The ascension is a bigger problem than the resurrection
Ask any christian whether the historical Jesus had a physical human body, "glorified" or not. By definition, a human body is subject to the laws of nature, which is exactly why the gospels include specific details like him eating fish and having his wounds touched.
Now look at where the ascension problems begin: going "up" depends on where you stand on the Earth. Ascending from London is a completely different direction than ascending from Antarctica. But even if one grants that he went upwards from Judea, he wouldn't enter heaven but the lethal vacuum of space where a physical human body cannot survive. By moving in a physical direction, it implies heaven is a physical location "out there," which places the entire burden of proof on the christian to show exactly where that is. If heaven is not in the physical realm, then going "up" makes no sense.
The moment that the apologist tries to escape by arguing that "Jesus's body temporarily or permanently became non-physical" to survive the trip, they lose. Being fully human means to be bound by physical human limits. If Jesus could shed his physical limits and become non-physical, then he wasn't really a human, and the entire ascension claim is him being deceptive and essentially a liar