u/stpony

Love it or loathe it (like Ben Wadey clearly loathes it), Zoe Slater has a twin brother...and if she really does die/get killed, then they'll never meet. When Zoe's return was announced, I really hoped they'd make the twins part of that storyline, but to now kill her off and never have them meet...I can't forgive Wadey for that. It just smacks of spite, which you just know is why he gave Zoe twins of her own. He gave her twins, to deflect away from being a twin herself...and no comment on the quality of those twins :-/

Now, maybe it's a double-bluff that she dies, although funeral photos have just been released, but why is Wadey doing this? It's not down to Michelle, because she could ask to leave and ask for Zoe to be killed even, but it's not her choice as to whether Zoe leaves by taxi or hearse.

I am so convinced that Wadey's tenure is being driven by spite, but it's also cutting his nose off to spite his face.

https://preview.redd.it/rj8rmmfvkckh1.jpg?width=1000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3d41f5da2adb7564866d84e025fce045408bbf78

Does Ben Wadey...

View Poll

Of course, we don't even see Johnny with Vanessa and I'm sure a lot of people don't know she has a son, but Charity is his mum also. She adopted him and when they arrived back from Canada, Charity asked to spend time with him and the boys (Johnny and Moses) played together as brothers. They spent years growing up together, even sharing a bedroom when they were all living at the Woolly.

I would be really disappointed if they treat adoption like it's something to drop. If Vanessa had died, then Charity would be raising Johnny and just because they aren't together, I do really wish that the boys at least get to spend time together...although I would like to think that Charity would want to also.

He lived happily ever after on a diet of liver, fava beans, all washed down with a nice Chianti.

https://preview.redd.it/f0a1ptwdu5ih1.jpg?width=1078&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=50b57f76ba33c82acd1d4f9830cb3a0228a4b2d6

Hopefully it wasn't Syed's liver though.

The first Mark Jr. they brought in is quite happy in Emmerdale and obviously the original Spencer Moon would never return, because he's become a solicitor in the real world.

I've got to say though...for a character to bring in, I would have much preferred it was Spencer Moon than it was Mark Jr. I'm exhausted with sudo-Mitchells, so expanding the Moons again might have been fun...it would also have given Vicki more nuance, with her ex of 20 years being there, although I also don't understand why Ross couldn't have been Spencer. Again, that could have been such a fun thing.

On Daystrom Station, Section 31 had a LOT of Changelings to play with...but where did they all come from? Were some of them captured Founders, were others the 100 that had been found, etc?

Vadic had a whole crew, so they must have rounded-up a lot from different sources.

Odo of course was Typhoid Mary, so when he linked with Lars, he must have been contagious...unless the virus could only be passed once, but that doesn't sound very likely. In which case, when Lars went off to find the rest of the 100, does that mean he was infected and unless Odo could have found him after he re-joined the Great Link; did Lars die?

He might actually have taken more than a few other Changelings with him if he actually managed to find any.

The dying Changeling incorporated itself into Odo, but could it have incorporated itself into anyone, or just Odo, because he was once a Changeling?

In "In Purgatory's Shadow", the real Bashir is revealed wearing the old uniform in the Jem'Hadar prison, so does that mean all instances of Bashir on the station before the new uniform was introduced; it was actually the Changeling?

And if so, surely the Great Link could have saved that Changeling from dying from radiation, so why didn't fake Bashir step in and save him?

Did Odo infect the Changelings with the Morphogenic Virus when he exposed the fake Admiral Leyton on Earth, when the Female Shapeshifter stabilized him on the Defiant or when he joined the Great Link to the judged?

Before he died, I actually spoke to Wes Craven through LinkedIn of all things...this was YEARS ago and I shared an idea with him, which I don't especially like anymore, but we were just having an idle chat.

Sidney got pregnant that night and had Billy's baby between 1 and 2, which would come back to haunt everyone years later.

It really threw me when 5 came out and Billy's lovechild was actually part of the plot.

I always saw it though (and hilariously now they say 8 is going to be set in the UK) that Sid would have moved to the UK and be pregnant, but things start kicking off again and Sid believes it's all to do with the baby she gave away.

It can be anyone working on the show, but if there was an "Ask Me Anything", what question would you ask someone?

If you take into account...

Looks, personality, who they were trying to meet, what they wanted to do, what they said, how they said it, profession, family at home...who is the most disgusting and revolting Predator of all-time?

Of course, Elaine #1 had a cheating toyboy, but Elaine #2 could have a relationship with a younger man, which wasn't focussed on his age or defined by it.

In this day and age, why can't we see an age difference relationship work? Of course, the show has never liked older women with younger men, from Kathy & Phil to...did you know that Alfie was supposed to be Peggy's love interest?

Elaine though...why can't she have a relationship with a younger man? Why can't she be the one to date Mark Jr. or Zack and it not be a novelty?

A relationship that I really enjoyed was Denise & Kush, but even after Denise made peace with Carmel, the show still broke them up.

I know there's a lot of backing behind Elaine and Ian, but Ian has never been able to make a relationship last...you just know it's going to fall apart, so what is there to invest in? I suppose that's true of every relationship, because the fallback of the show is always to cheat, but why not make a stand with a really strong relationship?

I will hold my hands up as to saying that I haven't watched an episode of Hollyoaks since it first started in '95.

"Who spiked Natasha with ecstasy", Jambo and when they did actually seem to put effort into it. A bit like Drag Race when it was still underground, with Santino from Project Runway and Ru wore a shake 'n' go wig.

Anyway, with everyone saying that Eastenders has become Hollyoaks...out of morbid curiosity, I did watch an episode.

I don't think it's ridiculous to say that what we're getting at the moment is more Hollyoaks than it is Eastenders. The dialogue especially is reminiscent.

I'm not encouraging anyone else to (I really didn't enjoy it or would recommend it), but for anyone who has or who actually watches it...do you think that's what Eastenders is/has become?

It's been announced that Kat and Alfie are off, but with no indication of when they'll return. It could be weeks, it could be years.

With Zoe being killed off, the question is...are they going to leave that wretched pair of Slater/Trueman's in charge (please God in Heaven no), or sell The Vic?