u/winmichelle7

Now that filming is rumored to have wrapped or is expected to wrap by October 19th, I think we've all been estimating that the release date would be about 7 to 8 months later, which is the normal post production time needed for each season with season 2 being the one outlier. That would put us around the May/June timeframe and would be perfect for pride month marketing.

However, Wednesday S3 just wrapped filming as well just last week. Although they have more CGI and post production work that they'll have to get through, they have a similar 7 to 8 month post production timeline as well. This completely clashes with S5 and since these are two huge flagship shows for Netflix, they are likely not going to air both in the same month/quarter.

I do think Netflix may give the priority to Wednesday since S2 aired in August/September 2025 so there's already been a longer wait and the viewership numbers for S2 really took a hit because they've been taking way too long to release each season.

My official prediction would be that Wednesday gets the May/June slot and S5 gets July/August, potentially August/September depending on whether Netflix really cares about spreading them apart further.

The constant discussion about the "favoritism" towards Fran is so baffling to me sometimes. I understand people's frustrations about how repetitive and somewhat useless the sideplots for Eloise and Benedict (prior to his season) but to consistently take it out on the screentime Fran had in S3 and S4 is where they lose me.

Mind you, Fran had ZERO side plots or character development in the first two seasons. She was less known than Hyacinth and Gregory. When Hannah was introduced as the recast in the first few minutes of season 3, a lot of the GP didn't even realize she was recast or completely forgot Fran was a sibling. I'm not going to put all of the criticism on the prior showrunner for that because a lot of it was due to Ruby Stokes and her scheduling. Fran was only one year younger than Eloise so it was obvious she was going to debut in S3 so maybe the original plan was to flesh out her character a bit in S2 but we'll never know.

Because of that, they had to do so much catchup for Fran in S3 that the significant increase in screentime does seem "out of the blue" in a way. And even then in S3, they showed glimpses of Fran and her internal struggles but her character setup was very subtle and not nearly as loud/in your face/spelled out as the prior Bridgerton siblings. I've enjoyed Fran and Michaela's entire storyline thus far but my one of my few nitpicks would be that I wish Fran's character was more fleshed out than it was (outside of her romantic story) but that will likely happen in S5 instead.

I just wish people would point to what they wish the show can/should've done for the other siblings rather than say Fran should've had less setup. It's not favoritism, S3 and S4 were corrections of the lack of setup in the first two seasons. Fran's romantic story was always going to be treated differently than the other siblings - she literally has a wedding and a funeral to go through before her season. She was always going to take the B plot of at a minimum two of the other sibling's seasons.

Now that there is some speculation that block four (filming of the last two episodes) has started, it does seem like we may get no bts content at all until the end of filming altogether? They're definitely moving at a similar pace to Season 2 which had been the quickest filming had moved throughout the entire series so that would mean about 1.5 months left of filming, assuming no reshoots are necessary.

I originally thought we'd get something during June but nada so I thought potentially August next since August was the five month mark and this was when Season 4 got some bts content. Now that we have one week left in August, I'm not feeling very confident that we get anything this week. I know some people are thinking we'll get something in Tudum which is speculated to be at the end of September but a date has not been confirmed.

I wonder why there's been a bit of a shift in marketing strategy here? Maybe they're trying to spread the content in that post production period where we typically get nothing until the release date announcement and trailer?

The topic of prior leads completely vanishing in future seasons always seems to come up every month. Annoyingly, there are people in the main subs that always turn it around to criticize the "favoritism" towards Francesca by Jess when it's very clearly just a precedent that the show is following plus budget limitations from Netflix. I wish it was different and that we could do away with the recurring storylines for QC, Lady Danbury, and the Mondriches to have just a few scenes for each of the prior leads but that's just not going to happen.

That said, if we didn't know that Franchaela is likely going to disappear in after S6, what would you like to see post HEA? Candidly, I would've been happy with the few scenes Kanthony had in S3 and show a bit of their domestic life. I don't think the books had much of a post HEA for them either outside of the short epilogues.

Regardless of how we feel about how Aniya, Trinity, and Kayda weren't there for Melanie's feelings after movie night, she was always going to go back to Sincere. If Melanie's mom and sister's beautiful speeches wasn't enough to sway her to end things immediately, nothing would've.

*before anyone says anything, she can end things and STILL stay in the villa with enough votes.

Hear me out. If Aniya picked Carl, I don't see a world where KC completely showed his hand that he has written Aniya off in the firepit. This is the first time Aniya has really seen his true behavior. Without that behavior, Aniya 100% goes back to him in the guise of exploring both Carl and KC (like Olandria continuing to have hope with Taylor last year).

Most of the audience had even sided with KC right up until Casa and thought Aniya was overthinking things/was insecure. All of the OG girls told her she was overthinking when she was showing discernment until Casa, where both the OGs and the audience switched up and saw KC for who he really is. Aniya was always a slow burn and was never going to feel like 3 days was comparable to 3 weeks. I'm giving her grace here since she only saw a challenge and a tame kiss outside of a challenge (which she also did herself with Carl). She does not have the information we have.

Sometimes heartbreak/embarrassment is necessary and, in this case, Aniya needed this to move on. Production obviously wants Carl back for her and for her to still be here during movie night. He's definitely coming back, and it's his choice whether he wants to go back to her or not, and no one would fault him if he doesn't want to feel like a second choice.

Wanted to point something out that I saw in the main sub because I know some were disappointed that S4 didn't make Netflix's top 10.

Netflix's calculation for total hours viewed is directly impacted by run time. Season 4 has a runtime of 8 hours 45 mins compared to Season 3's runtime of 7 hours and 55 mins. That's a whole hour more.

This is how Netflix calculates the views: Total hours watched ÷ runtime

If we reverse the calculation for both seasons to derive at total hours watched, it would like this (assuming S4 got 95m views, the higher end of the estimated range):

S4: 95m x 8.8h = 836 million total views

S3: 106m x 7.9h = 837 million total views

Virtually identical. Meaning if S3 had the same runtime as S4, it would also end up at a calculated 95m views.

Just wanted to put this out there because I'm getting so tired of the fandom treating viewership numbers like Kpop stan wars. The show has always done well and has consistently gotten 90 to 100m views. I hope it continues to do so.

Been seeing a lot of commentary on how Bridgerton handles past leads due to how Off Campus has been handling their season switch and their showrunner mentioning the S1 leads won't be disappearing. I wanted to discuss how much screentime is actually feasible for prior leads. Some are also talking about the writing and the plots given to some characters which I won't be including here cause that's a whole separate conversation.

Before anything, I did want to point out that Off Campus will have four couples compared to eight couples that the audience falls in love with and want to see more of in future seasons. Double the number of characters right there.

Let's start off with a few non-negotiables. I think we all agree the main couple should have 45-50% of the screentime. This is what Saphne and Benophie got. Any less and you'll get valid complaints like we saw from Polin and Kanthony fans.

The B plot should have about 10% to set up the next lead, ala Francesca in S4.

Then there are the characters introduced for the "non-Bridgerton" lead for about another 10%. This would be the Penwoods and Downstairs staff in S4 for Sophie's set up. The Bridgertons as a family typically also get another 5%.

That's 75% right there for non-negotiable screentime. Imo, you cannot allocate less for the above without hurting the main lead or the setup of the main lead (again the content itself is a whole other conversation).

After all of that, you're left with about 25%. This is reserved for the future leads (Hyacinth and Gregory), some time for the previous season's leads (Kanthony in S3 and Polin, mainly Pen in S4), Violet, Lady Danbury and Queen Charlotte (usually the same plotline), and the Mondriches. I agree that the time for Danbury/QC/the Mondriches should be cut since I don't really see what the show can possibly give them that's not repetitive and interesting enough. For Violet, this is a bit more complicated since she needs to be a part of every main couple's story somehow. At most, you can reduce her time to just supporting the main couple and maybe leave her individual wants on the shelf until her eventual spinoff.

So that's about three to four storylines that can be removed and given to the previous leads instead. If we split that time up and give it to the previous four leads in S5, there will likely only be time to explore their lives as a couple rather than the characters as individuals (seen a lot of other complaints say that the women's stories do not expand past being a wife and a mother). If they were to explore the actual individuals, they'd likely have to prioritize one half of each pairing (ie. Pen prioritized over Colin in S4). Even in this scenario, there would have to be a phaseout of older leads to make way for the newer leads fresh off their season. There's only so much time available and after every season, you're adding on one more couple to incorporate. If you don't do a phaseout, you're splitting this time between five, then six, then seven couples.

A lot of people reference Season 1 as the best balance of an ensemble but Fran, Hyacinth, and Gregory were non-existent and they didn't have to worry about incorporating past leads.

As a caveat, there's also the issue of the budget. Netflix makes the final call on how much the show gets every season. These corporations are greedy af and don't want to pay these actors top dollar for less than 5% of screentime. Pretty sure the actors get paid by the episode rather than screentime so that adds up quickly. *Not defending Netflix before anyone says anything*

There are a lot of valid complaints against the show and this is one that most people want to see a solution for. But when you break it down on a granular level, it's a bit difficult to do without the show feeling a bit bloated.