How do you rate yourself during EOFY self-reviews without selling yourself short?
Suppose your company has four performance ratings:
- Below expectations
- Meets expectations
- Pushed above expectations
- Superstar / significantly exceeded expectations
During your EOFY self-review, how often would you actually give yourself a 3 (pushed above expectations) rather than a 2?
For context, I’m a mid-level SWE. I feel like I can point to a few concrete examples this year where I went beyond my normal remit, took on additional responsibility, or delivered more than what was expected at my level. But I still gave myself Meets Expectations.
My thinking was that meets expectations is a perfectly good rating and I didn’t want to come across as arrogant or as someone trying to inflate their own performance.
Now I’m wondering if I sold myself short. Maybe the whole point of a self-review is to advocate for yourself, and if you can genuinely back up a 3 with examples, you should select it and let your manager/calibration process decide whether they agree.
What do you all do? Do you rate yourself conservatively, or would you give yourself a 3 if you have evidence to support it?
Also curious to hear from managers: does an employee rating themselves a 3 come across as self-aware/ambitious, or can it hurt them if you ultimately think they’re a 2?