The other sub is hilarious
I am becoming increasingly convinced that the other sub exists primarily as an exercise in satire.
The description, confidently reads as follows:
>"Most of our members are convinced by the substantial evidence that Amy went overboard and drowned on March 24, 1998, so our discussions usually focus on how and why instead of "if."
However, there is the conspicuous absence of anything that could reasonably be described as 'substantial evidence', let alone 'any evidence' for that matter.
From there, the discussion seems to proceed largely on the basis of increasingly elaborate accusations and criticisms untethered from any discernible evidentiary foundation.
My favourite recent example was someone who was adamant that Iva Bradley said something in Vanished. I disagreed, and they responded by quoting the exact passage I had referred to which, somewhat inconveniently for their argument, demonstrated that I was correct.
My other recent favourite was the guy who revealed himself to be a local of Curacao vehemently defending Yellow and attacking anyone who dared even label Yellow as some one who required further investigation.
At a certain point, you have to wonder whether the whole thing is an elaborate commitment to the bit.