

Isn't it curious how writers are able to develop smaller characters during the Dance while failing to give due importance to major ones?
I’ve watched and read several interviews with Ryan Condal, and he always says that the biggest challenge in writing hotd is the lack of information about the characters, some of them completely disappear from the narrative at certain points. Ryan often mentions that they have to fill in the gaps and invent things, and that is quite difficult to do.
Because of that, you would think they would value the existing information about the characters, given how hard it is to create them from scratch.
But that isn't what happens in practice, we see many characters with little background in the original material being well-developed and expanded, while characters who had more substantial information lose importance in the story.
If you had told me many years ago that Gwayne would be an important and compelling character, while Nettles would be cut from an adaptation of the Dance of the Dragons, I would have called you crazy.
And there’s nothing wrong with expanding Gwayne’s role—it was one of the few things hotd got right—but where is that same energy for characters who are better established in the books?
Why were Daeron and Jace’s feats cut? Why was Corlys condemned to spend an entire season stuck at the docks and another complaining about Rhaenyra not legitimizing his sons when he was a crucial member of the Black Council? They didn't even properly introduce Black Aly.
HBO only gave hotd eight episodes and that isn't the writers' fault, but I can't help feeling they don't make good use of the limited screen time they have per season. They prioritize minor characters, while those who needed more attention are sidelined and end up being poorly developed.