u/rddtllthng5

View Poll

With BB, without K

View Poll

But they don't know about JumpPiece

When you realize Jumpbeard and the MC are actually more alike than different

Let's see which agenda is stronger

Diophantine equations, lifting, strong triangle inequality, two numbers are closer if their difference is highly divisible by p, fractal towers, completion (filling holes in the rationals by representing decimals in a p-adic base).

Please. Help.

Big Meme's talent is wasted

fact checked

wassup

Having people who starve and people who are homeless is a choice.

Roger ducked her on WCI.

Shanks clashed with all other yonkos, Loki, every admiral (except Kuzan).

Did they hear about the rumors of her neg diffing Jorul?

Got stabbed, face melted, heart attack, sparred with Kizaru and Kuzan. Still fucked up a fresh Akainu.

Clashed evenly with Shanks.

This is enough to say that prime WB/Garp/Roger are stronger than the strongest admirals and yonkos of this generation (at least durine Marineford).

It's hard to scale oldgen using Garp vs Kuzan since Garp was stabbed.

It's hard to scale oldgen using Rayleigh vs Kizaru since Rayleigh was not on the same level as Roger, Garp, WB. And he did look tired.

300? 500? 1000?

Bounty scaling yes. Underwater yes. Idk if Jack can mid-diff Who's Who.

BUT, I cannot see Jinbei stalemating both Inu and Neko.

HOWEVER, Jinbei stalemating Ace is still wild to me.

Greenbull was clowning 10 characters all individually >> VAs all at once.

Literally everybody in the New World like Doflamingo and Sabo one tap VAs all the time. Buster Call is a joke

Dodged DR Rocks while in elementary school is crazy

Another Oda W

I honestly think Prime Garp can destroy an island with a single punch. His haki already matches what Gura Gura can do. If he had the Gura Gura idk if he would have worked on his haki as hard.

People like Rocks and Mihawk can literally cut island-sized structures in half easily. Idk how having any fruit can help them be stronger. Hax yes, strength no

My range in this card room is purely 88+, Axs and QJo+.

Observations:

• When you are playing short stack people (the deep stacks) assume they can bully you with ATC. If you open to 15-25% of your stack and they have a hand they want to play, they'll put you all in. The majority of the time I am crushing the hand that they want to play. Constant double ups.
• I noticed that when I, and other players, am/are playing deep stacked, villians will bluff more, and it gets through more often. This makes sense as players are exploitable when they are deep stack. If you're playing $1000+ deep in a 1/3 game and villains overbet with $300, you're very inclined to fold even strong hands. "I'm not potentially risking the rest of my stack just to see his monster." But when you're short stacked they can't do that overbet bluff shit. Even if they do, your equity is so high that it's EV+ to call. You can't call off 100-500bb with the nut flush on a paired board. That's not EV+ and villians know you think that.
• Similar to point #2. So often I see villians look at (1) The board texture (2) Their cards (3) Your stack. And then start bluffing if your stack is big enough. They don't do that shit when you're short stack.

The drawback of this is if you're on a table full of good players (never happened in my life) who all inmediately fold when you open because they saw you fold for 2 hours straight. This shit aint gonna happen at the casino.

I think it's very true that even if you told a low stakes live player your hole cards they wouldn't be able to come up with the correct exploit. Buying in short for some reason triggers the ego part of a casino reg that wants to start pushing you around. This usually always results in them calling or raising me when I have them crushed.

I usually play home games with friends and family (I have a big family) and we all love limping, 6-ways to the flop even if it's a 3bet pot. We all laugh over insane coolers.

But at the casino (2/2, 2/3 where I am) I've experimented with tight, loose, aggressive, passive. Rake is very high where I am ($6-7) so for example if you win 100 hands in say 5 sessions you would be down $750-850 after tips.

The most consistently profitable strategy I've found is only to play premiums (88+, suited A, QJo+). But it's incredibly boring. I went through 4 tables in 4 hours a few days ago and my vpip at the last table for the first hour was probably 2%. Probably 5-10% at the other tables. Then I finally picked up some premiums and ran up $200 to $1300 in half an hour.

I rarely meet anyone at the casino good enough to exploit so I'm not worried about anyone picking up on my style. I have read that good LAG is more profitable than good TAG but I'm not sure if this is possible at low stakes with such high rake?

What has been your experience for the most profitable style at low stakes live?

I didn't understand this until I started doing it. Just one pair will make $60-100 if you just bet relentlessly on every street on a dry board. If you get raised just bail. People play face up. They'll tell you they have it.

By the time I've done this 20 times, I'll catch the nuts in my third session and make 10% of what I made by just value betting.

Like a lot of newbies I always thought well what if I get raised. Well what if they suck out on me. Let's see the river first. Yeah well if they suck out I lose $200 if I don't bet I miss out on $1000s in profit