

▲ 1 r/RepTimeQC
GMT II QC -126710GRNR Jub 904L SS/SS Black Dial VSF V3 DD3285
- Dealer name: Modern Times
- Factory name: VSF
- Model name (& version number): GMT II 126710GRNR Jub 904L SS/SS Black Dial VSF V3 DD3285 CHS
- Price Paid: $658
- Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/EsvZzuN
- Index alignment: It looks good from what I can see. I did use the alignment tool and I don't see anything that sticks out.
- Dial Printing: The dial printing looks good.
- Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks alignment looks centered and the print looks good.
- Hand Alignment: Looks good to me.
- Bezel: Not sure if it's aligned at the 24 hour mark
- Solid End Links (SELs): SELs looks tight.
- Timegrapher numbers: 52° lift angle, 227-231° amplitude, +3-6 s/d rate, and 0.0-0.1ms beat error
- Anything else that I am missing?
u/raylogandc — 22 days ago
▲ 2 r/RepTimeQC
GMT II QC - GMT II 126710GRNR Jub 904L SS/SS Black Dial VSF V3 DD3285 CHS
- Dealer name: Modern Times
- Factory name: VSF
- Model name (& version number): GMT II 126710GRNR Jub 904L SS/SS Black Dial VSF V3 DD3285 CHS
- Price Paid: $658
- Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/tzwMMxc
- Index alignment: It looks good from what I can see. I did use the alignment tool and I don't see anything that sticks out.
- Dial Printing: The dial printing looks pretty sharp.
- Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks alignment looks centered and the print looks good.
- Hand Alignment: Looks good. No issues from what I can see.
- Bezel: Looks good to me
- Solid End Links (SELs): SELs looks tight.
- Timegrapher numbers: 52° lift angle, 218° amplitude, +3 s/d rate, and 0.2ms beat error
- Anything else you notice: Everything looks pretty good to me
u/raylogandc — 1 month ago
▲ 2 r/RepTimeQC
First QC - Rolex Submariner 126610LN 904L VSF
- Dealer name: Modern Times
- Factory name: VSF
- Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 904L 41mm SS/SS Black VSF V4 DD3235
- Price Paid: $528.00
- Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/vsf-126610ln-904l-dd3235-69ZBIs4
- Index alignment: It looks good from what I can see. I did use the alignment tool and I don't see anything that sticks out.
- Dial Printing: The dial printing looks pretty sharp.
- Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks alignment looks centered and the print looks good.
- Hand Alignment: Looks good. No issues from what I can see.
- Bezel: I feel like it looks slightly off in the alignment picture with the pip just due to it being at a slight angle. Other than that everything looks good.
- Solid End Links (SELs): SELs looks tight.
- Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 272° amp., 0.1 ms, 59° lift. My only concern is the lift setting. That could throw off the numbers. I've read elsewhere that it should be 55° for the VS3252.
- Anything else you notice: Everything looks pretty good to me
u/raylogandc — 1 month ago
▲ 2 r/Calireps
Do I just publish a post here to contact Jerome for a rep?
I see everyone commenting about Jerome but unclear how do I contact Jerome for the watches I'm interested in
u/raylogandc — 1 month ago