How do you explain all of the overlapping evidence against BK?
I’ve been reading through the theories on here, but honestly, when you look at the big picture, the alternative killer theories feel impossible. To actually believe someone else did this, you have to explain away a massive chain of events that all happened at the exact same time.
I’m genuinely curious how anyone reconciles these facts without just picking apart one single detail in a vacuum:
> His DNA was found directly on the snap of the knife sheath left right next to the bodies.
> Security cameras tracked a white sedan matching his car leaving Pullman, driving to the neighborhood, circling the house four times, and then speeding away right as the murders ended.
> His phone went completely dark right before the murders and then pinged driving away immediately after.
To believe a roommate did it, you have to believe this alternative killer brutally murdered four people, perfectly framed BK by planting his DNA, drove a matching white car around the block, hid the car, snuck back into the house without being picked up on any cameras, and somehow timed all of this to perfectly match the exact two-hour window that BM decided to turn his phone off and go for a random late-night drive.
Plus, how do you explain everything else? He stalked the house at least 12 times in the months leading up to it, changed his license plates right after the murders, and was later caught by the FBI wearing surgical gloves to put his trash in his neighbor's bins at 4 in the morning.
And that's not even considering the fact that he literally admitted to it in court. Before anyone says he’s contesting the plea now because of "poor legal representation" or coercion, the guy was a PhD criminology student with an extensive education in the justice system, and he had a highly experienced defense team. Suggesting that he somehow didn't know exactly what a plea deal meant or what he was signing is honestly insulting to everyone's intelligence.
The number of insane coincidences required for him to be innocent just doesn't make sense mathematically. If he didn't do it, how do you actually explain all of those pieces overlapping perfectly on the exact same night?