubmit, and repeat.

One issue I can't figure out is how to get local gh to ask copilot for a re-review, and even if the repo is configured for auto re-review it rarely happens, so I've just trained the agent to tell me to click the re-review button the UI. If I can reliably automate this step it would be a win.

Is there a more standard or extensible way to run this type of local + remote collab that does not rely on just instructions, or a way to run this async without needing local vscode open all the time, and is there a reliable way to get copilot to do a re-review?

Have some ~20 year old Moen vanity and tub faucets, started leaking and handle spinning, valves under the sink look all rusty, got great advice here to contact Moen support, unbelievably Moen sent me free replacement valves and adapters to fit the old handles on the new valves.

Had the plumber over today, he could not get the handles to come off, he says they are "rust welded on", and he will need to cut them off.

So question, do I get a second opinion on removing the old handles, or is it typical that they won't come off?

I'd much rather prefer to not have to buy new handle sets; especially for the jacuzzi tub where the side would need to be cut open to replace the valves, and finding a similar look for discontinued products will need multiple SAF iterations, and cost.

Equipment is Moen #T951BN "Monticello Brushed nickel two-handle low arc roman tub faucet" and #T4570BN "Monticello Brushed nickel two-handle low arc bathroom faucet".