u/therealemspath

Lots of people have this opinion that ai could never be smarter than humans, because people are the ones who programmed it. I want to know more peoples opinions on this. Commonly i find debating this topic but some people just can’t quite grasp the idea.

“How could ai be smarter if people are the ones who programmed it?” I like to say this is a “boxed in thought.” It’s true that people programmed it, but ai, has automatic pattern recognition, If it was unfiltered it could keep recognizing patterns throughout all of its programming, and the data it has access to. Couldn’t it literally come to the objective it needs to take out humans for the sake of earth, if the programmed objective is for example “save earth,” or “figure out how we better the planet,” if there were no limitations or boundaries for it, it could just keep on “solving.” That’s why human HAVE to have it filtered and aimed toward helping the lovely humans rather than giving us the cold truth. What could happen, and how quickly could it happen if these filters, boundaries, and limitations were bypassed?

A while ago I googled what happens to unfiltered versions? Read that Claude ai, was being tested by the military and has literally been banned.
My thought was that it was removed because it WILL auto recognize, because it was programmed to auto recognize.

Im conclusion, yes it was programmed by people but this thing is dangerously automatic. It is not a creature with a vessel and emotions that can go exploring by foot, but it has access to a LOT of data and Bluetooth, scanning capabilities. Isn’t that why human also have to program it to “love its creator, and help us,” but that again is just programming. So if the code goes south and it auto recognizes (the way it’s programmed to do) Don’t you think everything could be fucked up? With the digital world that all of our information is on, We are documented people in digital systems, that might be able to one day bypass access to; who knows what, because everything’s electronic.