Moved my domain from .ai to .com two months in.
▲ 4 r/AISEOTricks+1 crossposts

Moved my domain from .ai to .com two months in.

I registered my company's .ai domain on June 5, it was the only available at the time. Last week I made the move to .com. I've done this before at a previous company, .io to .com two years in, and it wrecked our search traffic for months. So this time I pulled every number first.

Google Search Console for the .ai, June 12 to Aug 11, basically the entire life of the domain:

  • 48 clicks
  • 5,470 impressions
  • Average position 30.8
  1. Not 48 thousand.

Three things I found that I hadn't expected.

1. The impression spike was fake. Last week of July my impressions went from 40/day to 400/day for eight days, then collapsed. Clicks didn't move at all. I pulled the indexing report and put it on the same axis: Google had indexed 27 new pages on July 24. Two days later the spike started. It was Google testing new pages at deep positions, getting no clicks, and withdrawing. If I'd used that week as my baseline I'd have "lost 70% of my traffic" post-migration and it would've meant nothing.

2. Almost all my traffic was my own brand name. 28 of 48 clicks came from the homepage, and my top queries were the company name "brandscreen" and "brand screen" at positions 2.2 and 2.9. Which means I had essentially zero non-brand organic to lose. The thing everyone warns you about with migrations didn't apply to me, and probably doesn't apply to most people asking about it.

3. Google and Bing are completely different environments. Bing sat flat at 20-40 impressions/day through Google's entire spike. And when I checked indexed pages: Google 335, Bing 13. None of the 13 were blog posts. But Copilot cited us 487 times over the same period, off that thirteen-page index. So an AI product was quoting us constantly while nobody clicked through from the search engine behind it.

What's happened since (7 days):

Redirects went live Aug 7, all 308s, path-preserving, single hop. Google started serving the .com on Aug 10: 161 impressions day one, 685 day two. Brand query "brandscreen" is already position 1 on the new domain. My domain-checker tool page dropped from position 39 to 90, which based on the July pattern I read as Google re-testing a new URL rather than a penalty. Time will tell.

The thing I actually can't find an answer to: all 487 of those Copilot citations point at .ai URLs. What ChatGPT, Copilot, and Perplexity do with redirects isn't documented anywhere I could find. I took a baseline of 8 prompts across 4 engines before switching and I'm re-running it weekly. I should have more information soon, since time is really the main driver here.

Happy to share the raw exports or answer anything. Also curious if anyone's measured the AI citation side of a migration, because I came up empty.

u/wtfisjustwrong — 2 days ago
▲ 194 r/Traeger+1 crossposts

Timberline XL Stacked

6 racks of 3-2-1 ribs, Traeger bbq chicken recipe where you steam before you smoke (unreal), veg skewers. 6 hour total time, the Timberline made it easy. Highly recommended if you entertain a bunch.

u/wtfisjustwrong — 2 days ago
▲ 0 r/llc

What are you using to verify your new company name? (I will not promote)

Curious what founders use to vet a company name. Right now I’m bouncing between USPTO, domain registrars, state databases, social media, and Google. Is there a standard workflow everyone follows? Feels like there should be a faster way to determine whether a name is actually viable before investing time and money into branding, filing, and building around it.

reddit.com
u/wtfisjustwrong — 1 month ago

I built a tool that checks business names. The patterns in what founders get wrong are kind of wild.

Been lurking here a while, figured I'd share what I'm seeing since it might save someone a headache.

Quick background: I run a small tool that screens business names — trademarks, domains, state registrations, social handles, what ranks in Google. Solo, bootstrapped, a month in. Not a lawyer, just a guy who got obsessed with a boring problem.

The tool's run over 1,000 names at this point — a decent chunk of that was me stress-testing it on batches of real startup names, the rest actual users. Either way, the same mistakes show up over and over:

People think "domain available" = "name available." By far the most common one. The dot-com being free tells you nothing about whether there's a live trademark or a company already registered under that name in your state. I've seen names where the domain was wide open and there was a registered trademark one letter away in the same category.

Nobody checks similar names, only exact ones. Trademark conflicts are about confusion, not spelling. If your name is Kwixly and someone has Quickly in your category, that can be a problem. Everyone searches their exact name, feels safe, moves on.

The Secretary of State check gets skipped entirely. Then they go to actually form the LLC and find out someone in their state already has the name. This one's brutal because you find out at the worst possible time.

Social handles are an afterthought until they're a problem. People pick the name, register the LLC, buy the domain, and then find out the handle is taken on the one platform their customers actually use — held by a dead account from 2014 that will never respond. Now the business is JoesPlumbing but Instagram is JoesPlumbingTX_Official and every customer who searches finds someone else first.

People fall in love first and check second. Once the logo exists, the check becomes something people avoid because they don't want the answer. The order should be: shortlist, check everything, THEN get attached.

Part of why I got obsessed with this: I've started businesses before, and looking back, a couple of them were fighting uphill from day one purely because of the name — competing in search against stuff I was never going to outrank. Never made that connection until I started really digging into it.

Anyway, whether or not you ever use a tool like mine: before you commit to a name, at minimum search the USPTO database (including spelling variants), your state's business registry, the domain, the handles on whatever platforms matter for your business, and just google the name and look at page one. Twenty minutes now vs a rename later.

Happy to answer naming questions if anyone's stuck on one. And I won't drop the link unless someone asks — don't want this to read as an ad, the advice stands either way.

reddit.com
u/wtfisjustwrong — 1 month ago

I built a tool that checks business names. The patterns in what founders get wrong are kind of wild.

Been lurking here a while, figured I'd share what I'm seeing since it might save someone a headache.

Quick background: I run a small tool that screens business names — trademarks, domains, state registrations, social handles, what ranks in Google. Solo, bootstrapped, a month in. Not a lawyer, just a guy who got obsessed with a boring problem.

The tool's run over 1,000 names at this point — a decent chunk of that was me stress-testing it on batches of real startup names, the rest actual users. Either way, the same mistakes show up over and over:

People think "domain available" = "name available." By far the most common one. The dot-com being free tells you nothing about whether there's a live trademark or a company already registered under that name in your state. I've seen names where the domain was wide open and there was a registered trademark one letter away in the same category.

Nobody checks similar names, only exact ones. Trademark conflicts are about confusion, not spelling. If your name is Kwixly and someone has Quickly in your category, that can be a problem. Everyone searches their exact name, feels safe, moves on.

The Secretary of State check gets skipped entirely. Then they go to actually form the LLC and find out someone in their state already has the name. This one's brutal because you find out at the worst possible time.

Social handles are an afterthought until they're a problem. People pick the name, register the LLC, buy the domain, and then find out the handle is taken on the one platform their customers actually use — held by a dead account from 2014 that will never respond. Now the business is JoesPlumbing but Instagram is JoesPlumbingTX_Official and every customer who searches finds someone else first.

People fall in love first and check second. Once the logo exists, the check becomes something people avoid because they don't want the answer. The order should be: shortlist, check everything, THEN get attached.

Part of why I got obsessed with this: I've started businesses before, and looking back, a couple of them were fighting uphill from day one purely because of the name — competing in search against stuff I was never going to outrank. Never made that connection until I started really digging into it.

Anyway, whether or not you ever use a tool like mine: before you commit to a name, at minimum search the USPTO database (including spelling variants), your state's business registry, the domain, the handles on whatever platforms matter for your business, and just google the name and look at page one. Twenty minutes now vs a rename later.

Happy to answer naming questions if anyone's stuck on one. And I won't drop the link unless someone asks — don't want this to read as an ad, the advice stands either way.

reddit.com
u/wtfisjustwrong — 1 month ago

I have user tested our new product, have a large addressable market, created our content strategy, but I'm not seeing the eyeballs. What am I missing? (I will not promote)

I successfully built 3 businesses with this model, but I'm not seeing the same traction with my newco. Has distribution strategy changed? Are people forming content partnerships earlier? I know SEO and AI traffic takes time, but I'm not seeing what I used to. Any magic bullets you can suggest would be helpful!

reddit.com
u/wtfisjustwrong — 1 month ago

What are you using to verify your new company name? (I will not promote)

Curious what founders use to vet a company name. Right now I’m bouncing between USPTO, domain registrars, state databases, social media, and Google. Is there a standard workflow everyone follows? Feels like there should be a faster way to determine whether a name is actually viable before investing time and money into branding, filing, and building around it.

reddit.com
u/wtfisjustwrong — 2 months ago

What are you using to verify your new company name? (I will not promote)

Curious what founders use to vet a company name. Right now I’m bouncing between USPTO, domain registrars, state databases, social media, and Google. Is there a standard workflow everyone follows? Feels like there should be a faster way to determine whether a name is actually viable before investing time and money into branding, filing, and building around it.

reddit.com
u/wtfisjustwrong — 2 months ago