u/raylogandc

GMT II QC -126710GRNR Jub 904L SS/SS Black Dial VSF V3 DD3285

  1. Dealer name: Modern Times
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): GMT II 126710GRNR Jub 904L SS/SS Black Dial VSF V3 DD3285 CHS
  4. Price Paid: $658
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/EsvZzuN
  6. Index alignment: It looks good from what I can see. I did use the alignment tool and I don't see anything that sticks out.
  7. Dial Printing: The dial printing looks good.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks alignment looks centered and the print looks good.
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me.
  10. Bezel: Not sure if it's aligned at the 24 hour mark
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELs looks tight.
  12. Timegrapher numbers:  52° lift angle, 227-231° amplitude, +3-6 s/d rate, and 0.0-0.1ms beat error
  13. Anything else that I am missing?
u/raylogandc — 22 days ago

GMT II QC - GMT II 126710GRNR Jub 904L SS/SS Black Dial VSF V3 DD3285 CHS

  1. Dealer name: Modern Times
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): GMT II 126710GRNR Jub 904L SS/SS Black Dial VSF V3 DD3285 CHS
  4. Price Paid: $658
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/tzwMMxc
  6. Index alignment: It looks good from what I can see. I did use the alignment tool and I don't see anything that sticks out.
  7. Dial Printing: The dial printing looks pretty sharp.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks alignment looks centered and the print looks good.
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks good. No issues from what I can see.
  10. Bezel: Looks good to me
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELs looks tight.
  12. Timegrapher numbers:  52° lift angle, 218° amplitude, +3 s/d rate, and 0.2ms beat error
  13. Anything else you notice: Everything looks pretty good to me
u/raylogandc — 1 month ago

First QC - Rolex Submariner 126610LN 904L VSF

  1. Dealer name: Modern Times
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 904L 41mm SS/SS Black VSF V4 DD3235
  4. Price Paid: $528.00
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/vsf-126610ln-904l-dd3235-69ZBIs4
  6. Index alignment: It looks good from what I can see. I did use the alignment tool and I don't see anything that sticks out.
  7. Dial Printing: The dial printing looks pretty sharp.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks alignment looks centered and the print looks good.
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks good. No issues from what I can see.
  10. Bezel: I feel like it looks slightly off in the alignment picture with the pip just due to it being at a slight angle. Other than that everything looks good.
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELs looks tight.
  12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 272° amp., 0.1 ms, 59° lift. My only concern is the lift setting. That could throw off the numbers. I've read elsewhere that it should be 55° for the VS3252.
  13. Anything else you notice: Everything looks pretty good to me
u/raylogandc — 1 month ago

Do I just publish a post here to contact Jerome for a rep?

I see everyone commenting about Jerome but unclear how do I contact Jerome for the watches I'm interested in

reddit.com
u/raylogandc — 1 month ago