u/pxng1

Went negative KD but still finished the game with the most damage dealt and damage taken by a mile! Even then, the game was so close because my backline gets erased easily. Even if I peeled Kayn away from them, they would be melted by the 4 AP enemies if I didn't get their attention the entire time. The entire game was me trying to stick to the enemy backline while they try to get as far away from me as possible, while Kayn does the same thing lol.

Augments were:

• Pressure cooker
• Heavy hitter
• Slap around
• Big brain
• Shark tempest

Forgot to take a screenshot of the post-match screen unfortunately

https://preview.redd.it/9dje6fmf4ckh1.png?width=1252&format=png&auto=webp&s=3cef5c8edb04d2716f25fc3d174fd3d332a27594

https://preview.redd.it/doqrjnnn6ckh1.png?width=1247&format=png&auto=webp&s=e1c87c63115a724fc988ba4ea49fa745efcef3ff

was planning for my first live race this year and Singapore seemed like the most logical choice from India.

but then I actually sat down to do the budget. flights and hotels for that weekend are already brutal. I've been checking the official site and places like veritickets to see what grandstand seats are actually left, and once I added that to the overall math, the total trip cost is honestly hard to justify.

Bhai, for the veterans here: is Singapore really worth paying this premium for a first live experience, or should I just hold off and aim for a cheaper grand prix?

Call it a skill issue, but almost every time one player on a team gets tooth fairy, it is insta win. It basically makes any champ (that it is actually good on, i.e., burst mages, assassins...) a one shot god. And when champs like fizz or ekko gets it, it makes those annoying champions 10x more annoying. It's probably the single worst augment to play against, at least for me. I'd prefer if it was taken out of the mode because getting killed straight out of fountain isn't really my definition of fun

have a working nifty options setup. now testing the same basic strategy on sensex and crude oil options.

nubra exposes eligible nse, bse and mcx chains through roughly the same structure, so the data side looks surprisingly normalisable.

thinking of one internal instrument object:

• exchange + underlying
• expiry + strike + option type
• ref id + lot/tick size
• price conversion

but after that the abstraction starts leaking.

sensex expiry/liquidity is not nifty. crude has different hours and behaviour. lot sizes, price units, contract discovery and execution assumptions are all exchange-specific.

so should i keep one common model with exchange-specific validators/adapters, or maintain separate nse/bse/mcx implementations from day one?

trying to avoid three copies of the same code. also don’t want a beautiful generic interface that quietly places the wrong contract because some mcx assumption got inherited from nifty.

how are you guys drawing the boundary?

Hard to find one that feels trustworthy long term. Curious what people actually use consistently.