A Twist on the Mist: Remaking Urik von Kharkov
I've been working on Baron Urik von Kharkov for a while now—the darklord of Valachan from 2e. He's a tough nut to crack, for a variety of reasons. The two biggest problems that I faced were:
He doesn't really know who he is (panther, man, or vampire), which means he doesn't really know what he wants. That means it's hard to have the Dark Powers tempt him with something he wants but can never have.
His "Act of Ultimate Darkness" as described in his write-up in Darklords back in 2e is basically "20 years of being a vampire and being a dick to people. Also he was a jerk while he was alive." This is a really unsatisfying excuse to turn him into a darklord.
There are some other issues that crop up too, like the fact that he apparently spent a lot of time in Darkon but never suffered memory loss, or that his signature weakness (the cat of Felkovic) does not tie in any way to his unfulfilled desire (which, as noted above, is kinda poorly specified).
To rewrite von Kharkov for my campaign, I wanted to settle these bits of hash, while trying to keep some of the core elements of the character intact. Von Kharkov does have one awkward element that I left in place, which is that the whole "this is a beast pretending to be a man!" part is tied to one of the few Black characters in the early presentation of the setting, which is not a great look. I wanted to settle the other pieces, and I found some unlikely inspiration in doing so.
Von Kharkov is, as other posters have noted, mostly a victim in his original presentation. He's used as a weapon, a male version of My Fair Lady so that the wizard Morphayus ("sleep") can use him to fight his wizard nemesis Selene ("moon"). He's just a big cat who gets transformed, trained, set up for a romance, and then used to kill the woman he loved. It's a tragic backstory that does not deserve the attention of the Dark Powers, and a vague attestation that he was mean and nasty to people after escaping that is not sufficient to warrant making him a darklord. Plenty of people are mean and nasty and don't become darklords. He needed to do something poetically evil.
I took a little of that unlikely inspiration from the 1972 film Blacula. This film is quite a bit better than its reputation might present, and the main character, Mamuwalde (William Marshall), is both charismatic and a genuinely upright and moral guy who gets turned into a vampire against his will and then has to deal with the curse of unlife. Mamuwalde's whole M.O. is that he's on a tour of Europe to find influential people willing to help him end the African slave trade, and he runs afoul of Dracula and gets transformed. He later wakes up in then-contemporary 70s disco era and tries to establish his own vampiric circle, but in the end a group of unlikely hunters kill his progeny, and he winds up destroying himself. Like von Kharkov, he's more of a victim than a villain, someone trying to deal pragmatically with the inhuman demands of vampirism!
So here we go...
[More in reply]